«Axiological objectivity» of the system of value orientations of «transcendental reality», culture, nature in phenomenology and neokantianity

The phenomenological definition of E. Husserl "axiological objectivity" as the awareness of an object in its value dimension is revealed. The presented category presupposes the ratio of "objectivity" to the value itself in the context of phenomenology and neo-Kantianism. In this regard, it has been clarified that there is no absolute identity between value and objectivity. G. Rickert's neo-Kantian concept shows that transcendental values do not correspond to objectivity, and natural objects are not values. Cultural objects are only associated with values. Nevertheless, according to I. Kant, ideal values correspond to objectivity as “transcendental spiritual objects”. Also, culture and nature are related to values as a means. In the presented context, "axiological objectivity" is related to ideas, culture and nature, which corresponds to certain value orientations. It was found out that the ideal "objects-values", "superthings" are not comprehensible, not realizable, "points in infinity" acting as reference points for culture. It is determined that the "values of culture" are not only phenomenologically comprehensible, but are also the results of human activity as "objective values of accomplishment". The values of nature are subjective, are objects of interest, and can be used as means. When exposed to the values presented - human activities, they can be transformed into a culture aspiring to ideas.