Copy-paste as a denial of justice
Автор: Sultanov Aydar Rustеmovich
Журнал: Евразийская адвокатура @eurasian-advocacy
Рубрика: Актуальные проблемы адвокатской практики
Статья в выпуске: 5 (30), 2017 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Purpose:To examine rooted in the practice of some judges ‘ substitution of their own judgment a copy of the opinion of one of the parties without regard to the outcome of the trial. Methodology: We Used a logical, systematic, formal-legal and comparative legal methods. Results: According to the author, the judicial acts, which represent a reproduction of one of the parties without regard to the outcome of the trial, in fact for the persons participating in business, are no different from judicial acts rendered without bringing in the case of one of the stakeholders. ignoring the outcome of the proceedings and activities of proof undermines the credibility of the court, because it is a cynical disrespect of the person participating in the case. Such judicial acts should be subject to unconditional cancellation, since it is impossible to prevent degeneration of justice in the regime of tyranny and injustice. Novelty/originality/value: The article has high scientific value and practical significance, since it examines the rarely discussed but important practical problem.
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140225116
IDR: 140225116