The adopted law has to be executed!

Purpose: Detection of value of professional, complex, preliminary discussion of the adopted law. Methodology: Theory-applied, historical and formal-legal methods are used. Results: In article importance of coincidence, or the most minimum rupture of terms between adoption of rules of law and their introduction to action for law-enforcement practice is proved. The author notes discrepancy of the legislative description of forced labor to the legal doctrine. Emphasizes that reflection of it. yet not put into operation punishment, in sanctions of articles of Special part of the criminal code of Russian Federation, does not correspond to provisions of his General part (the Art. 53¹UK of the Russian Federation). It is offered to establish in sanctions of articles of Special part of the criminal code of Russian Federation punishment in the form of forced labor without indication of its term, after imprisonment. In article structures of the crimes designed as the compliances of the terms of punishment to the legal doctrine and law established in sanctions of some of them truncated from positions on the example of Art. 205.3 and p.1 of Art. 205.4 of Federal Laws entered into the criminal code of Russian Federation from 02.11.2013 No. 302-FZ in redaction of 05.05.2014 No. 130-FZ are analyzed. Novelty/originality/value: Article differs in novelty as in it questions of dependence of application of the criminal law on terms of introduction and rules of its description in the precept of law are considered.