Цитогеография марей европейской России в связи с инвазивным аспектом

Бесплатный доступ

Изучены встречаемость разных хромосомных чисел видов Chenopodium в трех популяциях: на севере, в средней части и на юго-востоке европейской России, процентное соотношение диплоидов и тетраплоидов и их биоклиматическая и экогеографическая приуроченность. Выявленная в нашем исследовании закономерность распределения плоидности подтверждает большую экологическую пластичность и инвазионность тетраплоидов по сравнению с диплоидами. Гипотеза о преимущественном распространении полиплоидов в северных широтах для Chenopodium не подтвердилась.

Цитогеография, цитотипы, диплоиды, тетраплоиды, chenopodium, гибридизация, эволюция

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148327885

IDR: 148327885

Список литературы Цитогеография марей европейской России в связи с инвазивным аспектом

  • Buggs R.J.A., Pannell J.R. Ecological differentiation and diploid superiority across a moving ploidy contact zone // Evolution. 2007. Vol. 61(1). P. 125–140.
  • Cavanagh C.R., Chao S., Wang S., Huang B.E., Stephen S., Kiani S. et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2013. Vol. 110(20). P. 8057–8062.
  • Čertner M, Fenclová E., Kúr P., Kolář F., Koutecký P., Krahulcová A. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations in an annual herb: dispersal, local persistence and recurrent origins of polyploids // Ann Bot. 2017. Vol. 120(2). P. 303–315.
  • Husband B.C., Sabara H.A. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) // New Phytol. 2003. Vol. 161(3). P. 703–713.
  • Kolano B., Siwinska D., Mccann J., Weiss-Schneeweiss H. The evolution of genome size and rDNA in diploid species of Chenopodium s.l. (Amaranthaceae) // Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2015. Vol. 179. P. 218–235.
  • Kolano B., Mccann J., Orzechowska M., Siwinska D., Temsch E., Weiss-Schneeweiss H. Molecular and cytogenetic evidence for an allotetraploid origin of Chenopodium quinoa and C. berlandieri (Amaranthaceae) // Mol. Phylogen. And Evol. 2016. Vol. 100. P. 109–123.
  • Krak K., Nelyayev A., Douda J., Hreusova L., Mandák B. Allopolyploid origin of Chenopodium album s.str. (Chenopodiaceae): a molecular and cytogenetic insight // Plos one. 2016. August 11. P. 1–22.
  • Kolář F., Čertner M., Suda J., Schönswetter P., Husband B.C. Mixed-ploidy species: progress and opportunities in polyploidy research // Trends Plant Sci. 2017. Vol. 22(12). P. 1041–1055.
  • Lafuma L., Balkwill K., Imbert E., Verlaque R., Maurice S.. Ploidy level and origin of the European invasive weed Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae) // Plant Syst. Evol. 2003. Vol. 43(1-2). P. 59–72.
  • Leitch I.J., Bennett M.D. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants // Biol. J. Linn. 2004. Vol. 82(4). P. 651–663.
  • Leitch I.J., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Bennett M.D. Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (Embryophyta) // Ann. Bot. 2005. Vol. 95(1). P. 207–217.
  • Linder H.P., Barker N.P. Does polyploidy facilitate long-distance dispersal? // Ann. Bot. 2014. Vol. 113(7). P. 1175–1183.
  • Mandáková T., Joly S., Krzywinski M., Mummenhoff K., Lysak M.A. Fast diploidization in close mesopolyploid relatives of Arabidopsis // Plant Cell. 2010. Vol. 22(7). P. 2277–2290.
  • Mráz P., Bourchier R.S., Treier U.A., Schaffner U., Mu¨ller-Schärer H. Polyploidy in phenotypic space and invasion context: a morphometric study of Centaurea stoebe s.l. // Int. J. Plant Sci. 2011. Vol. 172(3). P. 386–402.
  • Nassar N.M.A. Production of triploid cassava, Manihot esculenta Crantz by hybrid diploid gametes // Field Crops Res. 1992. Vol. 30(1-2). P. 173–182.
  • Nassar N.M.A. The synthesis of a new cassava-derived species, Manihot vieiri Nassar // Genet Mol Res. 2006. Vol. 5(3). P. 536–541.
  • Nӗmečková H., Krak K., Chrtek J. Complex pattern of ploidal and genetic variation in Seseli libanotis (Apiaceae) // Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2019. Vol. 56. P. 57–77.
  • Obbard D.J., Harris S.A., Buggs R.J.A., Pannell J.R. Hybridization, polyploidy, and the evolution of sexual systems in Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae) // Evolution. 2006. Vol. 60(9). P. 1801.
  • Otisková et al., Otisková V, Koutecký T, Kolář F, Koutecký P. Occurrence and habitat preferences of diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe in the Czech Republic. Preslia. 2014; 86: 67–80.
  • Otto S.P., Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution // Annu Rev Genet. 2000. 34(1). P. 401–437.
  • Pustovoitova T., Eremin G., Rassvetaeva E., Zhdanova N., Zholkevich V. Drought resistance, recovery capacity, and phytohormone content in polyploid plum leaves // Russ. J. Plant. Physiol. 1996. Vol. 43(2). P. 232–235.
  • Renny-Byfield S., Kovarik A., Kelly L.J., Macas J., Novak P., Chase M.W. et al. Diploidization and genome size change in allopolyploids is associated with differential dynamics of low- and high-copy sequences // Plant J. 2013. Vol. 74(5). P. 829–839.
  • Rosche C., Hensen I., Lachmuth S. Local pre-adaptation to disturbance and inbreeding-environment interactions affect colonisation abilities of diploid and tetraploid Centaurea stoebe // Plant Biol. 2018. Vol. 20(1). P. 75–84.
  • Rosche C., Hensen I., Mráz P., Durka W., Hartmann M., Lachmuth S. Invasion success in polyploids: the role of inbreeding in the contrasting colonization abilities of diploid versus tetraploid populations of Centaurea stoebe s.l. // J. Ecol. 2017. Vol. 105(2). P. 425–435.
  • Rothera S.L., Davy A.J. Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in Deschampsia cespitosa // New Phytol. 1986. Vol. 102(3). P. 449–467.
  • Salmon A., Ainouche M.L., Wendel J.F. Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae) // Mol. Ecol. 2005. Vol. 14(4). P. 1163–1175.
  • Schonswetter P., Suda J., Popp M., Weiss-Schneeweiss H., Brochmann C. Circumpolar phylogeography of Juncus biglumis (Juncaceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints, cpDNA sequences, nuclear DNA content and chromosome numbers // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007. Vol. 42(1). P. 92–103.
  • Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Tate J.A. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation // New Phytol. 2003. Vol. 161(1). P. 173–191.
  • Suda J., Meyerson L.A., Leitch I.J., Pysˇek P. The hidden side of plant invasions: the role of genome size // New Phytol. 2015. Vol. 205(3). P. 994–1007.
  • te Beest M., Le Roux J.J., Richardson D.M., Brysting A.K., Suda J., Kubešová M, et al. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions // Ann. Bot. 2012. Vol. 109(1). P. 19–45.
  • Tӗšitelová T., Jersáková J., Roy M., Kubátová B., Těšitel J., Urfus T. et al. Ploidy-specific symbiotic interactions: divergence of mycorrhizal fungi between cytotypes of the Gymnadenia conopsea group (Orchidaceae) // New Phytol. 2013. Vol. 199(4). P. 1022–1033.
  • Wolfe K.H. Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization // Nat Rev Genet. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 333–341.
Еще
Статья