Experimental study on forced ventilation in dead-end mine working with various setbacks of the ventilation pipeline from the working face

The study of airflow patterns at the ends of dead-end mine workings is crucial for optimizing underground mining ventilation systems. Understanding these patterns forms the basis for designing and implementing effective ventilation strategies. Previous studies have shed light on the behavior of the main vortex and the formation of stagnant zones in such environments, but these insights remain fragmented and call for a more systematic exploration to integrate them into a comprehensive theory. This paper presents the results of a thorough field investigation into the forced ventilation behavior in a dead-end mine working with a significant cross-sectional area (29.2 m2). We evaluated the impact of varying the setback distance of the ventilation duct’s end from the working face at intervals of 10, 15, 17, 19, and 21 m. The experimental design included precise measurements of turbulent airflow velocities at 25 carefully chosen points (in a 5x5 grid) for each setback distance, covering the area from the working face to beyond the end of the ventilation duct. This included additional measurements taken 1 meter and 10 meters past the termination of the ventilation duct, moving towards the entrance of the working area. The fieldwork was carried out in a typical dead-end stope at the Kupol gold-silver mine in the Chukotka Autonomous District, created by drilling and blasting. The volume of fresh air delivered to the working was maintained at a consistent rate of 17.4 m3/s across all scenarios, aligning with the mine’s standard air flow rate derived from the ventilation requirement for exhaust gases emitted by internal combustion engines of Load-Haul-Dump (LHD) machinery. With the duct’s terminal cross-sectional area at 0.8 m2, this resulted in an inflow velocity averaging 21.75 m/s. Additionally, we included insights from three-dimensional numerical simulations performed in ANSYS Fluent, focusing on steady-state air movement and developed turbulence within the dead-end space. A comparative review of both empirical and modeled data shows that the ventilation jet, for all tested setback distances up to 21 m, successfully delivered air to the working face, where it then dispersed and initiated reverse flow patterns. These experiments led to the formulation of a linear relationship between the maximum relative velocity (compared to the initial jet velocity) at a distance of 1 m from the working face and a key geometric factor of the ventilation setup. This factor is the ratio of the duct’s setback distance to a characteristic dimension of the cross-sectional area, calculated as the square root of the cross-sectional area.