The Frames of Provincial Student Youth's Memory of Mass Political Repression: between Family Narratives and Digital Ecosystems

Introduction. The relevance of this study stems from the political use of difficult memories in contemporary Russian discourse and the lack of research on the memories of the centennial generation regarding mass political repression during the Soviet period. The aim is to characterize the scope of centennials' memories of repression in family history, taking into account the sources available to them, technologies for accessing information, and the interaction of family memories with the official memory regime. Materials and Methods. The empirical basis of the article is based on quantitative (online questionnaire survey of students of universities and colleges of the Republic of Mordovia, n = 700, multi-stage combined sample) and qualitative (30 in-depth interviews with students of the National Research Mordovia State University of various fields of study) sociological research conducted in 2023. Results. The main sources (including oral recollections of family members, textbooks, artistic and popular science films and literature, traditional and digital archives, thematic websites) and technologies for accessing information about mass political repression have been identified. It has been shown that, when motivated, students use neurosearch, digital archives, and genealogical websites (MyHeritage, Geni.com) to fill in gaps in their knowledge about their family's past. Forms of incorporating family memories into the public narrative (local history competitions, publications, museums) have been identified. The typological characteristics of the mnemonic behavior of centenarians are defined: pluralistic agonism or avoidance of mnemonic conflicts. The mode of communication about the Soviet past is characterized as pluralistic and pillarized, generally corresponding to the dominant historical narrative, which condemns political repression but avoids assessments of the Soviet period as a whole. The prevailing methods of managing the content and structure of family memory about repression are revealed: individualization of family history, historicization in the form of deactualization or meta-historical reflection, and the construction of one's own narrative of national history (among history students). Discussion and Conclusion. The study questions the universal value of the concept of transgenerational trauma, showing that the discussion of family memories among centenarians is based on a choice between agonistic and evasive attitudes. This allows us to characterize the mode of communication about repression as divided but not split. The results confirm the validity of the relational approach and point to the need for its application in further generational studies, as well as the importance of studying the social factors of framing family memories in the process of their transformation into “post-memory”.