On the philosophy of state, sovereign thinking and the biologism of society

Philosophical understanding of state, sovereign thinking as the basis of public opinion is aimed at substantiating the idea of sovereignty (self-dominance as self-identity) of the individual, society and state in accordance with cultural, historical, civilizational and religious traditions of succession, with the goal of establishing one’s own author’s position, developed on the basis of universalism, consistency and integrity as objectivity, insuring against risks and errors. Sometimes in a number of studies, the emphasis is placed on the biological, bodily-economic component, and sometimes on the psychological (even psychopathic), or more precisely, psycho-somatic. This article also highlights the equally important spiritual, philosophical and religious aspect of the topic. At the same time, the following very important point is clarified: when they speak specifically about the cultural-civilizational aspect, then this, in fact, is rather a clarification of one of the three above-mentioned aspects, as certain representative databases in the form of sociological or historical samples. When defining the subject of research, talking only about the ontological as biological, only the physiological and even economic dimension of the political world and the processes occurring in it means missing the opportunity to consider this subject in the greatest number of options. The very assessment and qualification of anything as just a “biological”, or natural, or materialistic (dialectical-materialistic), or economic principle, due to its reflexivity, is not purely biological, etc., but also simultaneously, and the methodological, epistemological, cognitive stage. Any, no matter how specific, empirical fact in the legal, socio-political field is a set of abstract judgments, which, nevertheless, require philosophical and strategic tracing of the connection with the mechanism of its implementation in real society.