The direction of a presiding judge in a jury trial

The study reveals the problematic content and structure of the direction of a presiding judge in a jury trial. The certain aspects of this procedure are evaluated in terms of objectivity and impartiality. The research proves that the direction of a presiding judge is one of the key points of his procedural status providing the ability to influence the outcome of the trial. Based on the analysis of legal provisions and views of scientists, the author highlights a number of concerns in regard to directions given by a presiding judge. The researcher concludes that it is necessary to enshrine guarantees in law to ensure that the direction is objective and prevent undesirable effects on the jury. In conclusion, it is proposed to amend Article 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.