A Network-Based Peer Evaluation Strategy

A Network-Based Peer Evaluation Strategy

Автор: Mohamed A. Alket

Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) @ijmecs

Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.9, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The purpose of this study was to design a network-based peer evaluation strategy -which included two types of peer evaluation (known and unknown) to investigate the effect of these two types on developing problem-solving and critical thinking skills for students in Java object oriented programming language course (OOP). The participants of this study were twenty-four (n=24) students at College of Science and Arts, Qassim university. The results revealed that the two types of peer evaluation (in both known and unknown) had a positive effect on developing problem-solving and critical thinking skills for students. After, the comparison between the post-application of the two experimental groups in the problem solving and critical thinking skills, although there is a slightly higher between mean ranks in the sake of the unknown group, the results showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups. Finally, the researcher recommended to using a network-based peer evaluation strategy with other specializations and a large sample.

Еще

Peer evaluation, problem-solving skills, object-oriented programming, and critical thinking

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15014960

IDR: 15014960

Список литературы A Network-Based Peer Evaluation Strategy

  • Anson, R., & Goodman, J. (2014). A Peer Assessment System to Improve Student Team Experiences, journal of education for business, 89: 27–34.
  • Bie, H., Wilhelm, P., & Meij, H. (2015). The Halpern critical thinking assessment: toward a Dutch appraisal of critical thinking, thinking skills and creativity 17(2015)33-44.
  • Brutus, S., & Donia, M. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of Students in Groups with a Centralized Peer Evaluation System, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2010, Vol. 9, No. 4, 652–662.
  • Cardella, M., Diefes-Dux, H., Verleger, M., Fry, A., & Carnes, M. (2011). Work in Progress - Using Multiple Methods to Investigate the Role of Feedback in Open-Ended Activities, 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Pages: S4D-1 - S4D-3, DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6143106 October 12 - 15, 2011, Rapid City, SD.
  • Cevik, Y. (2015). Assessor or assessee? Investigating the deferential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students' problem-solving skills, computer in humans behavior, 52(2015)250-258.
  • Cevik, Y., Haslaman, T., & Celik, S. (2015). The effects of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities, students in educational evaluations, 44(2015) 23-35.
  • Chan Koh, L. (2008). Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education, Nurse Education in Practice (2008) 8, 223–230. Retrieved from: www.elsevier.com/nepr.
  • Chang, S., Chah yu, L., Kuo, Y., Mai, Y., & Dechen, J. (2015). Applying online peer assessment with total quality management to elevate project-based learning performance, journal of Baltic Science education, Vol. 14, No. 3, (P. 379-390).
  • Chen Chuang, W. (2009). The effects of four different types of corrective feedback on EFL students' writing in Taiwan, Da-Yeh journal of general education, P 123-138.
  • Chengqing Wu., Chanda, E., & Willison, J. (2014). Implementation and outcomes of online self and peer assessment on group based honors research projects, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 39, No.1, 21–37.
  • Chiu-Lin Lai, Hawang, J. (2014). A peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving critical thinking of students, 2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics. Retrieved from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6913324/
  • Cranney, J., & Dunn, D. (2011). The psychologically literate citizen: Foundation and global perspectives, Oxford University press, ISBN-13:978-0-19-979494-2, BF77.P758.2011, New York.
  • Cvetkovic, D. (2013). Evaluation of FCS Self and Peer-Assessment Approach Based on Cooperative and Engineering Design Learning, 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Osaka, Japan, 3 - 7 July, 2013, 978-1-4577-0216-7/13/$26.00 ©2013 IEEE.
  • Demirel, M., & Derman, I., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A study on the relationship between reflective thinking skills towards problem-solving attitudes towards mathematics, procedia - Social and behavioral sciences 197(2015) 2086-2096.
  • Dewey, J. (1933) How to think, New York: D. C, Health & Co publishers.
  • Dilley, A., et al. (2012). What we know about critical thinking, p21partenarshiop for 21st-century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org
  • Dusek, G., & Ayhan, A. (2014). A study on problem-solving skills of the children from broken family and full parents family attending regional primary boarding school, procedia - Social and behavioral sciences 152(2014) 137-142.
  • Dziedzic, M., Janissek, P., & Bender, A.(2008).Assessment by Peers – An Effective Learning Technique, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 22 – 25, 2008, Saratoga Springs, ny.
  • El-Mowafy, A. (2014) Using peer assessment of fieldwork to enhance students' practical training, assessment & evaluation in higher education, Vol. 39, No.2, 223-241.
  • Facione, P. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts, insight assessment, Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA.
  • Fermelis, j., Tucker, R., & Plamer, S. (2007). Online self and peer assessment in large, multi-campus, multi-cohort contexts, Proceedings ascilite Singapore, 271-281. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/procs/fermelis.pdf.
  • Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. (2007). Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies, the American journal of distance education, 21(3), 117–132.
  • Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding student's problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompt and peer interaction. Educational technology research and development, 51(1), 21-38.
  • Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, February 2010, pp. 143–162.
  • Halpern, D. (2003). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping College students develop the skills and disposition of a critical thinker, Jossey- Pass publishers.
  • Hassan, S., Yusof, K., Mohammad, S., Abu, M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). Methods to study enhancement of problem-solving skills in engineering students throw cooperative Problem-Based learning, the international conference on teaching –and learning in higher education (ICTLHE 2012), procedia Social and behavioral Sciences 56(2012)737-746.
  • Iran, T., et al. (2007) Critical thinking instrumentation manual. Gainesville, University of Florida.
  • Jeevanantham, S. (2005). Why teach critical thinking? Africa education review, 2(1):188-129 doi: 10.1080/18146620508566295.
  • Jiehong, W., Fuixang, G.(2009).Study of Feedback Teaching for Computer Culture Basics, Proceedings of 2009 4th International Conference on Computer Science & Education. Retrieved from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5228273/
  • Jul in, S., Feng Liu, E., & Ming-yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Does attitude influence Achievement? IEEE transactions on education, vol. 44, No. 2, May 2001.
  • Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: the use of ‘Authentic self- and peer assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 38, No. 7, 875–891. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963.
  • Lai, A., & Chen, C. (2013). Mobile-Based peer assessment app and elementary students' perception: project works of computer curriculum as an example, 2013 EEE 13th international conference on advanced learning technologies. Retrieved from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6601999/
  • Lamm, A., Harder, A., Irani, T., Roberts, T., & Snyder, L. (2011). Developing strong international agricultural education programs by understanding cognition, Journal international of agricultural and extension education, 18(2), 30-39.
  • LAN Li, Liu, X., & Steckelperg, A. (2010). Assessor or assesse: How student learning improves giving and receiving peer feedback, British Journal of Educational Technology of 41 No 3 2010 525–536. Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x/full.
  • Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006).Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, July 2006, pp. 279-290. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562510600680582.
  • Liu, Z., Lee, C. (2013). Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 187-199.
  • Liu, Z., & Lin, S. (2007). The relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and meta cognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 38 No 6 2007. P 1122–1125.
  • Lu, J., Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback, Springer, Instr Sci (2012) 40:257–275. Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11251-011-9177-2.
  • Maarof, N., Yamat, H., Li li, K. (2011). The role of Teacher, Peer and Teacher-Peer Feedback in Enhancing ESL Students’ Writing, World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (Innovation and Pedagogy for Lifelong Learning): 29-35.
  • Mayer, R., & Wittrock, M. (2006). Problem-solving, in P.A Alexander & P.H winne(Eds), handbook of education psychology. Rutledge, 287-304.
  • Mocozet, L.,Tardy, C. (2015). An assessment for learning framework with peer Assessment of group works, 978-1-4799-1756-3. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net.
  • Nagang, T., Nair, S., & Prachak, B. (2013). Developing instruments to measure thinking skills and problem-solving skills among Malaysian primary school pupils, 5th world conference on educational sciences - WCES , 116(2014)3760-3764.
  • Ng, W. (2012). The Impact of Peer Assessment and Feedback Strategy in Learning Computer Programming in Higher Education, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 9.
  • O’Farrell, C. (2007). Enhancing Student Learning through Assessment, a Toolkit Approach. Retrieved from http://learningandteaching.dit.ie/documents/assessment_toolkit_v41f.pdf
  • Pearce, J., Mulder, R., & Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching, Centre for the Study of Higher Education the University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/
  • Peggy, A.Ertmer. Richardson, J., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connoly, D., Coulthard, J., & Mong, C. (2007). Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study, Journal of computer-Mediated Communication, Volume 12, Issue 2, pages 412–433.
  • Ran, J., Han, H., & Wang, D. (2010). I Tutor: Taking formative assessment and interactive feedback as teaching and learning strategies for improving students’ skill learning effectiveness, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Shemy, N. (2015). Two interaction types (synchronize and asynchronous) in peer feedback strategy within electronic learning environment and its impact on the achievement, motivation and the trend towards, 4th – International Conference For e-learning & Distance Education,2-5 march 2015. Retrieved from: http://eli.elc.edu.sa/2015.
  • Sitthiworachart, J., et al. (2008). Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of computer assisted learning. Volume 24 (number 3). Pp. 217-231. ISSN 0266-4909.
  • Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment Matters: Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment, Teaching Development Unit | Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako, the university of Waikato. Retrieved from www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu.
  • Stedman, N. L., & Andenoro, C. (2007). Identification of relationship between emotional intelligence and critical thinking dispositions in undergraduate leadership students, journal of leadership education, 6(1), 190-208.
  • Steven D, Lonn. (2009). Student use of a learning management system for group projects: a case study investigating interaction, collaborative, and knowledge construction, a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy, university of Michigan, Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/64743/slonn_1.pdf.
  • Strang, K. D. (2015). The effectiveness of peer assessment in a professionalism course using an online workshop. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14IIPp001-016Strang0350.pdf
  • Trahasch, S. (2004). Towards a Flexible Peer Assessment System, German Research Foundation DOI: 10.1109/ITHET.2004.1358227
  • Uto, M., & Ueno, M. (2015). Item Response Theory for Peer Assessment, IEEE transactions on learning technologies, Volume 9, Issue 2, p 157-170.
  • Wang, Y. (2008). E-Portfolios: A New Peer Assessment Technology in Educational Context, International Symposiums on Information Processing, IEEE computer society, P 360-363. DOI 10.1109/ISIP.2008.139.
  • Wang, Y., Liang, Y., Liu, L., & Liu, Y. (2014). A Motivation Model of Peer Assessment in Programming Language Learning, computer and society. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6113
  • Wavear, D., & Esposto, E. (2012). Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 37, No. 7, November 2012, 805–816.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp