The problem of cultural studies development in Russia in the aspect of the dialectics of absolute spirit
Автор: Khvoshchevskaya I.V.
Журнал: Общество: философия, история, культура @society-phc
Рубрика: Культура
Статья в выпуске: 8, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The present article is a literature review and analysis of the problem of cultural development in Russia and explores the role of the dialectic of absolute spirit in cultural studies. The literature review describes the main concepts of cultural development and examines Hegel's theory of absolute spirit and its influence on cultural studies. The article examines the reasons and factors hindering cultural development in Russia, such as inadequate funding for culture, lack of support for young talents, restrictions on artistic freedom, insufficient integration into the global cultural community, and insufficient attention to culture from authorities. Furthermore, the article discusses the dialectics of absolute spirit and its significance for cultural studies in Russia. The article describes the basic concepts of the dialectics of absolute spirit and its application in cultural studies. The dialectics of absolute spirit allows for an understanding of culture as a holistic system, recognition of the interaction between society and culture, analysis of the interaction between cultural traditions and innovations, and the interaction between culture and society. In conclusion, the article summarizes the literature review and analysis of the problem of cultural development in Russia. It examines the successful application of the dialectics of absolute spirit in Russian cultural studies, such as the project “Contemporary Art in Traditional Museums” and the creation of cultural centers that bring together various directions of art and culture.
Cultural studies, Russia, dialectics of absolute spirit, art, traditions, innovations, social processes, cultural interaction, cultural centers, cultural development
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149143465
IDR: 149143465 | DOI: 10.24158/fik.2023.8.31