Implementation of food safety policy in the Еuropean Union – guidance, variety, and resolution of challenges

Implementation of food safety policy in the Еuropean Union – guidance, variety, and resolution of challenges

Автор: Nikola Puvača, Bojan Vapa

Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa.

Рубрика: Original scientific work

Статья в выпуске: 1 vol.41, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The paper explores the intricate landscape of implementing food safety policies within the European Union (EU) context. Through an examination of key themes, including discretion and enforcement of policies, the EU’s problem-resolution strategies, and the concept of individualization that surpasses mere adherence to laws, the paper sheds light on the complexities and nuances inherent in ensuring food safety across the diverse member states. The paper scrutinizes the role of discretion in the enforcement of food safety policies within the EU. It delves into how regulatory bodies exercise judgment in interpreting and applying policies, taking into account the varying contexts and challenges faced by member states. The discussion highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers both uniformity in enforcement and flexibility to address specific regional or sectoral requirements. Further, the paper focuses on the EU’s problem-resolution strategies concerning food safety policies. It explores the mechanisms in place for identifying and addressing challenges that arise during the implementation phase. This includes an analysis of coordination among member states, collaboration with stakeholders, and the role of regulatory bodies in mitigating issues and fostering a harmonized approach to problem-solving. In the end, the paper introduces the concept of individualization, emphasizing how a diverse range of policies and practices exists beyond mere adherence to overarching laws. This section explores the unique approaches taken by member states in tailoring food safety policies to suit their specific circumstances. It investigates the benefits and potential challenges associated with such individualization, considering its impact on overall policy effectiveness and coherence.

Еще

European Union, food safety, European policy, guidelines, regulations, directives

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202105

IDR: 170202105   |   DOI: 10.5937/ptp2401018P

Список литературы Implementation of food safety policy in the Еuropean Union – guidance, variety, and resolution of challenges

  • Abrantes, D., Ferreira, M. C., Costa, P. D., Hora, J., Felício, S., Dias, T. G., & Coimbra, M. (2023). A New Perspective on Supporting Vulnerable Road Users’ Safety, Security and Comfort through Personalized Route Planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043027
  • Casula, M. (2022). How different multilevel and multi-actor arrangements impact policy implementation: Evidence from EU regional policy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2061590
  • CDC. The Latest on Antimicrobial Resistance. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Downloaded 2023, November 09 from https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/resources/fact-sheets.html
  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
  • Cinar, R., Benneworth, P., & Coenen, L. (2023). Changing conceptualization of innovation in the European Union and its impact on universities: Critical junctures and evolving institutional demands. Research Evaluation, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvad006
  • Craddock, D., O’Halloran, C., McPherson, K., Hean, S., & Hammick, M. (2013). A top-down approach impedes the use of theory? Interprofessional educational leaders’ approaches to curriculum development and the use of learning theory. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.736888
  • De Briyne, N., Atkinson, J., Borriello, S. P., & Pokludová, L. (2014). Antibiotics used most commonly to treat animals in Europe. Veterinary Record, 175(13), pp. 325–325. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102462
  • Dickson, B. (2023). The United Kingdom: The constitutional consequences of ambivalence towards European integration. In: EU Law and National Constitutions. (pp. 148–171), The United Kingdom: Routledge
  • Drahn, P. (2020). Theoretical Explanations for the Domestic Impact of EU Law. In: P. Drahn (ed.), Adoption of EU Business and Human Rights Policy: The Use of Discretion in the National Transposition of EU Directives (pp. 49–96). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46935-1_3
  • Đurić, K., Lukač Bulatović, M., Tomaš Simin, M., & Glavaš-Trbić, D. (2023). Monitoring and Evaluation as a Mechanism for Agricultural Policy Management. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management (JATEM), 6(5), pp. 934–943. https://doi.org/10.55817/ XETH8265
  • Engl, A., & Evrard, E. (2020). Agenda-setting dynamics in the post-2020 cohesion policy reform: The pathway towards the European cross-border mechanism as possible policy change. Journal of European Integration, 42(7), pp. 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1689969
  • Estensoro, M., & Larrea, M. (2016). Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: Engaging subregional governments. European Planning Studies, 24(7), pp. 1319–1335. https://doi.org/10.108 0/09654313.2016.1174670
  • Ferri, M., Ranucci, E., Romagnoli, P., & Giaccone, V. (2017). Antimicrobial resistance: A global emerging threat to public health systems. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(13), pp. 2857–2876. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1077192
  • Fischer, M., Imgrund, F., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2020). Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Information & Management, 57(5), 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262
  • Flynn, D. Ј., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics. Political Psychology, 38(S1), pp. 127–150. https://doi. org/10.1111/pops.12394
  • Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2005). How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches. Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1250–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2005.02.008
  • Havlík, V. (2023). The Europeanization of territoriality and its limits: The territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy and its varying implementation. European Planning Studies, 31(4), pp. 802–821. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2091407
  • Hazards (BIOHAZ), E. P. on B., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., ÁlvarezOrdóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A., Herman, L., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Argüello, H., Berendonk, T., … Peixe, L. (2021). Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain. EFSA Journal, 19(6), e06651. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6651
  • Hinteregger, M., Janzek-Hawlat, S., & Reichardt, B. (2016). Seasonal Variations of Outpatient Antibiotic use in Austria. Value in Health, 19(7), A421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.432
  • Imperial, M. T. (2021). Implementation Structures: The Use of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Policy Implementation. In:Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190228637.013.1750
  • Irepoglu Carreras, Y. (2019). Problem-Solving Across Literatures: Comparative Federalism and Multi-Level Governance in Climate Change Action. European Policy Analysis, 5(1), pp. 117–134. https://doi. org/10.1002/epa2.1066
  • Mendes, J. (2017). Bounded Discretion in EU Law: A Limited Judicial Paradigm in a Changing EU. The Modern Law Review, 80(3), pp. 443– 472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12265
  • Mercer, S. L., DeVinney, B. J., Fine, L. J., Green, L. W., & Dougherty, D. (2007). Study Designs for Effectiveness and Translation Research: Identifying Trade-offs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(2), pp. 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.005
  • Mukherjee, I., & Bali, A. S. (2019). Policy effectiveness and capacity: Two sides of the design coin. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), pp. 103– 114. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1632616
  • Okocha, R. C., Olatoye, I. O., & Adedeji, O. B. (2018). Food safety impacts of antimicrobial use and their residues in aquaculture. Public Health Reviews, 39(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0099-2
  • O’Toole, L.,J., Jr. (2000). Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), pp. 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
  • Pech, M., & Vrchota, J. (2022). The Product Customization Process in Relation to Industry 4.0 and Digitalization. Processes, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030539
  • Pissourios, I. (2014). Top-Down and Bottom-up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for the Use of Planning Standards. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), pp. 83–99
  • Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Solutions When the Solution is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development. World Development, 32(2), pp. 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.009
  • Puvača, N., & Britt, C. (2020). Welfare and legal aspects of making decisions on medical treatments of pet animals. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 37(4), pp. 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2004055P
  • Puvača, N., & de Llanos Frutos, R. (2021). Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Humans and Pet Animals. Antibiotics, 10(1), p. 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010069
  • Puvača, N., Vapa Tankosić, J., Ignjatijević, S., Carić, M., & Prodanović, R. (2022). Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment: Review of the Selected Resistance Drivers and Public Health Concerns. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management, 5(5), pp. 793–802. https://doi.org/10.55817/CSCQ3326
  • Rennings, L. van, Münchhausen, C. von, Ottilie, H., Hartmann, M., Merle, R., Honscha, W., Käsbohrer, A., & Kreienbrock, L. (2015). CrossSectional Study on Antibiotic Usage in Pigs in Germany. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119114
  • Scholten, M. (2018). Mind the trend! Enforcement of EU law has been moving to ‘Brussels’. In: Innovative Approaches to EU Multilevel Implementation. (pp. 96–114), The United Kingdom: Routledge
  • Stam, J., van Stuijvenberg, M., Grüber, C., Mosca, F., Arslanoglu, S., Chirico, G., Braegger, C. P., Riedler, J., Boehm, G., Sauer, P. J., & Group, for the M. I. P. S. 1 (MIPS 1) S. (2012). Antibiotic use in infants in the first year of life in five European countries. Acta Paediatrica, 101(9), pp. 929–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02728.x
  • Steunenberg, B., & Rhinard, M. (2010). The transposition of European law in EU member states: Between process and politics. European Political Science Review, 2(3), pp. 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000196
  • Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), pp. 609–643. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802760199908
  • Teixeira, J. E., & Tavares-Lehmann, A. T. C. P. (2022). Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121664
  • Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), pp. 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
  • Vapa Tankosić, J. (2023). Agri-environmental Climate Measures in the Serbian Agricultural Policy in Relation to the Common Agricultural Policy. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management (JATEM), 6(6), pp. 958–964. https://doi.org/10.55817/HBNT7451
  • Vapa Tankosić, J., Puvača, N., Giannenas, I., Tufarelli, V., & Ignjatijević, S. (2022). Food Safety Policy in the European Union. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management (JATEM), 5(2), pp. 712–717. https://doi.org/10.55817/EMRK6646
  • Vidovic, N., & Vidovic, S. (2020). Antimicrobial Resistance and Food Animals: Influence of Livestock Environment on the Emergence and Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9020052
  • Wegrich, W., & Kai, J. (2007). Theories of the Policy Cycle. In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. (pp. 43–62). The United Kingdom: Routledge
  • Zbiral, R., Princen, S., & Smekal, H. (2023). Differentiation through flexibility in implementation: Strategic and substantive uses of discretion in EU directives. European Union Politics, 24(1), pp. 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221126072
  • Duina, F., & Zhou, H. X. (2022). Brussels Under Pressure: Compliance, the Single Market, and National Purpose in the EU. In: Economies, Institutions and Territories (pp. 117–134). The United Kingdom: Routledge
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp