Digital civic participation in the context of modern research

Автор: Smoleva Elena O., Popov Andrei V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The emergence and development of digital civic participation is an inevitable consequence of Internet penetration into various spheres of life. Despite the novelty of the phenomenon itself, the practices of online activism have become engrained in public life; and they have a significant impact on certain events, and sometimes even act as the main trigger of subsequent changes, which is especially typical of the political system. At the same time, there are many concerns related to the spread of digital civics, so that it is very difficult to talk about the long-term implications of such transformations. In this regard, the purpose of our research is to summarize the experience of studying digital civic participation and highlight the features of its manifestation in a modern world. The research methodology is based on the principles of making a systematic scientific review. During the analysis, we identify essential foundations and distinctive features of online activism compared to the traditional offline format, which are reflected in the forms of manifestation, methods of attracting and composition of the participants themselves, as well as the conditions necessary for collective action. The scope of digital civic participation is largely ensured by the ease of entry into public affairs, and the variability of activities and types of networking. Despite the prevalence of the thesis about the purely external visibility of online activism and its destructive consequences, specific empirical studies do not confirm this conclusion. Nevertheless, the threats of the spread of ICT are quite real and go far beyond the virtual space. In conclusion, we formulate several polemic provisions on possible ways to overcome the contradictions in this area. Our research contributes to the development of scientific ideas about the specifics of digital civic participation and the disclosure of the potential of its application from the standpoint of modern challenges and threats.


Digital civic participation, online activism, digital activism, social media, slacktivism, civic participation, digitalization

Короткий адрес:

IDR: 147238046   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.8

Список литературы Digital civic participation in the context of modern research

  • Akhremenko A.S., Stukal D.K., Petrov A.P. (2020). Network vs message in protest diffusion on social media: Theoretical and data analysis perspectives. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya=Polis. Political Studies, 2, 73–91. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06 (in Russian).
  • Al-Hasan A., Khalil O., Yim D. (2021). Digital information diversity and political engagement: The impact of website characteristics on browsing behavior and voting participation. Information Polity, 26(1), 21–37. DOI: 10.3233/IP-190183
  • Barua Z., Barua S., Aktar S., Kabir N., Li M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020, 8. Available at: DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119 (accessed: October 10, 2021).
  • Basheva O.A. (2020). Digital activism as a new method of civil mobilization. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie=Research Result. Sociology and Management, 6(1), 41–57. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-4 (in Russian).
  • Bennett L.W. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428
  • Bennett L.W., Segerberg A. (2015). The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
  • Boulianne S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. DOI: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  • Boulianne S., Theocharis Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318814190
  • Bovet A., Makse H.A. (2019). Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications, 10. Available at: DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2(accessed: October 10, 2021).
  • Boyd D. (2008). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 13–20.
  • Demakova K., Makovetskaya S., Skryakova E. (2014). Non-political activism in Russia. Pro et Contra, 3–4, 148–163 (in Russian).
  • Edgerly S., Vraga E.K., Bode L., Thorson K., Thorson E. (2018). New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 192–212. DOI: 10.1177/1077699017706928
  • Enikolopov R., Makarin A., Petrova M., Polishchuk L. (2020). Social image, networks, and protest participation. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at:
  • Ermolaeva P.O., Ermolaeva Yu.V., Basheva O.A. (2020). Digital environmental activism as the new from of environmental participation. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie=Russian Sociological Review, 19(3), 376–408. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-376-408(388) (in Russian).
  • Etzioni A., Etzioni O. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. The Information Society, 15(4), 241–248. DOI: 10.1080/019722499128402
  • Eubank N., Grossman G., Platas M.R., Rodden J. (2021) Viral voting: Social networks and political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 265–284. DOI:10.1561/100.00019092
  • Fergusson L., Molina C. (2021). Facebook Causes Protests. Lacea Working Paper Series No. 0041.l. 112 р.
  • Gerbaudo P. (2017). From cyper-autonomism to cyber-populism: an ideological history of digital activism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 477–489. DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773
  • Gunitsky S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspect. Polit., 13(1), 42–54.
  • Hjalmar B.C., Jonas T., Benedikte B. (2021). On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: The impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23(1), 122–140. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270
  • Howard P.N., Duffy A., Freelon D., Hussain M., Mari W., Mazaid M. (2011). What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring ? PITPI Work. Pap. 30 p.
  • Howard P.N., Savage S., Flores Saviaga C., Toxtli C., Monroy-Hernández A. (2016). Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico’s “El Bronco”. Journal of International Affairs, 70(1), 55–74.
  • Jost J.T., Barber P., Bonneau R., Langer M., Metzger M., Nagler J., Sterling J., Tucker J.A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85–118. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12478
  • Khondker H.H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675–679. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
  • Kristofferson K., White K., Peloza J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166. DOI: 10.1086/674137
  • Lane D.S., Dal Cin S. (2018). Sharing beyond slacktivism: The effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1523–1540. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340496
  • Lane D.S., Lee S.S., Liang F., Kim D.H., Shen L., Weeks B.E., Kwak N. (2019). Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–72. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy064
  • Lee Y.-H., Hsieh G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2470770
  • Lonkila M., Shpakovskaya L., Torchinsky P. (2021). Digital activism in Russia: The Evolution and forms of online participation in an authoritarian state. In: Gritsenko D., Wijermars M., Kopotev M. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_8
  • Makarova E.A., Makarova E.L., Makhrina E.A. (2016). Psychological features of cyberbullying as a form of internet crime. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal=Russian Psychological Journal, 13(3), 293–311. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2016.3.17(298-299) (in Russian).
  • Mandarano L., Meenar M., Steins C. (2010). Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement. Journal of Planning Literature, 25(2), 123–135. DOI: 10.1177/0885412210394102 (132)
  • Menteş S.A. (2019). Online environmental activism: The case of Iğneada floodplain forest. SAGE Open, 9, 1–10. DOI:10.1177/2158244019877877
  • Micheletti M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Milbrath L. (1965). Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Nikovskaya L.I. (2017). Civic activism and public policy in Russia: Status and challenges. In: Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoi srede. Vyp. I (Trudy XX Mezhdunarodnoi ob’’edinennoi nauchnoi konferentsii Internet i sovremennoe obshchestvo, IMS-2017, Sankt-Peterburg, 21–23 iyunya 2017 g. Sbornik nauchnykh statei) [State and Citizens in the Electronic Environment. Issue 1 (Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Scientific Conference Internet and Modern Society, IMS-2017, Saint Petersburg, June 21–23, 2017: Collection of Scientific Articles)]. Saint Petersburg: Universitet ITMO (in Russian).
  • Norris P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press. 303 р.
  • Pettingill L. (2008). Engagement 2.0? How the new digital media can invigorate civic engagement. Gnovis Journal, 8(3), 155–161.
  • Putnam R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rottinghaus B., Escher T. (2020). Mechanisms for inclusion and exclusion through digital political participation: Evidence from a comparative study of online consultations in three German cities. Z Politikwiss, 30, 261–298. DOI: 10.1007/s41358-020-00222-7
  • Seddighi H., Salmani I. (2018) Online volunteering, a way to reduce health inequalities: A review study. Journal of Community Health Research, 7(4), 256–264.
  • Silva F., Proença T., Ferreira M.R. (2018). Volunteers’ perspective on online volunteering – a qualitative approach. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15, 531–552. Available at:
  • Skalaban I.A. (2011a). Public participation: Theoretical and methodological problems of interpretation. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem=Modern Studies of Social Studies, 6(2), 216–220 (in Russian).
  • Skalaban I.A. (2011b). Social, public and civic participation: On the problem of understanding concepts. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya”=Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Series “Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science”, 1(13), 131–139 (in Russian).
  • Smith B.G., Krishna A., Al-Sinan R. (2019). Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(3), 182–196. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1621870
  • Smoleva E.O. (2021). Internet practices of citizens’ participation in creating comfortable urban area (case study of the Northwestern federal district). Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 25(2), 90–107. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.2.112.6 (in Russian).
  • Teocharis Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media Society, 2(1), 5. DOI:10.1177/2056305115610140
  • Theocharis Y., de Moor J., van Deth J.W. (2021). Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 30–53. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.231
  • Tranfield D., Denyer D., Smart P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 4, 207–222.
  • Vegh S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In: McCaughey M., Ayers M. (Eds.). Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Weber L., Loumakis A., Bergman J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 26–42.
  • Wolfsfeld G., Segev E., Sheafer T. (2013). Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first. Int. J. Press., 18(2), 115–137.
  • Wu W., Weaver D. (1997). On-line democracy or on-line demagoguery? Public opinion “polls” on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2(4), 71–86.
  • Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B.D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
  • Yang K.C., Kang Y. (2017). Social media, political mobilization, and citizen engagement: A case study of the March 18, 2014, Sunflower Student Movement. In: Adria M., Mao Y. (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media. IGI Global. Available at: http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1081-9.ch020
  • Yessenbekova U.M. (2020). Social media and slacktivism in young people’s life. Media Watch, 11(3), 515–525.
Статья научная