Decoupling in environmental and economic development of regions-participants of cross-border cooperation

Автор: Zabelina Irina A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Environmental economics

Статья в выпуске: 1 (61) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Moving towards “green” economy is currently a priority direction for the development of many countries, including Russia. One of the key aspects of the concept of green economy is achieving decoupling or misalignment of economic growth rates, resource consumption and negative environmental impact. The purpose of the article is to analyze the decoupling of negative environmental impact and resource consumption in economic activity in border regions of the Russian East and the entities of the Baikal region with cross-border economic relations with China. The research novelty lies in identifying the possible impact of cross-border position on environmental and economic development of the areas under review. Long-term experience of cooperation with the neighboring state demonstrates that prospects are followed by environmental problems since the economy of Siberian and Far Eastern regions is consistently focused on raw materials. The decoupling coefficient is calculated to identify the misalignment between economic growth rates and environmental pollution...

Еще

Economic development, negative environmental impact, natural resources, environmental capacity, decoupling, regions of cross-border cooperation

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224133

IDR: 147224133   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.15

Список литературы Decoupling in environmental and economic development of regions-participants of cross-border cooperation

  • Navstrechu «zelenoi ekonomike»: puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu i iskoreneniyu bednosti . UNEP, 2011. 45 p. Available at: http://old.ecocongress.info/5_congr/docs/doklad.pdf (accessed: 26.03.2016).
  • Shevchuk A.V. "Zelenaya" ekonomika: perezagruzka . Moscow: Zimorodok, 2017. 448 p.
  • Bobylev S.N., Kudryavtseva O.V., Yakovleva Ye.Yu. Regional priorities of green economy. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2015, no. 2 (42), pp. 148-159. DOI: 0.17059/2015-2-12
  • Glazyrina I.P., Faleichik L.M., Yakovleva K.A. Socioeconomic effectiveness and «green» growth of regional forest use. Geography and Natural Resources, 2015, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 327-334 DOI: 10.1134/S1875372815040022
  • Shang Y., Si Y., Zeng G. Black or green? Economic growth patterns in China under Low Carbon Economy Targets. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 310-317 DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.05.004
  • Victor P. The Kenneth E. Boulding Memorial Award 2014: Ecological economics: A personal journey. Ecological Economics, 2015, vol. 109, pp. 93-100. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.009
  • Bobylev S.N., Goryacheva A.A., Nemova V.I. Project management in green economy. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: elektronnyi Vestnik=Public Administration E-Journal, 2017, no. 64, pp. 34-44..
  • Pyzhev A.I., Pyzheva Yu.I. Evaluation of regional ecological and socio-economic well-being of the Krasnoyarsk Krai: a new approach. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 34 (409), pp. 30-40..
  • Bobylev S.N., Zakharov V.M. Green economy and modernization. Eco-economic framework for sustainable development. Na puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu Rossii: byulleten’=Towards Sustainable Development in Russia, 2012, no. 60. 89 p..
  • Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. UNEP, 2011. Available at: http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/Decoupling_Report_English.pdf
  • Guevaraab Z., Domingos T. Three-level decoupling of energy use in Portugal 1995-2010. Energy Policy, 2017, vol. 108, pp. 134-142. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.050
  • Nagvi A., Zwickl K. Fifty shades of green: Revisiting decoupling by economic sector and air pollutants. Ecological Economics, 2017, vol. 133, pp. 111-126. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.017
  • Akulov A.O. Decoupling effect in the industrial region (the case of the Kemerovo Oblast). Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2013, no. 4 (28, pp. 177-185..
  • Kirillov S.N., Pakina A.A., Tul’skaya N.I. Evaluation of development sustainability at the regional level: the case of Tatarstan Republic. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya=Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System, 2017, no. 4 (41), pp. 127-137. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.4.14
  • Shkiperova G.T. Analysis and modeling of relationship between economic growth and environmental quality (the case of the Republic of Karelia). Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika=Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2014, no. 43 (394), pp. 41-49..
  • Yashalova N.N. Analysis of the decoupling effect in ecological and economic activity of a region. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2014, no. 39, pp. 54-61..
  • Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. Environmental component of economic development: transboundary regions of the Russian Federation and China. EKO=ECO Journal, 2014, no. 6 (480), pp. 5-24..
  • Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A. The prospects of green growth in Eastern Russia and the new Silk Road. EKO=ECO Journal, 2016, no. 7 (505), pp. 5-20..
  • De Haan M. Accounting for goods and bads. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands, 2004. 216 p.
  • Li X, Chalvatzis K.J., Pappas D. China’s electricity emission intensity in 2020 -an analysis at provincial level. Energy Procedia, 2017, vol. 142, pp. 2779-2785. doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.421
  • Glazyrina I.P., I.M. Potravnyi (Eds.). Mazneva M.A. Eco-intensity. In: Ekologicheskie indikatory kachestva rosta regional’noi ekonomiki . Moscow: NIA-Priroda, 2006. Chapter 5, pp. 126-147.
  • Glazyrina I.P, Zabelina I.A. Spatial heterogeneity of Russia in the light of the concept of a green economy: the social context. Geography and Natural Resources, 2018, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 14-22. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372818020026
  • Gulbrandsen T.Kh., Padalko L.P., Chervinskii V.L. Energoeffektivnost’ i energeticheskii menedzhment . Minsk: BGATU, 2010. 240 p.
  • Antonova N.E., Lomakina N.V. Natural resource-based industries of the Far East: new drivers of development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43-56. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2018.1.55.3
  • Ryumina E.V., Anikina A.M. Analysis of the impact of the natural resource factor on the level of economic development in Russian regions. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Forecasting Issues, 2007, no. 5, pp. 106-125..
  • Bobylev S.N. et al. Energoeffektivnost’ i ustoichivoe razvitie . Moscow: Institut ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2010. 148 p.
Еще
Статья научная