Developing a conceptual model of classifying phraseological units: classification practices and theoretical framework

Автор: Alimardonova F.P.

Журнал: Экономика и социум @ekonomika-socium

Рубрика: Основной раздел

Статья в выпуске: 5-1 (84), 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This paper analyzes existing literature of lexical bundle classification practices and proposes a conceptual model of lexical phrase typology based on the findings. First, the study focuses on the literature review about multi-word unit classification, considering different aspects of lexical unit structure and their functions in texts. Second, the study attempts to devise a theoretical model which can be widely used to make lists of phrases no matter what field of specialization is encountered. We hope that this model enables educators and researchers from different fields to classify effectively different phrases in term of structure, function and content connection.

Еще

Classification, structure, function, practice, lexical bundle, framework, target discourse, criteria

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140260500

IDR: 140260500

Список литературы Developing a conceptual model of classifying phraseological units: classification practices and theoretical framework

  • Ken Hyland (2008). “as can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation” 27(1):4-21.
  • Olga Mudraya (2006). “Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model” pp.235-256.
  • Elena Cotos (2017). “Language for specific purposes and corpus-based pedagogy” pp1-23.
  • Philippa Otto (2020). “Choosing specialized vocabulary to teach with data-driven learning: An example from civil engineering” pp32-36.
  • Dougal Graham (2014). “The engineering Phrases List: Towards Teachable ESP Phrases”pp1-16.
  • Veronika Tomankova (2016). “Lexical Bundle in Legal texts corpora – Selection, classification and pedagogical implications” pp75 – 94.
  • Douglas Biber et.al (2002). “The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English” 34(4).
  • Ken Hyland (2012). “Bundles in Academic Discourse”pp. 150 - 169
  • Altenberg, B. (1993). Recurrent word combinations in spoken English. In Arcy, J. D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Nordic Association for English Studies Conference (pp. 17–27).
  • Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 275–311.
  • Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263–286.
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2003). Towards a taxonomy of lexical bundles in speech and writing. In Wilson, A., Rayson, P., & McEnery, T. (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71–92).
  • Cheng, W. (2007). Concgramming: A corpus-driven approach to learning the phraseology of discipline-specific texts. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning, 1, 22–35
Еще
Статья научная