Controversies in minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer

Background. Determination of the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer and identification of criteria for optimal surgical access that ensures safety, effectiveness, and satisfactory immediate and long-term results remain challenging in gynecological oncology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes in patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy via laparotomy compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Material and Methods. Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with invasive breast cancer were analyzed. The assessment of the objective tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the RECIST scale (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) was confirmed by clinical, ultrasound and CT/ MRI findings. The Kaplan-Maier curves and the log-rank criterion were used to compare the time of relapse-free and overall survivals. Statistical analysis and visualization of the analysis results were performed using Prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad, USA).