Demographic education in modern Russia: mismatch between the needs and opportunities
Автор: Rostovskaya Tamara K., Shabunova Aleksandra A., Davletshina Leysan A.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Public administration
Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Negative trends in major demographic processes, aggravated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, require not only an active demographic policy, but also thoughtful and well-grounded management decisions. This raises the requirements for the qualifications of employees in the field of science, education and management personnel in terms of their understanding of complex and multifactor demographic processes. Consequently, the need for training and retraining of demographers is also increasing. The purpose of the work is to assess the current state of demographic education in Russia and the possibilities of its development. The article presents an overview of foreign and national educational and scientific practice in the field of demographic education. We find that the “Demography” field is included in the enlarged group “3. Social sciences, business and law”; therefore, most educational institutions implement educational programs in the “Sociology” field; more often these are master’s degree programs. Scientific institutions focus on collaborating with educational institutions and pursue an educational and scientific trajectory (for example, the USA); they can also work autonomously by responding to the needs of the state and society (France, Germany). We also review Russian practice of implementing the educational process under the program “Demography”. We find out that only three universities conduct educational activities under this program. However, the scientific and educational potential for training demographers, taking into account “non-core” universities and academic research organizations, is available in the capital and in the regions. Nevertheless, the presence of laboratories specializing in demographic research proves the relevance of demographic knowledge in various regions of Russia. The analysis of departments’ teaching staff confirms their high educational and scientific potential. An overview of the work of scientific institutions and departments at universities indicates that vigorous scientific and research activity in the “Demography” field is being conducted in Russia. The analysis shows that in modern Russia, the issues of standardization of this area of work and education have not yet been fully worked out. We substantiate a system of successive stages for development of an educational standard in the “Demography” field and approval of the “Demographer” professional standard.
Demographer, labor market, education, system approach, professional standard, educational standard, multilevel education system, domestic experience, foreign experience
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238042
IDR: 147238042 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.4
Текст научной статьи Demographic education in modern Russia: mismatch between the needs and opportunities
It is impossible to imagine the existence of any state without the population living on its territory. The current geopolitical and socio-economic situation, geographical features and environmental parameters, wars and revolutions, as well as cultural, religious conditions and circumstances – all this determines the demographic situation.
Knowing the patterns of changes in the number and structure of the population and understanding demographic situation parameters are essential conditions for strategic planning and ensuring national security.
In Russia, considerable attention is paid to the issues of preservation of the people at the level of federal legislation. Presidential Decree 606 “On measures to implement the demographic policy of the Russian Federation”, dated May 17, 2012, which defines the main priorities and directions of the country’s demographic policy for the medium term may be named as one of the main documents in this area in the history of the new Russia1. The decree outlines very ambitious targets, including “increasing the total fertility rate to 1.753 by 2018” and “raising life expectancy in the Russian Federation to 74 years by 2018”. Taking into account the demographic situation that had developed in Russia by the beginning of the 21st century, it was impossible to ensure the full achievement of the listed targets and to maintain the result.
The decree on Russia’s national development goals up to 2030 signed by the RF President on July 21, 2020 contains the national goal of “preserving the population; people’s health and well-being”. Its targets are very ambitious, for example: “... raising life expectancy to 78 years; bringing down poverty rate twofold compared to 2017; raising the proportion of citizens systematically engaged in physical culture and sports to 70%”2. One of the main goals in this document is designated as “ensuring sustainable population growth in the Russian Federation”, including natural and migration movement parameters.
Presidential Decree 400, dated July 2, 2021 “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation” contains the section “Preservation of the people of Russia and development of human potential”. The document refers to the state policy in the field of preservation of the people of Russia through “sustainable natural population growth and improvement of the quality of life”. Among the tasks that make it possible to achieve the goal, the following are presented: “increasing the birth rate, forming motivation for having many children; increasing life expectancy, reducing population mortality and the level of disability, prevention of occupational diseases”3.
In two strategic documents devoted to the development and preservation of Russia, adopted a year apart, close attention is paid to the issues of preservation of the people. At the same time, there is a certain discrepancy: the national development goals are about sustainable population growth, and the National Security Strategy is about sustainable natural population growth. It seems that the former is more likely to be achieved in the near future, while the latter, which involves increasing the birth rate and reducing mortality, requires a lot of effort and time.
Demographic development indicators as indicators of government performance are also included in many documents: Federal Law 172-FZ, dated June 28, 2014 “On strategic planning in the Russian Federation”4, the forecast of socioeconomic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2036, prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia in 20185, the forecast of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for 2022 and for the planning period of 2023 and 2024, prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia in 20216, Order 191n of the Ministry of Labor, dated March 31, 2021
“On approving a methodology for determining the demand of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, economic sectors and major employers for skilled personnel for the medium and long term”7.
National projects aimed at the preservation of the people deserve special attention. Since 2007, they have been the key instruments of demographic policy, defining its goals, resources and methods.
A brief overview of strategic documents at the national level allows us to draw three important conclusions: first, at the national level, the preservation of the population is recognized as the major national security factor; second, Russia pays due attention to the formation of legislative frameworks in the field of demographic policy, but the targets of strategic documents are not always coordinated. Third, when forming demographic policy and adopting strategic documents for development of the country, it is extremely important to take into account the specifics and patterns of demographic development, to know and understand the needs of territories in order to achieve a demographic optimum and form a favorable demographic situation (an increase in the birth rate, a decrease in mortality, attracting workforce, etc.). This knowledge makes it possible to build an adequate and viable strategy, include viable and relevant parameters in it and obtain results, including those aimed at preserving the people.
However, a natural question arises: where does our country train specialists who are able to build a competent demographic strategy, analyze current demographic parameters, understand the essence of the personnel needs of regional labor markets and the degree of differentiation of territories along the course of demographic processes, and who know how to build predictive models and are able to interpret them? Are there enough such specialists in Russia?
Our article is devoted to the problem of training demographers in a difficult demographic situation. The main purpose of the work is to assess the state of demographic education in Russia and the possibilities of its development. To achieve the goal, we will analyze educational and scientific activity in the world and Russia within the “Demography” field, assess the personnel potential, outline the stages of development and implementation of the educational standard in the “Demography” field initiated by the expected approval of the professional standard “Demographer”.
Список литературы Demographic education in modern Russia: mismatch between the needs and opportunities
- Alshubiri F.N. (2021). Analysis of financial sustainability indicators of higher education institutions on foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence in OECD countries. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(1), 77–99. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-10-2019-0306
- Ashour S. (2021). How COVID-19 is reshaping the role and modes of higher education whilst moving towards a knowledge society: The case of the UAE. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2021.1930526
- Beal Krause A.L. (2021). The aged population and social spending in Latin America: Comparing the demographic functionalist theories and political pressure arguments. Politics and Policy, 49(5), 1061–1091. DOI: 10.1111/polp.12429
- Brauer S. (2021). Towards competence-oriented higher education: A systematic literature review of the different perspectives on successful exit profiles. Education and Training, 63(9), 1376–1390. DOI: 10.1108/ET-07-2020-0216
- Buitrago R., Salinas J., Boude O. (2021). Designing and representing learning itineraries: A systematic review of the literature. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 47, 94–122.
- Egorychev A.M., Rostov T.K. (2021). Prospects for the development of professional education in a globalization world community. CITISE, 1, 55–64. Available at: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2021.1.05 (in Russian).
- Fletcher J., Gillum D., Moritz R., Schwartz A. (2021). Demographic and salary trends of the 2020 biosafety workforce. Applied Biosafety, 26(3), 164–174. DOI: 10.1089/apb.20.0066
- Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. (2016). The Russian precariat: Human capital accumulation of different age groups. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 18, 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/DOI : 10.19181/vis.2016.18.3.412 (in Russian).
- Golenkova Z.T., Kosharnaya G.B., Kosharny V.P. (2018). Influence of education on improved competitiveness of employees in the labor market. Integratsiya obrazovaniya=Integration of Education, 22(2), 262–273. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.262.-273 (in Russian).
- Il’yasov B.G., Gerasimova I.B., Makarova E.A. et al. (2017). Osnovy teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza [Fundamentals of Systems Theory and Systems Analysis]. RICK UGATU.
- Karamzina A.G., Sil’nova S.V. (2021). System analysis and modelling of the development of further professional education programs. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Sistemnyi analiz i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Systems Analysis and Information Technologies, 2, 94–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17308/sait.2021.2/3507 (in Russian).
- Kicherova M.N., Semenov M.Yu., Zyuban E.V. (2021). Qualification assessment practices: New possibilities and constraints. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 23(7), 71–98. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-7-71-98
- Konstantinovsy D.L., Popova E.S. (2016). The intention of young people to higher education as an important resource of innovative development of Russia. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost', 1, 5–19. Available at: https://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2018/11/18/1251870868/5_19_Konstantinovsky
- Marszowski R., Drobek L., Hetmańczyk P., Markowska M. (2020). Education in the times of demographic change and globalization. Case study on the example of the Silesian Voivodeship. Sustainability, 12(14). DOI: 10.3390/su12145688
- Mikeshina L.A. (2005). Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of Science]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
- Rajović G., Bulatović J. (2017). Geography education research in Serbia: A teacher's perspective. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(1), 100–125. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2017.1.100
- Ramos M.E., Garza-Rodríguez J., Gibaja -Romero D.E. (2021). Automation of employment in the presence of industry 4.0: The case of Mexico. Technology in Society, 68(1), 101837. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101837
- Romanova G., Maznichenko M., Neskoromnyh N. (2016). Systematic approach to the goalsetting of higher education in the field of tourism and hospitality. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 17(3), 344–356. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2016.17.344
- Rostovskaya T.K., Zolotareva O.A. (2021). Professional standard “Demograph” as a factor of formation of a new human resources model. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 2(9), 82–95. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8106
- Serrano-Aguilera J.J., Tocino A., Fortes S. et al. (2021). Using peer review for student performance enhancement: Experiences in a multidisciplinary higher education setting. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1–21. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11020071
- Syupova M.S. (2018). Population policy: The experience of foreign countries Uchenye zametki TOGU: elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie, 9(1), 272–278 (in Russian).
- Tran L.T., Le Thanh Phan H., Marginson S. (2018). The ‘advanced programmes’ in Vietnam: Internationalising the curriculum or importing the ‘best curriculum’ of the west? Higher Education Dynamics, 51, 55–75. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78492-2_4.
- Wang T.-C., Phan B.N., Nguyen T.T.T. (2021). Evaluating operation performance in higher education: The case of Vietnam public universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7), 4082. DOI: 10.3390/su13074082
- Weber J.M., Lindenmeyer C.P., Liò P., Lapkin A.A. (2021). Teaching sustainability as complex systems approach: a sustainable development goals workshop. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(8), 25–41. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-06-2020-0209
- Yarnykh E.A., Davletshina L.A., Agentova G.V. (2021). Development prospects of education system in Russia. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova=Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 3, 44–55. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2021-3-44-55 (in Russian).
- Zabeli N., Kaçaniku F. (2021). Policy analysis for mapping the discourse of inclusion in higher education system in Kosovo. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 19(2), 452–483.