Comparative analysis of the efficiency and ergonomics of wired and wireless ultrasound systems

Автор: Emelyantsev A.A., Zheleznyak I.S., Kipriyanova I.V., Latysheva A.Ya., Romanov G.G., Voronkov L.V., Vengerovich T.D.

Журнал: Вестник медицинского института "РЕАВИЗ": реабилитация, врач и здоровье @vestnik-reaviz

Рубрика: Медицинская визуализация

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.14, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The form factor of an ultrasound device with a wireless sensor has become firmly established in the standards for equipping medical institutions in recent years. In the Russian science literature there is a limited number of works on the practical application of such systems and a description of their advantages and disadvantages. It is important to evaluate the capabilities of a wireless ultrasound device in diagnosing urgent conditions.Purpose of the study: to compare the effectiveness, advantages and ease of use of wireless ultrasound diagnostic sensors in relation to stationary devices. A comparative analysis of the wireless ultrasonic sensor "Uprobe-C5PL" (Sonostar, China) with stationary devices "DC-70" (Mindray, China), "CX-50" (Philips, Netherlands), "Logic E9" (GE, USA). A total of 40 patients were studied. The comparison was carried out based on the following characteristics: comparison of measured organ sizes, identification of pathological conditions, consistency of results between several medical experts, ergonomic characteristics and ease of use.Results: there was no statistically significant differences (Mann- Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, p > 0.05) and a strong correlation (r = 0.99; p

Еще

Wireless, ultrasound diagnostics, ergonomics, urgent, autonomy, comparative analysis, compact, fast, pocus

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143183532

IDR: 143183532   |   DOI: 10.20340/vmi-rvz.2024.4.MIM.1

Статья обзорная