The correlation between the recognition of right and other ways of the housing rights protection

The article is devoted to the complex research of the right recognition as a way to protect the housing rights. In the author’s opinion, the system of the housing rights protection should be recognized as normatively segmental and standing at the primary phase of its development. In Article 11 of the RF Housing Code the protection ways are enumerated which do not reflect the specifics of the housing rights protection but replicate universal general civil protection methods. The majority of the special housing rights protection methods are listed in other norms of the housing regulation (on the lodge, on the dishousing, on declaring the person as the one who lost the housing rights, on the forced partition of the accommodation unit, on the forced exchange of housing premises, on not-raising the difficulties in living, on breaking the rules on the house and the utilities areas rearrangement, on declaring the order invalid etc.). The author points it out that the way of the housing rights protection should lead to a real valid indirect restoration of the disputable or broken right and should not have exclusively declarative character. The correlation between the right recognition and other ways of the housing rights protection is defined by the following criteria. 1. Breaking of the civil (not the administrative) law; 2. Character of the offence – the contestation of the right (but not the subsidy nonpayment, for example); 3. Absence of other housing protection right method directly defined by the law; 4. The right-acknowledged (but not the right-acquiring) character of the authorized person claim; 5. Actual availability of the housing unit in the authorized person possession (but not his ability to get it in future); 6. Possibility to effectively restore the housing right, i.e. stopping the dispute on it.