Cross-cultural compositions for landscape contact zones of civilization connections

Автор: Loiko Alexander Ivanovich

Журнал: Сфера культуры @journal-smrgaki

Рубрика: Философия и культура

Статья в выпуске: 2 (4), 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article examines the crossborder dynamics of the intellectual traditions of European civilizational structures using the example of crosscultural compositions in the space of Belarus. The novelty of the research lies in the description of the tendency for the transformation of crosscultural compositions under the influence of historical eras. The phenomena of the Renaissance, the second scholasticism, the Baroque era, Romanticism and Postmodernism are considered. Crosscultural compositions had a constructive beginning that dominated the technologies of the clash of civilizations. This can be seen in the cultural landscape of Belarus. In it, the strategy of the second scholasticism was realized to oust competitors from the cultural space of Belarus with the arguments concerning education and art. The crosscultural composition of Romanticism strengthened the common European tendency in Belarus to integrate elite culture with elements of folk tradition. This contributed to the formation of Orientalism and the active participation of the natives of Belarus in the study of the East. Modernism put an emphasis on the adaptation of visual arts to technogenic reality and on the development of a methodology for dialogue. Vitebsk became a key locus of the crosscultural composition of Modernism.

Еще

Cross-cultural communication, cultural landscape, contact zone, civilization, crosscultural composition, renaissance, second scholasticism, romanticism, modernism, belarus

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170178625

IDR: 170178625   |   DOI: 10.48164/2713-301X_2021_4_38

Список литературы Cross-cultural compositions for landscape contact zones of civilization connections

  • Arutiunova-Fidanian V.A. Armeniia i Vizantiia v VII v.: sinteznaia kontaktnaia zona [Armenia and Byzantium in the 7th century: a synthetic contact zone]. Vizantiiskii vremennik [Byzantine Times], 61, 58-60. (In Russian).
  • Shutova, O. (2014). Again, About Skaryna in Padua: New Possibilities of Reading the Old Documents. In Three Parts: Time and Context; Circumstances; Attendees. Belarusian Review, 26, 17-23.
  • Savinov, R.V. (2010) Epizod iz istorii Kontrreformatsii: Martin Smigletskii [Episode from the history of the Counter-Reformation: Martin Smigletsky]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Christian Academy of Humanities], 11, 3, 70-76. (In Russian).
  • Shmonin, D.V. (2006) VteniRenessansa [In the shadow of the Renaissance]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
  • Blinova, T.B. (2002) Iezuity v Belarusi (Ikh rol' v organizatsii obrazovaniia i prosveshcheniial [Jesuits in Belarus (Their role in the organization of education and enlightenment)]. Grodno: GrSU. (In Russian).
  • Lachterman, D. (1992). Mathematical Construction, Symbolic Cognition and the Infinite Intellect: Reflections on Maimon and Maimonides. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30, 497-522.
  • Miliukov A.P. Znakomstvo s Senkovskim [Acquaintance with Senkovsky]. Istoricheskii vestnik [Historical Bulletin], 1, 1, 151-158. (In Russian).
  • Nasledie mongoloveda O.M. Kovalevskogo i sovremennost' [The successor of the Mongol leader O.M. Kovalevsky and modernity'] (2002). Kazan: Publishing house of KSU. ([In Russian).
  • Hodz'ko A. (1839) Derar. Vostochnaia povest' v stikhakh [Derar. Eastern story in verse]. St. Petersburg: Voennaia tipografiia. (In Russian).
  • Losskii, N.O. (1953) Dostoevskii i ego khristianskoe miroponimanie [Dostoevsky and his Christian worldview]. New York: Chekhov Publishers. (In Russian).
  • Duff, D. (2002). Intertextuality versus Genre Theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the Question of Genre. Paragraph, 25, 1, 54-73.
Еще
Статья научная