Israel and palestine: negotiation process testing ("Oslo-1" and "Oslo-2" cases)

The article focuses on the review of the practical experience of foreign policy negotiations, Israel and Palestine, which deserves special attention, as this analogue in the history of international relations, in particular the Arab-Israel conflict, no. Examine the current state of the Arab-Israel conflict is unthinkable without the experience of I. Rabin, who most vividly demonstrates the evolution of Israel foreign policy, his openness and readiness for dialogue, first of all, to a real compromise. This does not imply that all can be repeated. Experience frequent repetition of a repetition error usually. At the same time it said that the search for common programs relative parties were extremely complex Arab- Israel conflict task, because between them there was a deep split that has paralyzed the foreign policy dialogue and led to a sharp demarcation of positions both within the country and abroad. We would like to emphasize the fact that the further advancing the foreign policy talks, the more he helped outbreaks of violence, intensified them, caused his return character, rather than weakened. As a result, the Israel-Palestinian conflict as an integral part of the Arab-Israel conflict "increases the number of Arabs who are ready to die in a protracted historical conflict with Israel." The paper focuses on the relation of social forces to the idea of the world, desperately sought for him, and the results of the agreements reached in the course of which the hopes and disappointments of successive. It is said that the parties have not been able to overcome the aggressive perceptions of each other, while in captivity their traditional ideas and prejudices that inevitably dooms the conflict on false interpretation. It is obvious that the lack of consensus, balancing on the verge of war and peace, creates confusion and confusion in the minds of people who make their own history and the circumstances that they themselves have chosen. We tend to assume that in the history of international relations of the Arab-Israel conflict, which today are concentrated and integrated into the key challenges, needs, and the Middle East risks – the most protracted, complicated and provocative international conflict, more unsolvable, which for a long period of time is among his participants absolute opposition to all the contradictory and competing with each other issues ‒ territory, religion, settlements, etc. So expect a quick fix to resolve it is not worth it, especially at the cost of unacceptable unilateral concessions. The more that an effective method or ready universal solutions to resolve it while nobody came up with.