Common inaccuracies and errors in the application of statistical methods in soil science
Автор: Samsonova V. P., Meshalkina J. L.
Журнал: Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева @byulleten-esoil
Рубрика: Статьи
Статья в выпуске: 102, 2020 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The most common inaccuracies and errors in the application of statistical methods found in Russian publications on soil science are considered. When designating random variables and distribution parameters in Greek letters, it is necessary to designate those that refer to general populations, and Latin letters - to sampling ones. A detailed description of the experiment and what the replications relate to allows you to draw correct conclusions from the study. It is necessary to avoid pseudoreplication when results at closely located sampling points are considered as characteristics of soil variability over large distances. Expanding the list of descriptive statistics will allow you to use a specific study in meta-analysis. Calculating the confidence interval for the average using the Student's test at different significance levels expands the scope of possible values of the average, but this approach is justified only if the indicator does not differ too much from the normal distribution...
Statistics designations, pseudoreplication, significance level, confidence interval, hypothesis testing, criterion power, correlation coefficient
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143171144
IDR: 143171144 | DOI: 10.19047/0136-1694-2020-102-164-182