Дистанционное сопровождение пациентов с вертебральной патологией

Бесплатный доступ

Обоснование: Применение дистанционных технологий является требованием сегодняшнего времени в связи с потребностью в преемственности и непрерывности мероприятий по медицинской реабилитации, наличием труднодоступных удалённых регионов в нашей стране и быстроразвивающимися реабилитационными технологиями.

Телемедицина, амбулаторная, дистанционная реабилитация, вертебральная патология

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140303485

IDR: 140303485   |   DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_18_4_129

Список литературы Дистанционное сопровождение пациентов с вертебральной патологией

  • Дистанционно-контролируемая реабилитация (комплексная медицинская реабилитация с применением телемедицинской технологии) для пациентов со спастическим гемипарезом после перенесенного острого нарушения мозгового кровообращения (ОНМК) или черепно-мозговой травмы (ЧМТ) Клинические рекомендации. 2019: 66. [Distantsionno-kontroliruemaya reabilitatsiya (kompleksnaya meditsinskaya reabilitatsiya s primeneniem telemeditsinskoi tekhnologii) dlya patsientov so spasticheskim gemiparezom posle perenesennogo ostrogo narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya (ONMK) ilicherepno-mozgovoitravmy (ChMT) Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. 2019: 66. (In Russ.)]
  • Снопков П.С., Лядов К.В., Шаповаленко Т.В., и др. Дистанционная реабилитация: истоки, состояние, перспективы. Физиотерапия, бальнеология и реабилитация. 2016; 15(3): 141-145. [Snopkov PS, Lyadov KV, Shapovalenko TV, et al. Distantsionnaya reabilitatsiya: istoki, sostoyanie, perspektivy. Fizioterapiya, bal’neologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2016; 15(3): 141-145. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.18821/16813456-2016-15-3-141-145.
  • Борисов И.В., Бондарь В.А., Канарский М.М., и др. Дистанционная реабилитация: роль и возможности // Физическая и реабилитационная медицина, медицинская реабилитация. — 2021. — Т.3. — №4. — C.399-408. [Borisov IV, Bondar’ VA, KanarskiiMM, et al. Distantsionnay areabilitatsiya: rol’ i vozmozhnosti // Fizicheskaya i reabilitatsionnaya meditsina, meditsinskaya reabilitatsiya. — 2021. — T.3. — №4. — C.399-408. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.36425/rehab80253.
  • Park KH, Song MR. Comparative analysis of pain, muscle strength, disability, and quality of life in middle-aged and older adults after web video lower back exercise. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021; 40(3): 170-177. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000801.
  • Costa F, Janela D, Molinos M, et al. Digital rehabilitation for acute low back pain: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Pain Research. 2022; 15: 1873-1887. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S369926.
  • Sandal LF, Bach K, Overas CK, et al. Effectiveness of app-delivered, tailored self-management support for adults with lower back pain-related disability: a selfback randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181(10): 1288-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097.
  • Mbada CE, Olaoye MI, Dada OO, et al. Comparative efficacy of clinic-based and telerehabilitation application of Mckenzie therapy in chronic low-back pain. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2019; 11(1): 41-58. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2019.6260.
  • Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP, et al. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2017; 31(5): 625-638. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148.
  • Glauser G, Ali ZS, Gardiner D, et al. Assessing the utility of an IoS application in the perioperative care of spine surgery patients: theNeuroPath pilot study. Mobile Health. 2019; 5: 40. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.09.01.
  • Hou J, Yang R, Yang Y, et al. The effectiveness and safety of utilizing mobile phone-based programs for rehabilitation after lumbar spinal surgery: multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth. 2019; 7(2): e10201. doi: 10.2196/10201.
  • Glauser G, Ali ZS, Gardiner D, et al. Assessing the utility of an IoS application in the perioperative care of spine surgery patients: theNeuroPath Pilot study. Mobile Health. 2019; 5: 40. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.09.01.
  • Dadarkhah A, Rezaimoghadam F, Najafi S, et al. Remote versus in-person exercise instruction for chronic nonspecific low back pain lasting 12 weeks or longer: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2021; 113(3): 278-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.016.
  • Raiszadeh K, Tapicer J, Taitano L, et al. In-clinic versus web-based multidisciplinary exercise-based rehabilitation for treatment of low back pain: prospective clinical trial in an integrated practice unit model. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021; 23(3): e22548. doi: 10.2196/22548.
  • Herbert MS, Afari N, Liu L, et al. Telehealth versus in-person acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a randomized noninferiority trial. The Journal of Pain. 2017, 18: 200-211. doi: 10.1016/j. jpain.2016.10.014.
  • Itoh N, Mishima H, Yoshida Y, et al. Evaluation of the effect of patient education and strengthening exercise therapy using a mobile messaging app on work productivity in Japanese patients with chronic low back pain: open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth. 2022; 10(5): e35867. doi: 10.2196/35867.
  • Toelle TR, Utpadel-Fischler DA, Haas KK, et al. App-based multidisciplinary back pain treatment versus combined physiotherapy plus online education: a randomized controlled trial. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2019; 2: 34. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0109-x.
  • Fiani B, Siddiqi I, Lee SC, et al. Telerehabilitation: development, application, and need for increased usage in the COVID-19 era for patients with spinal pathology. Cureus. 2020; 12(9): e10563. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10563.
  • Min Y, Xu P. Curative effects of remote home management combined with Feng’s spinal manipulation on the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar disc herniation. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022; 2022: 1420392. doi: 10.1155/2022/1420392.
  • Nizeyimana E, Joseph C, Plastow N, et al. A scoping review of feasibility, cost, access to rehabilitation services and implementation of telerehabilitation: implications for low- and middle-income countries. Digital Health. 2022; 8: 20552076221131670. doi: 10.1177/20552076221131670.
  • Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, et al. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2015; 52(3): 361-70. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239.
  • Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Fatoye C, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth. 2020; 8(6): e15375. doi: 10.2196/15375.
  • Lewkowicz D, Wohlbrandt A, Bottinger E. Digital therapeutic care apps with decision-support interventions for people with low back painin Germany: cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth. 2022; 10(2): e35042. doi: 10.2196/35042.
  • Tenforde AS, Hefner JE, Kodish-Wachs JE, et al. Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a narrative review. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017; 9(5S): S51-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.013.
  • Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, et al. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2015; 21(4): 202-13. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15572201.
  • Del Pino R, Díez-Cirarda M, Ustarroz-Aguirre I, Gonzalez-Larragan S, Caprino M, Busnatu S, Gand K, Schlieter H, Gabilondo I, Gómez-Esteban JC. Costs and effects of telerehabilitation in neurological and cardiological diseases: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 832229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.832229.
  • Вершинин Г.С., Винярская И.В., Терлецкая Р.Н. и др. Оценка доступности и качества телемедицинских консультаций при оказании медицинской помощи детям (по результатам анкетирования врачей) // Вестник Ивановской медицинской академии. — 2021. — Т.26. — №3. — С.20. [Vershinin GS, Vinyarskaya IV, Terkeckaya RN, et al. Ocenka dopustimisti I kachectva telemedicinskih konsultacij pri okazanii medicinskoj pomoshi detyam (po rezultatam anketirovaniya vrachej). Vestnik Ivanovskoj Medicinskoj academii. 2021; 26(3): 20. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.52246/ 1606-8157_2021_26_3_18.
  • Shafi K, Lovecchio F, Forston K, et al. The Efficacy of Telehealth for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders: Patient-Reported Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020; 16: 17-23. doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09808-x.
Еще
Статья научная