Agents of social change: determining identification criteria and designing an indicator model

Автор: Vorobeva Irina N., Mekhova Albina A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Modern Russian society is undergoing major changes. The concept of social change has a long history of theoretical understanding; usually, two approaches, the evolutionary and the revolutionary, are distinguished. We consider this concept within the framework of a new post-modernist or organizational-activity paradigm, when the “social agent” plays an active transformative role. The problem is of a complex interdisciplinary nature, directly related to the theory of social change, social and human capital, and the creative class. We try to find out which social groups of Russian society support changes and can become their agent-guides, what distinguishes them from other people, what their share is in the modern social structure of society, region, city. The article provides a justification for the relevance of identifying agents of social change as a social basis for the transformation and development of the territory. Based on the analysis of foreign and domestic research experience, we design our own notion of For citation: Vorobeva I.N., Mekhova A.A. (2022). Agents of the term “agents of social change”, define the criteria for their identification, create an indicator model for empirical identification of the share of agents of social change in the social structure of the urban community. Theoretical judgments and conclusions are supported by empirical data from a sociological survey of Cherepovets residents. The choice of the city for approbation of the model is not accidental. Cherepovets has the status of a territory of advanced socio-economic development and is in dire need of agents of social change. According to an empirical study, in Cherepovets the core of social change is 4.6%, and the periphery of the core, which we designate as activists, is 17.4%. A comparison of the empirical results of our study and studies of leading Russian authors on the topic of social participation shows that Cherepovets, on average, reflects the general trend in Russia. The population as a whole has rather pronounced attitudes towards activity, while the behavioral practices expressed in our model in various forms of social participation are lagging behind significantly. We prove the validity of the developed model for studying the stated problem and empirically confirm that the development potential of the territory is largely determined by the presence of agents of social change in the social structure.

Еще

Agents of social change, creative class, indicator model, social capital, social participation, social resources

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238477

IDR: 147238477   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.12

Список литературы Agents of social change: determining identification criteria and designing an indicator model

  • Bartal A., Pliskin N., Ravid G. (2019). Modeling influence on posting engagement in online social networks: Beyond neighborhood effects. Social Networks, 59, 61–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.005
  • Batova M.M. (2019). Formation of digital competencies in the system “education – science – production”. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki=Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 9(4), 1573–1584. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.9.4.41467 (in Russian).
  • Bekalu M.A., McCloud R.F., Minsky S., Viswanath K. (2020). Association of social participation, perception of neighborhood social cohesion, and social media use with happiness: Evidence of trade-off. Journal of Community Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22469
  • Bogdanov V.S., Merzlyakov A.A. (2018). Diagnostics of the potential of social participation in the context of organizing feedback between authorities and population. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie=Research Result. Sociology and Management, 4, 65–77. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-6 (in Russian).
  • Bourdieu P. (2001). Forms of capital. In: The Sociology of Economic Life. 2nd Edition. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Bourdieu P. (2002). Forms of capital. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya=Economic Sociology, 5, 60–74. Available at: https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2011/12/08/1208205039/ecsoc_t3_n5.pdf (in Russian).
  • Chanda S., Mishra R. (2019). Impact of transition in work status and social participation on cognitive performance among elderly in India. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1261-5
  • Coleman J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
  • Coleman J. (2001). Social and human capital. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 3, 122–139 (in Russian).
  • Dezuanni M., Foth M. (2019). Digital Participation through Social Living Labs. Valuing Local Knowledge, Enhancing Engagement.
  • Drozdova Ju.A. (2019). A resource approach towards examining territorial communities. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii=Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 10(1), 82–103. DOI: DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.28.1.557 (in Russian).
  • Drucker P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Practice and Principles. New York.
  • Drucker P.F. (2002). Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke [Management Challenges for 21st Century]. Moscow: Vil’yams.
  • Fagence M. (1977). Citizen Participation in Planning. Pergamon.
  • Florida R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. Basic Books.
  • Florida R. (2005). The Flight of the Creative Class. The New Global Competition for Talent. HarperBusiness, HarperCollins.
  • Galitskaya E.G., Galitskii E.B., Petrenko E.S., Rapoport S.A. (2012). The “FOMography” methodology and resource differentiation of Russian society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 10, 131–142 (in Russian).
  • Guzgavina T., Mekhova A. (2018). Social capital – a factor in region’s sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3), 483–492. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p483
  • Guzhavina T.A., Afanas’ev D.V., Vorob’eva I.N. et al. (2018). Regional’nyi sotsial’nyi kapital v usloviyakh krizisa: monografiya [Regional Social Capital in Crisis: Monograph]. Cherepovets: ChGU.
  • Guzhavina T.A., Vorobeva I.N. (2018). Interpersonal trust in the structure of social capital. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2(42). DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.5 (in Russian).
  • Heertje A. (2006). Schumpeter on the Economics of Innovation and the Development of Capitalism. Cheltenham: Elgar.
  • Kirdina S.G. (2003). Social changes. In: Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. T. 2 [The Sociological Encyclopedia. Volume 2] (in Russian).
  • Maslennikova A.Yu., Lapaev S.P. (2012). A high level of creativity as a creativity as a determinant of innovation development of the region. Vestnik OGU=Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, 13, 237–243 (in Russian).
  • McCraw T.K. (2007). Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Mekhova A.A. (2017). Foresight as an innovative forecasting technology and a form of social participation. In: Navstrechu budushchemu. Prognozirovanie v sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: mat-ly VII mezhdunar. sotsiol. Grushinskoi konferentsii [Toward the Future. Forecasting in Sociological Research: Materials of the 7th Grushin International Sociological Conference]. Moscow: VTsIOM (in Russian).
  • Merzlyakov A.A. (2014). Social participation as an object of sociological analysis. In: Modernizatsiya otechestvennoi sistemy upravleniya: analiz tendentsii i prognoz razvitiya: mat-ly Vseros. nauchn.-prakt. konf. i XII–XIII Dridzevskikh chtenii [Modernization of the Russian Management System: Analysis of Trends and Development Forecast: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference and 12th–13th Dridze Readings]. Moscow: IS RAN (in Russian).
  • Newton K., Giebler H. (2008). Patterns of Participation: Political and Social Participation in 22 Nations. Discussion Paper SP IV 2008-201. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
  • Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. (2017). Civic participation: Features of discourse and actual trends of development. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya=Polis. Political Studies, 6, 43–60. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.06.04 (in Russian).
  • Petrenko E.S. (2011). Lifestyle and historical memory of Russians about the events of 1985–1999. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring), 5(105), 73–80 (in Russian).
  • Pilyasov A.N, Kolesnikova O.Yu. (2008). Evaluation of creativity of the Russian regional communities. Voprosy ekonomiki, 9, 50–69. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2008-9-50-69 (in Russian).
  • Putnam R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. The Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
  • Rimskaya O.N., Anokhov I.V., Kranbikhler V.S. (2021). Human capital in industry 4.0. Present and future. Ekonomika nauki=The Economics of Sciences, 7(4), 275–289. DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-4-275-289 (in Russian).
  • Sadovaya E.S., Sautkina V.A., Zenkov A.R. (2019). Formirovanie novoi sotsial'noi real’nosti: tekhnologicheskie vyzovy [Formation of a New Social Reality: Technological Challenges]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN. DOI: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0564-2
  • Schumpeter J. A. (1949). Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shkaratan O.I. (2008). A new middle class and information workers on Russian labor market. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1, 5–27 (in Russian).
  • Shkaratan O.I. (2009). Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoi Rossii [Socio-Economic Inequality and Its Reproduction in Contemporary Russia]. Moscow.
  • Skalaban I.A. (2011). Social, public and civic participation: The problem of conceptual understanding and misunderstanding. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya=Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political, 1, 130–139 (in Russian).
  • Sokolov A.V., Barskiy Ya.V. (2021). Development of civil engagement in Russia in the conditions of digital transformation. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, politologiya, sotsiologiya=Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: History. Political Science. Sociology, 2, 68–74 (in Russian).
  • Sztompka P. (1996). Sotsiologiya sotsial’nykh izmenenii: per. s angl [The Sociology of Social Change: Translated form English]. Moscow.
  • Trubitsyn O.K. (2019). Creatosphere development in information society. Filosofiya i gumanitarnye nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve=Philosophy and Humanities in Information Society, 2(24), 29–49 (in Russian).
  • Tsalikova I.K., Pakhotina S.V. (2019). Scientific research on the issue of soft skills development (review of the data in international databases of Scopus, Web of Science). Obrazovanie i nauka=The Education and Science Journal, 21(8), 187–207. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-7-187-207 (in Russian).
  • Uvarina N.V., Savchenkov A.V. (2021). Of flexible skills of young people in the conditions of social partnership. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovatsionnyi aspekt=Contemporary Higher Education: Innovative Aspects, 1, 78–85. DOI: 10.7442/2071-9620-2021-13-1-78-85 (in Russian).
  • Verba S., Nie N., Kim J. (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Volkov Yu.G. (2010). Creative class: Search for a sociological concept. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya, 9, 43–60 (in Russian).
  • Volkov Yu.G. (2013). Creative class as the integrating core of Russian society. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Sciences, 2, 76–92 (in Russian).
  • Volkov Yu.G. (2014). Creative class and the Russian state: Prospects and cooperation. Vlast’=The Authority, 3, 12–17 (in Russian).
  • Volkov Yu.G. (2020). New social elevators in the regional space. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya, 18, 131–159. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2020.6 (in Russian).
  • Yadov V.А. (2001). Social resource of individuals and groups as their capital: The possibility of applying a universal methodology for the study of real stratification in Russian society. In: Kto i kuda stremitsya vesti Rossiyu? [Who is Trying to Lead Russia and Where?]. Moscow: MVShSEN (in Russian).
  • Zaytseva A.S. (2021). The impact of digital competencies of small and medium-sized business on business development. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo=Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 11(2), 313–322. DOI: 10.18334/epp.11.2.111640 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная