An estimate of the ecological risc. Analitical review of Publications

Автор: Dmitriev V.G.

Журнал: Arctic and North @arctic-and-north

Рубрика: Ecology

Статья в выпуске: 14, 2014 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Based on a review of contemporary publications in the article examines the role of modeling in risk assessment examines the concepts of environmental risk, the risk to human health, reveals problems and ecological risk assessment methodology. All of these issues are directly related to the situation in the Arctic.

Review, risk, ecological risks, Arctic, probabilistic risk analysis, environment protection, ecology

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148319872

IDR: 148319872

Список литературы An estimate of the ecological risc. Analitical review of Publications

  • Sornette D., Maillart T., Kroger W. Exploring the limits of safety analysis in complex technological systems / Risk Center, Zurich, 2013. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.5674.pdf.
  • May R. and McLean A. Theoretical Ecology. Principles and Applications / Oxford University Press Inc., New York. 2007. 268 pp.
  • Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology. Second English edition / Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1998. 853 pp.
  • Gillman, M. An introduction to mathematical models in ecology and evolution: time and space / A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2nd ed. 2009. 167 pp.
  • Марчук Г. И. Математическое моделирование в проблеме окружающей среды / М.: Наука. Главная редакция физико-математической литературы, 1982. 320 с.
  • Авдин В. В. Математическое моделирование экосистем: Учебное пособие / Челябинск: Изд-во ЮУрГУ. 2004. 80 с.
  • Острейковский В. А. Математическое моделирование техногенного риска от эксплуатации нефтегазового оборудования // Вестник кибернетики. 2012. № 11. С. 71−75.
  • Bieda B. Stochastic Analysis in Production Process and Ecology Under Uncertainty / Berlin, New York: Springer, 2012. 189 pp.
  • Hayes K. R. Uncertainty and Uncertainty Analysis Methods. Final report for the Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis (ACERA) / CSIRO Division of Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, Hobart, Australia. 2011. 130 pp.
  • Dutt L. S., Kurian M. Handling of Uncertainty A Survey // International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2013. Pp. 1−4.
  • Plattner Th., Plapp T. and Hebel B. Integrating public risk perception into formal natural hazard risk assessment // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 471−483, 2006.
  • Vose D. Risk analysis: a quantitative guide / John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 3rd ed. Chichester, 2008. 729 pp.
  • Van Hauwermeiren M., Vose D. and Vanden B Bossche S. A Compendium of Distributions (second edition). 2012. [ebook].
  • Pastorok R. et al. Role of Ecological Modeling in Risk Assessment // Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Vol. 9, No. 4, 2003. Pp. 939−972.
  • Sprenger J. Environmental Risk Analysis: Robustness is Essential for Precaution // Philosophy of Science, 79 (5). 2012. Pp. 881−892.
  • Suter II G.W. Ecological Risk Assessment in the United States Environmental Protection Agency: A Historical Overview // Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2008. Volume 4, Number 3. Pp. 285−289.
  • Fox D. R. and Burgman M. Ecological risk assessment / In Melnick, E. and Everitt, B. (eds)., Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Assessment and Analysis. Pp 1600−1603. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. 2008.
  • Pollard S. J. T. Ecological and public health risks: analysis and management / UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). 2002. Pp. 219−235.
  • Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/630/R-95/002F. 1998. http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/pdfs/ECOTXTBX.PDF.
  • Rak A. et al. A guide to screening level ecological risk assessment / TSERAWG TG-090801. 2008. 26 pp.
  • Guidance for Assessing Ecological Risks Posed by Chemicals: Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment. HWB Guidance Document.Revision 2.0 / New Mexico Environment Department Hazardous Waste Bureau. 2008. 116 pp.
  • Хохлов Н. В. Управление риском / М.: 2001. 239 с.
  • Яковлев В. В. Экологическая безопасность, оценка риска / Санкт-Петербургский государственный политехнический университет, СПб.: 2007. 399 с.
  • Bowen C. Taming the Leviathan A New Approach to Risk for the Military Leader. 2012. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2182321.
  • Ваганов П. А., Ман-Сунг Им. Экологические риски: учеб. пособие. Изд-е 2-е. СПб.: Издво СПбГУ, 2001. 152 с.
  • Шмаль А. Г. Факторы экологической опасности и экологические риски / Издательство: МП «ИКЦ БНТВ», 2010 г., г. Бронницы, 192 с.
  • Nel D. C., et al. Ecological Risk Assessment: A Tool for Implementing an Ecosystem Approach for Southern African Fisheries / WWF South Africa Report Series. 2007. 225 pp.
  • Verdonck F. A. M. et al. Probabilistic ecological risk assessment framework for chemical substances / Proceedings International Conference on Integrated Assessment and Decision Support (iEMSs2002, Lugano, Italy, June 24−27, Vol. 1, 2002. P. 144−149.
  • Ширкин Л. А., Трифонова Т. А. Техногенные системы и экологический риск : учеб. пособие / Владим. гос. ун-т. Владимир: Изд-во Владим. гос. ун-та, 2011. 79 с.
  • Экологическая безопасность. Экологический риск / Пособие по специальности 011600 «Биология», 511100 «Экология и природопользование». Воронеж, 2003. 32 с.
  • Environmental Health Risk Assessment − Guidelines for assessing human health risks from environmental hazards / Environmental Health Committee (enHealth), Canberra. 2012. 131 pp. URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/Publishing.nsf/Content/804F8795BAB FB1C7CA256F1900045479/$File/DoHA-EHRA-120910.pdf.
  • Shoaf I. K. et al. Hazard Risk Assessment Instrument / UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters. 2006. 89 pp.
  • Martin B., Pearson A., Bauer B. An Ecological Risk Assessment of Wind Energy Development in Montana / The Nature Conservancy Helena, Montana. 2009. 57 pp.
  • Schleier III J., Sharlene E. Sing S. and Peterson R. Regional ecological risk assessment for the introduction of Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) into Montana watersheds // Biol Invasions. 2008. 10. Pp. 1277−1287.
  • Guidance for Ecological Risk Assessment: Levels I, II, III, IV. Final / Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 1998. 88 pp.
  • Fairman R. et al. Environmental Risk Assessment − Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources: Environmental issues report No 4. / Prepared at Monitoring and Assessment Research Centre, King's College, London. EEA (European Environment Agency) Copenhagen, Denmark. 1999−2011. URL: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/GH-07-97595-EN-C2/riskindex.html
  • ГОСТ Р 14.09−2005 Руководство по оценке риска в области экологического менеджмента / М.: Стандартинформ. 2010. 41 с.
  • ГОСТ Р 51897−2002 Менеджмент риска. Термины и определения / М.: Госстандарт России. 2002. 12 с.
  • Guidance for Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments / State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Environmental Response and Revitalization. Lazarus Government Center. Columbus, 2008. 130 pp.
  • Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance. Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) / Azimuth Consulting Group Inc., Vancouver. 2012 215 pp.
  • Guidelines on Risk Assessments and Safety Statements / The Health and Safety Authority. 2006, Dublin. 38 pp.
  • Pollard S., Purchase D. and Herbert S. A Practical Guide to Environmental Risk Assessment for Waste Management Facilities.Guidance Note 25. Version: 2 / National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal, Environment Agency. London. 2000. 80 pp.
  • O’Brien G. and Wepener V. Regional-scale risk assessment methodology using the Relative Risk Model (RRM) for surface freshwater aquatic ecosystems in South Africa // Water SA. Vol. 38, No. 2. 2012. Pp. 153−165.
  • Munns W.R. and Jr. Mitro M.G. Assessing risks to populations at Superfund and RCRA sites characterizing effects on populations / EPA/600/R-06/038. ERASC-006. 2006. 88 pp.
  • Woodbury P. and Weinstein D. Review of Methods for Developing Regional Probabilistic Risk Assessments, Part 2: Modeling Invasive Plant, Insect, and Pathogen Species. In: Pye J.M., Rauscher H.M, Sands Y., Lee D.C., Beatty J.S. Advances in threat assessment and their application to forest and rangeland management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-802. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest and Southern Research Stations. 708 p. 2 vol. 2010. Pp. 521−538.
  • Molak V. (ed.). Fundamentals of risk analysis and risk management / CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, New York, London, Tokyo. 1997. 451 pp.
  • Dale V., Meyer J. Advice to EPA on Advancing the Science and Application of Ecological Risk Assessment in Environmental Decision Making: A Report of the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board / U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board, 2007. 163 pp.
  • Janssen C. Putting ecological realism in environmental risk assessment // Report on14th Annual CEFIC-LRI Workshop «Evolution or Revolution – Research priorities for future risk assessment». Brussels, 14−15 November 2012.
  • Suter II, Glenn W., Munns, Wayne R. and Sekizawa. Types of Integration in Risk Assessment and Management, And Why They Are Needed // Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2003, 9:1. Pp. 273−279.
  • Checkai R.T. et al. Selection of Assessment and Measurement Endpoints for Ecologincal Risk Assessment // U.S. Army biological technical assistance group. Report # SFIM-AEC-ERTR-2002018. 2002. 9 pp.
  • Addressing the New Challenges for Risk Assessment / SCENIHR, SCCS, SCHER. European Commission: Directorate D: Public Health Systems and Products. 2012. 154 pp.
  • Review of current practices of environmental risk assessment within EFSA. Technicalreport/ EuropeanFoodSafetyAuthority. 2011. 39 pp.
  • Методические рекомендации по разработке и подготовке к принятию проектов технических регламентов / М.: Минэнерго РФ, 2006. 204 с.
  • Frank C., et al. Managing risk in USAF force planning / RAND Corporation, United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001. 2009. 15 pp. http://www.rand.org.
  • Xu L. et al. Nonlinear effect of climate on plague during the third pandemic in China // PNAS. 2011. 6 pp. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1019486108.
  • Zhou Y. et al. A New Approach to Ecological Risk Assessment: Simulating Effects of Global Warming on Complex Ecological Networks // Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. 2011. Pp. 342−350.
  • Dessai S. and Sluijs J. van der. Uncertainty and Climate Change Adaptation a Scoping Study / Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Department of Science Technology and Society. Report NWS-E-2007-198. Utrecht. 2007. 97 pp.
  • Abaza H., Bisset R., Sadler B. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach / United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva. 2004. 263 pp.
  • Aramă M. et al. Advantages of new ecological impact and risk assessment models // U. P. B. Sci. Bull. Series D, Vol. 72, Iss.3, 2010. Pp. 213−222.
  • Yager R., Kacprzyk J. and Fedrizzi M. Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence / Wiley, 1994. 608 pp.
  • Improvement of Risk Assessment in View of the Needs of Risk Managers and Policy Makers / SCENIHR, SCCS, SCHER. European Commission: Directorate D: Public Health Systems and Products. 2012. 75 pp.
  • Benson S. Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Development: Challenges and Experience in the Philippines /Geneva, Provention Consortium. 2009. 60 pp.
  • A Risk Management Standard / AIRMIC, ALARM, IRM: 2002. 14 p.
  • Slimak M. W., Dietz T. Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception // Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2006. Pp. 1689−1705.
  • Dunlap R. E. The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use // The Journal of Environmental Education. Volume 40, Issue 1, 2008. Pp. 3−18.
Еще
Статья научная