About the issue of referring to a branch of the relations associated with passing of public service and the features of the social partnership in the public civil service

In this article is discussed the accessory of the office relations in public service to labour, instead of intersectional relations. Мain international and national sources of legal regulation of the office relations on law-enforcement service in relation to in law-enforcement bodies of the Russian Federation are defined. It is noted that labour law`s character of the relations in the public civil and law-enforcement service is especially shown on the example of the collective relations. The contractual regulation of the social and labour relations being manifestation of the principle of freedom of work, allows to realize fully needs of subjects of social partnership on the basis of the principle of freedom of work. It is noted, what not all ways of interaction of collective subjects of labor law in the established forms of social partnership in the sphere of work can be applicable to the relations in the public law-enforcement service. It is noted that some of forms of the social partnership cannot be used, for example, in relation to service in Department of Internal Affairs. Participation of considered category serving in management of the organization is represented impossible the principle of one-man management and subordination (sopodchinennost) on service in law-enforcement bodies is established. The specified principle does difficult existence of mutual consultations (negotiations) concerning regulation of the labor (office) relations and other directly related relations. It demands of changes of the legislation of Russian Federation regarding establishment of concrete limits of distribution on legal regulation of the office (labour) relations of action of standards of the labour law as a whole and social partnership in the labour sphere in particular, fixing of features and an order of creation of labour unions (associations) of civil servants in public service for the mutual accounting of the rights, legitimate interests and duties between the state and these categories of workers is proved.