A Classification Framework for Software Defect Prediction Using Multi-filter Feature Selection Technique and MLP

A Classification Framework for Software Defect Prediction Using Multi-filter Feature Selection Technique and MLP

Автор: Ahmed Iqbal, Shabib Aftab

Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science @ijmecs

Статья в выпуске: 1 vol.12, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Production of high quality software at lower cost can be possible by detecting defect prone software modules before the testing process. With this approach, less time and resources are required to produce a high quality software as only those modules are thoroughly tested which are predicted as defective. This paper presents a classification framework which uses Multi-Filter feature selection technique and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) to predict defect prone software modules. The proposed framework works in two dimensions: 1) with oversampling technique, 2) without oversampling technique. Oversampling is introduced in the framework to analyze the effect of class imbalance issue on the performance of classification techniques. The framework is implemented by using twelve cleaned NASA MDP datasets and performance is evaluated by using: F-measure, Accuracy, MCC and ROC. According to results the proposed framework with class balancing technique performed well in all of the used datasets.

Еще

Software Defect Prediction, Feature Selection, Multi-Filter Feature Selection, MLP, Artificial Neural Network, Machine Learning Techniques

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15017157

IDR: 15017157   |   DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2020.01.03

Список литературы A Classification Framework for Software Defect Prediction Using Multi-filter Feature Selection Technique and MLP

  • C. Manjula and L. Florence, “Deep neural network based hybrid approach for software defect prediction using software metrics,” Cluster Comput., pp. 1–17, 2018.
  • I. Gondra, “Applying machine learning to software fault-proneness prediction,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 186–195, 2008.
  • K. O. Elish and M. O. Elish, “Predicting defect-prone software modules using support vector machines,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 649–660, 2008.
  • F. Lanubile, A. Lonigro, and G. Visaggio, “Comparing Models for Identifying Fault-Prone Software Components,” Proc. Seventh Int’l Conf. Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng., pp. 312–319, June 1995.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, I. Ullah, M. S. Bashir, and M. A. Saeed, “A Feature Selection based Ensemble Classification Framework for Software Defect Prediction,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 54-64, 2019.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, U. Ali, Z. Nawaz, L. Sana, M. Ahmad, and A. Husen “Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques on Software Defect Prediction using NASA Datasets,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 5, 2019.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, I. Ali, and N. Hameed, “Hybrid Tools and Techniques for Sentiment Analysis: A Review,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, S. S. Muhammad, and S. Ahmad, “Machine Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis: A Review,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 27, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad and S. Aftab, “Analyzing the Performance of SVM for Polarity Detection with Different Datasets,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 29–36, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, and I. Ali, “Sentiment Analysis of Tweets using SVM,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 25–29, 2017.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, M. S. Bashir, and N. Hameed, “Sentiment Analysis using SVM: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, 2018.
  • M. Ahmad, S. Aftab, M. S. Bashir, N. Hameed, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “SVM Optimization for Sentiment Analysis,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 4, 2018.
  • S. Aftab, M. Ahmad, N. Hameed, M. S. Bashir, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “Rainfall Prediction in Lahore City using Data Mining Techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 4, 2018.
  • S. Aftab, M. Ahmad, N. Hameed, M. S. Bashir, I. Ali, and Z. Nawaz, “Rainfall Prediction using Data Mining Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 5, 2018.
  • A. Iqbal and S. Aftab, “A Feed-Forward and Pattern Recognition ANN Model for Network Intrusion Detection,” Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 19–25, 2019.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, I. Ullah, M. A. Saeed, and A. Husen, “A Classification Framework to Detect DoS Attacks,” Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 40-47, 2019.
  • I. H. Witten, E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. J. Pal, Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016.
  • S. Huda et al., “A Framework for Software Defect Prediction and Metric Selection,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, no. c, pp. 2844–2858, 2017.
  • E. Erturk and E. Akcapinar, “A comparison of some soft computing methods for software fault prediction,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1872–1879, 2015.
  • Y. Ma, G. Luo, X. Zeng, and A. Chen, “Transfer learning for cross-company software defect prediction,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 54, no. 3, Mar. 2012.
  • M. Shepperd, Q. Song, Z. Sun and C. Mair, “Data Quality: Some Comments on the NASA Software Defect Datasets,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 39, pp. 1208–1215, 2013.
  • “NASA Defect Dataset.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/klainfo/NASADefectDataset. [Accessed: 27-October-2019].
  • B. Ghotra, S. McIntosh, and A. E. Hassan, “Revisiting the impact of classification techniques on the performance of defect prediction models,” Proc. - Int. Conf. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, pp. 789–800, 2015.
  • G. Czibula, Z. Marian, and I. G. Czibula, “Software defect prediction using relational association rule mining,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 264, pp. 260–278, 2014.
  • D. Rodriguez, I. Herraiz, R. Harrison, J. Dolado, and J. C. Riquelme, “Preliminary comparison of techniques for dealing with imbalance in software defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM, p. 43, 2014.
  • U. R. Salunkhe and S. N. Mali, “A hybrid approach for class imbalance problem in customer churn prediction: A novel extension to under-sampling,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 71–81, 2018.
  • N. F. Hordri, S. S. Yuhaniz, N. F. M. Azmi, and S. M. Shamsuddin, “Handling class imbalance in credit card fraud using resampling methods,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 390–396, 2018.
  • A. O. Balogun, S. Basri, S. J. Abdulkadir, and A. S. Hashim, “Performance Analysis of Feature Selection Methods in Software Defect Prediction: A Search Method Approach,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 13, p. 2764, 2019.
  • N. Sánchez-Maroño, A. Alonso-Betanzos, and M. Tombilla-Sanromán, “Filter methods for feature selection - A comparative study,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 4881 LNCS, pp. 178–187, 2007.
  • M. R. Malik, L. Yining, and S. Shaikh, “Analysis of Software Deformity Prone Datasets with Use of AttributeSelectedClassifier,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 14–21, 2019.
  • R. M. De Castro Andrade, I. De Sousa Santos, V. Lelli, Ḱathia Marçal De Oliveira, and A. R. Rocha, “Software testing process in a test factory from ad hoc activities to an organizational standard,” ICEIS 2017 - Proc. 19th Int. Conf. Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. Iceis, pp. 132–143, 2017.
  • D. Kumar and K. K. Mishra, “The Impacts of Test Automation on Software’s Cost, Quality and Time to Market,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 79, pp. 8–15, 2016.
  • A. Dadwal, H. Washizaki, Y. Fukazawa, T. Iida, M. Mizoguchi, and K. Yoshimura, “Prioritization in automotive software testing: Systematic literature review,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 2273, no. QuASoQ, pp. 52–58, 2018.
  • A. Bertolino, “Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams,” FoSE 2007 Futur. Softw. Eng., no. September, pp. 85–103, 2007.
  • A. Iqbal, S. Aftab, and F. Matloob, “Performance Analysis of Resampling Techniques on Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 44-53, 2019.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp