Analysis of students' innovative behavior strategies
Автор: Didkovskaya Ya.V., Dulina N.V., Trynov D.V.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Social and economic development
Статья в выпуске: 6 т.17, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The relevance of the research is determined by the need to study the influence of subjective factors and socio-cultural characteristics of actors on the realization of their innovative potential in the current conditions of tightening sanctions policy in the field of high technologies by Western countries. The aim of the study was to find a connection between the types of professional strategies formed by university students and their innovative practices within the framework of university activity. Innovative activity and features of professional strategies are analyzed in a regional context - using the example of three large industrial centers - Yekaterinburg, Tyumen and Volgograd, as well as two metropolitan cities - Moscow and Saint Petersburg. To study the innovative behavior of students, the authors use an activity-based approach, considering innovative activity as a social quality of a subject, implying its internal readiness to master, use, disseminate and create innovations, and highlighting the levels of innovative activity - innovative receptivity and innovative readiness. The conclusions of the article are based on the results of an empirical sociological survey of students of 2-3 undergraduate courses of leading universities of the studied megacities (N=1050), the selection was carried out according to a quota-nest sample). According to the results obtained, a significant part of the regional students is not involved in any types of innovative practices. Students of megacities especially regional are characterized, first, by insufficient innovative activity at the basic level (participation in grant competitions, scientific conferences and seminars, research practices), and second, by a low degree of involvement in scientific and technological creativity and business design. Using the clustering procedure, a typology of students' professional strategies has been developed, five types of strategies have been identified: “professional employment”, “academic career”, “delayed self-determination”, “emigration and uncertainty” and “independent entrepreneurial”. Using correlation analysis methods, it was found that, first, the “academic career” strategy, which promotes active research and inventive practices, and, second, the “independent entrepreneurial” strategy, which correlates with the active implementation of innovative practices in business planning, development of creative and start-up projects, have the greatest innovative potential. “Emigration and uncertainty strategy” is less associated with active innovative activity and is characterized by the lack of formation of professional plans for the near future and intentions to seek work abroad. The “professional employment” strategy, which does not promote active innovative and creative practices, also has low potential. It is pointed out that the dissemination of latest strategies reduces the potential contribution of students to the innovative component of the Russian economy.
Innovative activity, professional strategies, student youth, quantitative survey, cluster analysis
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147247147
IDR: 147247147 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.6.96.15
Список литературы Analysis of students' innovative behavior strategies
- Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Life Strategy]. Moscow: Mysl'.
- Bannikova L.N., Ermakov M.A. (2020). Innovative susceptibility of students of regional technical universities: Sociological analysis. Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 1, 113–125. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2020.1.9 (in Russian).
- Barrett A.E., Barbee H. (2022). The subjective life course framework: Integrating life course sociology with gerontological perspectives on subjective aging. Adv Life Course Res, 51, 100448. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2021.100448
- Becker G.S. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Belogortseva I.E., Posokhova N.V., Merezhko M.E. (2015). Development of inventive activity in higher school as a factor of increase of intellectual potential of region. Vestnik TGU, 3(3), 50–55 (in Russian).
- Bizhoev B.M. (2019). Innovative forms of investment attraction in the digital economy. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki=Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 9(3), 647–656. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.9.3.40945 (in Russian).
- Bovenberg A.L. (2008). The life-course perspective and social policies: An overview of the issues. Cesifo Economic Studies, 54(4), 593–641. DOI:10.1093/cesifo/ifn029
- Buhl H.M., Noack P., Kracke B. (2018). The role of parents and peers in the transition from university to work life. Journal of Career Development, 45(6), 523–535. DOI: 10.1177/0894845317720728
- Buzgalin A.V. (2017). Creative economy: Private intellectual property or ownership by everybody of everything? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 7, 43–53. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517070054 (in Russian).
- Clausen J.A. (1993). American Lives. New York: Free Press.
- Deev A.S., Krasovskaya N.V., Chernomorchenko S.I. (2022). Tyumen: Experience of post-industrial transformation of the city space. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, 78, 26–31. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/78/4 (in Russian).
- Dezhina I.G., Klyucharev G.A. (2018). Russian education for innovative economy: “The pressure points” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 40–48. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250001957-5 (in Russian).
- Didkovskaya Ya.V., Trynov D.V., Chistyakov P.A. (2023). Students’ professional strategies in the context of the image of the social future. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 63–77. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250027778-8 (in Russian).
- Drozdova J.A. (2023). Implementation of the Smart City concept in population estimates (on the example of Volgograd). Nauchnyi rezul'tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie=Research Result. Sociology and Management, 9(1), 59–70. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338- 2023-9-1-0-6 (in Russian).
- Erokhina E.V. (2015). Innovative activity in the region: Challenges, assessment, and reinforcement resources. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2, 22–28 (in Russian).
- Etzkowitz H., Dzisah J., Albats E., Cai Y., Outamha R. (2023). Entrepreneurship and innovation in the Triple Helix: The perspicacity of intermediate ties. Industry and Higher Education, 37(6), 753–761.
- Evans K., Furlong A. (1997). Metaphors of youth transitions: Neches, pathways, trajectories or navigations. In: Bynner J., Chisholm L., Furlong А. (Eds.). Youth, Citizenship and Social Change in a European Context. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Florida R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
- Frolova I.A. (2015). Innovative activity of young entrepreneurs as a competitiveness factor of innovation start ups in Russia (on materials of Kazan State Technological University). Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem, 1(1), 68–71 (in Russian).
- Glazyev S.Yu., Kosakyan D.L. (2024). State and prospects of 6th technological mode in Russian economy. Ekonomika nauki=Economics of Science, 10(2), 11–29. DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-2-11-29 (in Russian).
- Gokhberg L.M., Kuznetsova T.E. (2011). Strategy 2020: New outlines of Russian innovation policy. Forsait=Foresight-Russia, 5(4).
- Karacharovskii V.V., Shkaratan O.I. (2019). Different goals of the same society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 1, 5–17. DOI: 10.31857/S. 013216250003743-0 (in Russian).
- Kisilenko A.V., Shapovalova I.S. (2023). Designing the course of life or how do youth see their future? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2, 83–94. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250024385-6 (in Russian).
- Klyucharev G.A., Chursina A.V. (2021). Hightech industries for an innovative economy: Expert opinions. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya “Sotsiologiya”, 21(1), 68–83. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-1-68-83 (in Russian).
- Landry C. (2000). The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovation. Earthscan Ltd, UK&USA.
- Lobareva N.S., Malinkin S.V., Glukhikh P.L. (2018). Сhallenges and prospects of youth start-up movement research as a new trend of Russian entrepreneurship development. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika”=Perm University Herald. Economy, 13(4), 602–622. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2018-4-602-622
- Lugin D.A., Didkovskaya Ya.V. (2022). Creativity as a condition for innovative activity of the younger generation: A theoretical review and analysis of modern concepts. In: Bagirova A.P. (Ed.) Strategii razvitiya sotsial'nykh obshchnostei, institutov i territorii: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. T. 1 [Strategies for the Development of Social Communities, Institutions and Territories: Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Vol. 1]. Yekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta (in Russian).
- Milyuchikhina O.A. (2020). Analysis of motivation of Russian youth to participate in innovation activities. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii vestnik, 3(2), 288–291 (in Russian).
- Mincer J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281–302.
- Mortimer J.T. (2022). Agency, linked lives and historical time: Evidence from the longitudinal three-generation Youth Development Study. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 13(2), 195–216. DOI: 10.1332/175795921X16398283564306
- Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I., Sheludkov A.V. (2022). A multi-scale approach to identifying spatial inequality in Russia as incentive and obstacle in development. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 86(3), 289–309. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556622030128 (in Russian).
- Omelchenko E.L. (2023). Imaginary horizons of the future. Life orientations and migration plans of the youth of the North-West region of Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 12, 121–135. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029342-9 (in Russian).
- Reznik Yu.M., Smirnov E.A. (2002). Zhiznennye strategii lichnosti (opyt kompleksnogo analiza [Personal Life Strategies (Experience of Complex Analysis]. Moscow: Institut cheloveka RAN. Nezavisimyi institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva.
- Singh S., Aggarwal Y. (2021). In search of a consensus definition of innovation: A qualitative synthesis of 208 definitions using grounded theory approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 177–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1925526
- Strand O., Ivanova I., Leydesdorff L. (2017). Decomposing the Triple-Helix synergy into the regional innovation systems of Norway: Firm data and patent networks. Quality & Quantity, 51(3), 963–988. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0344-z
- Stromov V.Yu., Sysoev P.V. (2017). Main vectors of organization of students’ scientific and research activity at Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki=Tambov University Review. Series Humanities, 22(5)(169). DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-5(169)-7-17 (in Russian).
- Sushchaya E.S. (2022). Large cities as epicenters of social and economic dynamics of Southern macroregion: The first quarter of the 21st century. Regional'naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii=Regional economy. The South Of Russia, 10(4), 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2022.4.11 (in Russian).
- Tonkikh N.V., Verbenskaya A.V., Kamarova T.A. (2023). Rating of million-strong cities of the Russian Federation by parameters of parental well-being. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki=The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 15(6). Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/37ECVN623.pdf (in Russian).
- Vasilyeva E.E. (2019). The role of the standup science in the research activities of students. Vestnik SPbGIK, 4(41), 23–27. DOI: 10.30725/2619-0303-2019-4-23-27 (in Russian).
- Vishnevsky Yu.R., Vishnevsky S.Yu. (2012). Professional choice of students and resource-based approach: The potential for implementation. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki, 1(25), 22–27 (in Russian).
- Zubok J.A., Chuprov V.I. (2020). Youth life strategies: Implementation of expectations and social moods. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 13–41 (in Russian).