Issues of the theory of criminal procedure agreements: parties and conclusion procedure
Автор: Dikarev I.S.
Журнал: Правовое государство: теория и практика @pravgos
Рубрика: Баланс публичного и частного начал в уголовном процессе
Статья в выпуске: 1 (79), 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
There are four types of criminal procedure acts in pre-trial criminal proceedings: acts of application of law, procedural appeals, procedural acts of dispositive nature and procedural agreements. In the current criminal procedure legislation, there is only one example of the latter type of procedural acts, namely a pre-trial co-operation agreement. Such a limited scope of contractual relations in criminal proceedings is explained by its public law nature; however, this does not mean that this type of criminal procedure acts has no prospects for development. To make them real it is required to develop a theory of criminal procedure agreements. The purpose of the study is to develop, based on analysing the regulation of a pre-trial cooperation agreement, general provisions that could constitute a theoretical basis for the regulation of criminal procedure agreements. In particular, it is necessary to define parties of procedural agreements, their subject matter, guarantees of the rights and legitimate interests of participants of procedural agreements at the conclusion stage, the limits of appealing against the refusal of authorities to conclude procedural agreements. The dialectical method serves as the methodological basis of the research. In addition, the general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and systematic approach are used, as well as special legal methods, primarily logical-legal and legal interpretation.
Criminal procedure acts, procedural agreement, pre-trial cooperation agreement, victim
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142245306
IDR: 142245306 | DOI: 10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.5