Collective actions and social capital: implication of concepts

Автор: Guzhavina Tatyana A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social development

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.13, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Collective actions are the basis of social interaction. Collective action is defined as the system of organized individuals, who are included in groups, which have a certain degree of organization. The pecularity of collective activities is the fact that almost all people are involved in them, in one form or another. One of the first sociologists, who started the study of collective activities, was M. Weber. It was him who designated a collective action as a social one. While studying consumer behavior, economists also paid attention to collective activities of people (E. Ostrom). The result was the emergence of the social action concept in Sociology and the theory of collective action in Economics. Later, the number of researchers and studied problems in the context of a collective action expanded. Economists and sociologists were joined by psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, biologists, and others. The theory of collective action allows us to explain a wide range of social life phenomena. This concept is closely related to the theory of social capital, which emerged at the intersection of economic and social sciences. Social capital is a factor that determines the intensity, effectiveness, and mass scale of collective actions. However, social capital itself is formed under the influence of collective actions. In foreign science, the problems of collective action and social capital are considered interrelated. In domestic social science, it is yet to be achieved. The theory of social capital has the umbrella effect, which allows searching for opportunities of theoretical and methodological integration of social capital components and forms of collective actions. The purpose of this article is to show, on the basis of the overview of the main research areas of social capital and collective actions in scientific literature, the most promising points of their contact for studying social reality in Russia. It includes the research of subjects of collective actions, transformation of their goals, the enrichment of the repertoire due to the emergence of new practices and the usage of virtual space. The important aspect is the environment for the implementation of collective actions, which forms their target orientation. The implication of concepts of social capital and collective action should allow us to identify aspects of mutual influence between them.

Еще

Collective actions, subjects of collective actions, repertoire of collective actions, social capital, types of social capital, social reality

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147225436

IDR: 147225436   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.11

Список литературы Collective actions and social capital: implication of concepts

  • Tilly C. From Mobilization to Revolution. MA: Addison, 1978. 349 p.
  • Medina L.F. A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change, Analytical Perspectives on Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007. 271 p.
  • Earl J., Kimport, К. Digitally Enabled Social Change. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2011. 257 p.
  • Afanasiev D.V. Studying of the role of social capital in terms of socio-economic crisis. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, 2015, no. 4(40), pp. 88–108. (In Russian).
  • Putnam R. Helliwell J. Economic Growth and Social Capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 1995, no. 21 (3), рр. 295–307.
  • Putnam R. Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. 544 p.
  • 7 Granovetter V.S. The Strength of Week Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 1973, vol. 78, no. 6, рр. 1360–1380.
  • Pichler F., Wallace C. Patterns of Formal and Informal Social Capital in Europe. European Sociological Review, 2007, vol. 23, no. 4, рр. 423–435.
  • Bourdieu P. Forms of capital. Economic sociology=Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 2002, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 60–74. Available at: www.ecsoc.msses.EN (accessed: 12.07.2019). (In Russian).
  • Lin N. Social Capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, 2001. 270 p.
  • Coleman J. The Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 1993.
  • Coleman J. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988–89, vol. 94, рр. 95–120.
  • Panebianco S. The impact of social capital on regional economic development. ACSP-AESOP Congress. Germany: Universität Kassel, 2013, рр. 8–12.
  • Blume L., Sack D. Patterns of social capital in West German regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2008, no. 15, рр. 229–248.
  • Callois J.M, Schmitt B. The role of social capital components on local economic growth: Local cohesion and openness in French rural areas. Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 2009, no. 90 (3), рр. 257–286.
  • Dzialek J. Is social capital useful for explaining economic development in polish regions? Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geograph, 2014, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 177–193.
  • Knack S., Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, no. 112.4, pp. 1251–1288.
  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Schleifer A., Vishny R.W. Trust in Large Organizations. American Economic Review, 1997, vol. 87, рр. 333–338.
  • Jones B.J. Social Capital in American life, 2017. 147 p.
  • Hall P. Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 1999, June, no. 29(03), рр. 417–461.
  • Ding W., Jimoh S.O., Hou Y., Hou X., Zhang W. Influence of livelihood capitals on livelihood strategies of herdsmen in inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2018, vol. 10 (9), рр. 1–17.
  • Czaller L. Increasing social returns to human capital: Evidence from Hungarian regions Regional Studies, 2017, vol. 51(3), рр. 467–477.
  • Di Caro P. Testing and explaining economic resilience with an application to Italian regions. Papers in Regional Science, 2017, vol. 96 (1), рр. 93–113.
  • Petzold, J. Social adaptability in ecotones: Sea-level rise and climate change adaptation in flushing and the isles of scilly, UK (2018). Island Studies Journal, 2018, no. 13 (1), рр. 101–118.
  • Moore S., Daniel M., Paquet C., Dube L., Gauvin L. Association of individual network social capital with abdominal adiposity, overweight and obesity. Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, no. 1, рр. 175–183.
  • Penning J.M., Lee K. Social Capital of Organization: Conceptualization, Level of Analysis, and Performance Implication. Ed. by R.ThAJ. Leenders, S.M. Gabbay. USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. Pр. 1–49.
  • Leenders R.ThAJ., Gabbay S.M., Fiegenbaum A. Corporate Social Capital and the Strategic Management Paradigm: A Contingency View on Organizational Performance. Research Report. University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM. Groningen, 2001. P. 1–38.
  • Loury G. A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Discussion Papers 255. Northwestern University, 1976. 95 p.
  • Fukuyama F. Velikiy razryv. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AST: Ermak, 2004, 474 p. (Transl. of Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. Simon and Schuster, 2000. 372 p.)
  • Fafchamps M., Minten B. Property rights in flea market economy. Еconomic development and cultural chance, 2001, vol. 49, nо. 2, рр. 229–267.
  • Bowles S., Gintis H. Social Capital and Community Governance. Economic Journal, 2002, vol. 112 (483), рр. 419–436.
  • Knack S., Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, no. 112.4, рр. 1251–1288.
  • Dasgupta P., Sergaldin I. Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.
  • Fedderke J.W., De Kadt R.H.J., Luiz J. Economic Growth and Social Capital. Theory and Society, 1999, no. 28, pp. 709–745.
  • Wilson W.J. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. 320 p.
  • Putnam, R.D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
  • Ostrom, E. Social capital: Fad or a fundamental concept? In: Dasgupta, P., Serageldin, I. (Eds.), Social Capital, a Multifaceted Perspective. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2000. 176 p.
  • Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965. 175 p.
  • Ostrom E. Collective Action Theory. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Poliltcs, 2009. P. 186–208.
  • Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 280 p.
  • Opp K-D. Collective identity, rationality and collective political action. Rationality and Society, 2012, no. 24 (1), рр. 73–105.
  • Jenkins R. Social Identity. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004. 256 p.
  • Ranciere J. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 168 p.
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975. 578 p.
  • McCarthy J., Zald M. Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, vol. 82, рр.1212–1241.
  • Wahlstrom M., Wennerhag M. Alone in the crowd: Lone protesters in Western European demonstrations. International Sociology, 2014, vol. 29 (6), рр. 565–583.
  • Ido A. The effect of social capital on collective action in community forest management in Cambodia. International Journal of the Commons, 2019, no. 13 (1), рр. 777–803.
  • Jicha K., Thompson G., Fulkerson G., May J. Individual Participation in Collective Action in the Context of a Caribbean Island State: Testing the Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Social Capital. Rural Sociology, 2011, no. 76 (2), рр. 229–256.
  • Van Laerhoven F. Governing Community Forests and the Challenge of Solving Two-level Collective Action Dilemmas – A Large-N Perspective. Global Environmental Change 20, 2010. Pр. 539–546.
  • Di Caro P. Testing and explaining economic resilience with an application to Italian regions. Papers in Regional Science, 2017, no. 96 (1), рр. 93–113.
  • Ramos-Pinto P. Social Capital as a Capacity for Collective Action. Assessing Social Capital: Concept, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing in association with GSE Research, 2012. Pp. 53–69.
  • Young-Yong K. Effects of Social Capital on Collective Action for Community Development. Social Behaviour and Personality: An international journal, 2018, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1011–1028.
  • Adger N.W. Social capital? Collective action and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 2003, vol.79, no. 4, рр. 387–404.
  • Simon B., Klandermans B. Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 2001, vol. 56, рр. 319–331.
  • Duncan L.E. The psychology of collective action. The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Eds K. Deaux, M. Snyder. N.Y., 2012. Pp. 781–803.
  • Gibbs A., Campbell C., Akintola, O., Colvin C. Social contexts and building social capital for collective action: Three case studies of volunteers in the context of HIV and AIDS in South Africa. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2014, vol. 25 (2), pp. 110–122.
  • Boixi C. and Posner D. Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance. British Journal of Political Science, 1998, vol. 28, issue 04, рр. 686–694.
  • Polishchuk L., Menyashev R. Economic significance of social capital. Voprosy Economiki=Issues of Economics, 2011, no. 12, pp. 46–65. (In Russian).
  • Nemirovsky V.G., Nemirovskaya A.V. Social’naya struktura i social’niy kapital naseleniya Krasnoyarskogo kraya: monografiya [Social structure and social capital of the Krasnoyarsk Krai: Monograph]. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. Feder. Un-t, 2011, 159 p. (In Russian).
  • Gabidinova G.S. Content and structure of social capital of the territory. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal=Economic journal, 2013, no. 3, pp. 118–125. (In Russian).
  • Kurbatova M.V., Levin S.N., Kagan E.S. Structure of social capital as a factor of institutional development of the region. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’=Public Sciences and modernity, 2010, no. 6, pp. 37–51. (In Russian).
  • Rzayeva S.V., Reshetnikova S.A. Social network as the basis of social capital: content and approaches to the study. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnyh i social’no-ekonomicheskih nauk=Actual problems of the humanities and socio-economic sciences, 2014, no. 1 (8), pp. 113–122. (In Russian).
  • Kolpina L.V., Vangorodskaya S.A. Barriers to the formation of social capital networks in the regional community (on materials of focus-groups). Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo=Scientific Bulletin. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 2013, no. 23 (166), vol. 26, pp. 60–70. (In Russian).
  • Sokolov A.V. Collective action: approaches to understanding and organization features (bibliographic review of foreign literature). Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie=Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2018, no. 2, pp. 113–122. (In Russian).
  • Seleznev P.A. Protest movement in modern Russia. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta=Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2010, no. 3, pp. 334–338. (In Russian).
  • Budanov M.A. Influence of social capital on the effectiveness of collective action: traditions and prospects. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo)=Moscow University Bulletin. Series 21. Public Administration, 2005, no. 4, pp. 111–125. (In Russian).
Еще
Статья научная