An expansive interpretation of international law terms in order to ensure peace and security (by case study of international criminal tribunals)

The article provides an analysis of the main subjects of international law for the enforcement of the international law requirements in certain situations. In particular, the paper reviews the countries’ tactics during the establishment of Nuremberg and Tokyo Military Tribunals. It examines the UN Security Council Resolutions on the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). As a result, the authors estimate the state policy that is intended to circumvent the international law requirements in the name of international peace and security contributing to the fastest conflict resolution.