Comparative evaluation of surgical myocardial revascularization using autoarterial and autovenous conduits in patients with coronary artery disease: Hospital outcomes

Автор: Gevorg A. Boyajyan, Sergey A. Donakanyan, Vladimir A. Shvartz, Andrey D. Petrosyan, Anton K. Koasari, Merab K. Sanakoev, Artak Y. Ispiryan, Rasul N. Aygumov, Leo A. Bockeria

Журнал: Saratov Medical Journal @sarmj

Статья в выпуске: 4 Vol.4, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Objective: to evaluate the hospital outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting using autoarterial and autovenous conduits. Materials and Methods. We conducted a randomized clinical trial. We used the left internal thoracic artery for bypassing the anterior interventricular branch in both groups. The remaining conduits were either only the radial artery or the radial artery and great saphenous vein (study group) or solely the great saphenous vein (control group). The investigated outcomes were, among others, in-hospital mortality, Type 5 myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, respiratory failure, bleeding, cardiac arrhythmias, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Results. A sample of 27 patients was randomly distributed among the study group (n=12) and the control group (n=15). According to the perioperative and early postoperative data, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups, except for the duration of stay on artificial ventilation in intensive care unit: in the study group, it was longer than in the control group: 14 (12; 18) h versus 9.3 (5.8; 13) h, p=0.034. The most common complications were cardiac arrhythmias and AKI. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding studied for outcomes. Postoperative hospital stay (expressed as number of bed days) also did not differ statistically significantly between groups. Conclusion. According to our data, in the first days after surgery, the use of the radial artery does not provide significant advantages compared to the use of the great saphenous vein.

Еще

Coronary artery bypass grafting, arterial conduits, venous conduits, coronary artery disease, complications, cardiac surgery

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149146182

IDR: 149146182   |   DOI: 10.15275/sarmj.2024.0404

Список литературы Comparative evaluation of surgical myocardial revascularization using autoarterial and autovenous conduits in patients with coronary artery disease: Hospital outcomes

  • Golukhova EZ. Report on the scientific and clinical activity of Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of the Russian Federation Ministry of Healthcare in 2021 and development prospects. The Bulletin of Bakulev Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2022; 23 (Special Issue): 12–111 (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.24022/1810-0694-2022-23S
  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40 (2): 87–165. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
  • Bockeria LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular Surgery – 2015. Diseases and Congenital Defects of the Circulatory System. Moscow: Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2016. (In Russ.).
  • Bockeria LA, Shvartz VA, Petrosyan AD. Selection of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. One question, many opinions. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022; 64 (1): 9–16. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2022-64-1-9-16
  • Taggart DP. How I deploy arterial grafts. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 7 (5): 690–7. https://www.doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.09.06
  • Izzat MB, West RR, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Coronary artery bypass surgery: Current practice in the United Kingdom. Br Heart J. 1994; 71 (4): 382–5. https://www.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.71.4.382
  • Carpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, et al. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. A technique avoiding pathological changes in grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973; 16 (2): 111–21. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65825-0
  • Martínez-González B, Reyes-Hernández CG, Quiroga-Gar-za A, et al. Conduits used in coronary artery bypass grafting: A review of morphological studies. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 23 (2): 55–65. https://www.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00178
  • Cao C, Manganas C, Horton M, et al. Angiographic outcomes of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 146 (2): 255–61. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.014
  • Bockeria LA, Pursanov MG, Vartanov PV, Losev VV. Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery using various conduits. Bulletin of Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2018; 19 (1): 5–13. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.24022/1810-0694-2018-19-1-5-13
  • Petrosyan AD, Bockeria LA, Shvartz VA, et al. Arterial and venous conduits in CAD surgery. Prospective randomized clinical trial. XXIV Annual Session of Bakulev Center for Cardiovascular Surgery. Bulletin of Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2021; 22 (S3): 51. (In Russ.).
  • Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Association of radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2020; 324 (2): 179–87. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8228
  • Massoth C, Zarbock A, Meersch M. Acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery. Crit Care Clin. 2021; 37 (2): 267–78. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2020.11.009
  • Baeza-Herrera LA, Rojas-Velasco G, Márquez-Murillo MF, et al. Atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery. Fibrilación auricular en cirugía cardíaca. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2019; 89 (4): 348–59. https://www.doi.org/10.24875/ACM.19000134
  • Lawton, JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; (79): e21–129. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.09.025
  • Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE. Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) trial investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: Five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008; 117 (22): 2859–64. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215
  • Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. RADIAL Investigators. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. Engl J Med. 2018; 378 (22): 2069–2077. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
  • Jawitz OK, Cox ML, Ranney D, et al. Outcomes following revascularization with radial artery bypass grafts: Insights from the PREVENT-IV trial. Am Heart J. 2020; (228): 91–7. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.001
  • Dimagli A, Soletti G Jr, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG. J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (5): 2022. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052022
  • Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG, et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: The ROMA trial – Rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52: 1031–40. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx358
Еще
Статья научная