Communicative concept of the social contract and formation of the course of economic development

Communicative concept of the social contract and formation of the course of economic development

Автор: Dementiev V.E.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents the communicative concept of the social contract. This concept focuses not on reaching a compromise, but on bringing the parties closer together during the discussion of their positions. Mutual understanding regarding the desired future of the socio-economic system is a necessary basis for determining the course of economic development with a communicative understanding of the social contract. Such an interpretation of it takes into account that not only the image of the future is important, the process of its joint comprehension, the organizational aspect of this process is no less important. As evidenced by foreign practice, with standard procedures of electoral democracy, state policy is formed under the influence of business-oriented groups, and the influence of the preferences of an ordinary citizen is close to zero. Information technologies have not only dramatically expanded communication capabilities, but also led to the identification of the information elite. The article analyzes the discussion about the influence of this elite on social development, including the discussion of the theory of information autocracy. When mass media leads to increased polarization of society, it increases investment risks and causes a slowdown in economic growth. As foreign studies show, a new technological elite occupies a special position on topical issues of modern socio-economic development. The elite is interested not only in new technological and economic results, but also in social progress. The strong support of the high-tech elite for income redistribution and progressive taxation allows us to take a fresh look at the prospects for the convergence of the positions of social clusters regarding the course of economic development. The communicative concept of the social contract is a suitable basis for the synthesis of ideas of social clusterism and collaborative democracy.

Еще

Social contract, course of economic development, information elite, technological elite, social clusterism, collaborative democracy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241624

IDR: 147241624   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.3

Список литературы Communicative concept of the social contract and formation of the course of economic development

  • Abramowitz A., McCoy J. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137–156.
  • Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. (2006). Economic backwardness in political perspective. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 115–131. DOI:10.1017/S0003055406062046
  • Azzimonti M. (2011). Barriers to investment in polarized societies. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2182–2204. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.2182
  • Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. (2022). Social contract in Russia: Before and after 2022. Journal of Institutional Studies, 3, 74–90. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.3.074-090 (in Russian).
  • Bard A., Söderqvist J. (2004). Netokratiya. Novaya pravyashchaya elita i zhizn' posle kapitalizma [Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism]. Saint Petersburg: Stokgol'mskaya shkola ekonomiki v Sankt-Peterburge.
  • Barro R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
  • Brockmann H., Drews W., Torpey J. (2021). A class for itself? On the worldviews of the new tech elite. PLoS ONE, 16(1), e0244071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244071
  • Broockman D.E., Ferenstein G, Malhotra N. (2019). Predispositions and the political behavior of American economic elites: Evidence from technology entrepreneurs. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 212–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12408
  • Castells M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 29(1), 238–266.
  • Chen S., Urminsky O. (2019). The role of causal beliefs in political identity and voting. Cognition, 188, 27–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.003
  • Ditto P.H., Lopez D.F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584.
  • Easterly W., Levine R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203-50.
  • Enikolopov R., Rochlitz М., Schoors K.J.L., Zakharov N. (2022). The Effect of Independent Online Media in an Autocracy. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4131355. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4131355
  • Erikson R., Mackuen M., Stimson J. (2001). The Macro Polity. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139086912
  • Floridia A. (2013). Participatory Democracy Versus Deliberative Democracy: Еlements for a Possible Theoretical Genealogy. Two Histories, Some Intersections. Paper Presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, Sciences Po, Bordeaux, September 4–7. Available at: https:// ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/71d7f83c-3fe4-4b11-82a2-c151cd3769f4.pdf
  • Frank R.H. (2016). Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Garrison Y.L., Rice A., Liu W.M. (2021). The American meritocracy myth stress: Scale development and initial validation. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(1), 80–105. DOI: 10.1177/0011000020962072
  • Gilens M., Page B. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592714001595
  • Grechikhin V.G. (2020). Problems of social justice and inequality in modern Russian society. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya=Theory and Practice of Social Development, 5(147), 14–17 (in Russian).
  • Guriev S., Treisman D. (2019). Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Per¬spectives, 33(4), 100–127. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.4.100
  • Guriev S., Treisman D. (2020). A theory of informational autocracy. Journal of Public Economics, 186(104158). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104158.
  • Habermas J. (2001). Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii [The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
  • Helberger N. (2020). The political power of platforms: How current attempts to regulate misinformation amplify opinion power. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 842–854. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888
  • Higley J. (2006). Democracy and the elites. Politiya, 2, 22–31 (in Russian).
  • Holcombe R.G. (2021). Elite influence on general political preferences. Journal of Government and Economics, 3(C), 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jge.2021.100021
  • Holcombe R.G. (2023). Following Their Leaders: Political Preferences and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009323178
  • Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V. (2022). A framework for a new Social Contract is being formed in Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(6), 9–34. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.6.84.1 (in Russian).
  • Kern H.L., Hainmueller J. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17(4), 377–399.
  • Littler J. (2017). Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. New York: Routledge.
  • López M., Dubrow J.K. (2020). Politics and inequality in comparative perspective: A research agenda. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(9), 1199–1210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220941234
  • Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polar¬ization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
  • Makarov V.L. (2010). Sotsial'nyi klasterizm. Rossiiskii vyzov [Social Clusterism. Russian Challenge]. Moscow: Biznes Atlas.
  • Markovits D. (2019). The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. New York: Penguin Press.
  • Michels R. (2001). Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
  • Mijs J.B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 7–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051
  • Mikhaylenok O.M., Malysheva G.A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic – new stage of social digital transformation. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye znaniya, 7(1), 28–39 (in Russian).
  • Monroe A.D. (1998). Public opinion and public policy 1980–¬1993. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 6–28.
  • Mullainathan S., Washington E. (2009). Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 86–111.
  • Ostrom E. (2013). Upravlenie obshchim. Evolyutsiya institutsii kollektivnogo deistviya [Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action]. Kiev.
  • Pareto V. (1995). History – the cemetery of the elites. Politicheskaya mysl', 3.
  • Polterovich V.M. (2021). Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy. Voprosy ekonomiki, 52–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2022a). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 1. The Seven of European leaders. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty. tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 31–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.2 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2022b). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership – collaborative advantage. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(3), 42–57. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2 (in Russian).
  • Przeworski A. (2022). Formal models of authoritarian regimes: A critique. Perspectives on Politics, 1–10. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592722002067
  • Rawls J. (2010). Teoriya spravedlivosti [a Theory of Justice]. Second edition. Moscow: URSS; LKI.
  • Rodrik D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. CEPR Discussion Papers 4767. Available at: https://cepr.org/publications/DP4767
  • Srnicek N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Wiley.
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. (2023). Social contract: Historical and contemporary realities in Soviet/Russian society. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(3), 39–53. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.2 (in Russian).
  • Zuboff S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.5
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©