Efficiency of state policy in the field of science and technology in the Russian Federation: assessment methodology and approbation results

Efficiency of state policy in the field of science and technology in the Russian Federation: assessment methodology and approbation results

Автор: Vasilyeva I.N., Rozova O.I., Korneeva N.D., Bogatova R.S.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents a methodology for evaluating the efficiency of measures and tools of state policy in the field of science and technology. The approach was developed and tested in order to improve the mechanism for monitoring the achievement of strategic goals of Russia’s scientific and technological development discussed at the meeting of the Presidential Council for Science and Education on February 8, 2023. The implementation of this direction is of great importance for ensuring technological sovereignty of the country. In the course of the research we used general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis and generalization, observation, comparison, measurement, grouping. Statistical methods such as correspondence analysis and cluster analysis were also used to implement the main task. The assessment was carried out in three directions: effectiveness assessment, assessment of the growth rate of targets, and assessment of the relevance of measures and tools of state policy in the field of science and technology by the scientific community. Based on these criteria, a set of data and a conclusion on the efficiency of public policy tools and measures were formed. The results obtained indicate the average efficiency of the tools and measures of state policy in terms of their effectiveness and relevance. The growth rates of most indicators are characterized by negative dynamics. This is primarily due to the fact that during the second stage of the implementation of the scientific and technological development strategy, restrictions caused by coronavirus infection were introduced, and we should also point out an increase in sanctions pressure.

Еще

Efficiency assessment, state policy in the field of science and technology, state policy measures, target indicators, effectiveness, scientific and technological development

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147242464

IDR: 147242464   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.9

Список литературы Efficiency of state policy in the field of science and technology in the Russian Federation: assessment methodology and approbation results

  • Bach L. et al. (1995). Evaluation of the economic effects of Brite-Euram programmes on the European industry. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018003
  • Barré R. (2001). Policy-making processes and evaluation tools: S&T indicators. In: Science and Technology Policy. Vol. II. Policy-Making Processes and Evaluation Tools: S&T Indicators. Available at: http://eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C15/E1-30-04-01.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Bloch C. (2007). Assessing recent developments in innovation measurement: The third edition of the Oslo Manual. Science and Public Policy, 34(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X190487
  • Breusova A.G. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”, 2, 128–136 (in Russian).
  • Caetano I. (2017). Innovation, Evaluation and Measurement: Macro-Level and Firm-Level Perspectives. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9_7
  • Dmitrenko M.A. (2018). Features of scientific and technical policy in Russia. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski=State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, 2, 227–231. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2018-1-2-227-231 (in Russian).
  • Gokhberg L.M., Gershman M.A., Lapochkina V.V. et al. (2023). Delaem nauku v Rossii: reiting mer nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki [Doing Science in Russia: Rating of Science and Technology Policy Measures]. NIU VSHE. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/news/page2.html (accessed: September 13, 2023).
  • Kuhlmann S. (1996). Evaluation as a Medium of Science & Technology Policy: Recent Developments in Germany and Beyond. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/1823592.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Kuhlmann S. (2003). Evaluation of research and innovation policies: A discussion of trends with examples from Germany. Journal of Technology Management, 26(2-4), 131–49. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefan-Kuhlmann/publication/46671429_Evaluation_of_research_and_innovation_policies_A_discussion_of_trends_with_examples_from_Germany/links/0c96051ed410f21139000000/Evaluation-of-research-and-innovation-policies-A-discussion-of-trends-with-examples-from-Germany.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Lepori B., Reale E. (2012). S&T indicators as a tool for formative evaluation of research programs. Evaluation, 18(4), 451–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460961
  • Luo L.P. (2012). A review of the Chinese National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE: 3), 197–199. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/111/126 (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Luukkonen T. (1997). The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programs. Research Policy, 27(6), 599–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00058-4
  • Malinetskii G.G. (2021). Science and development strategy of Russia. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie=Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 3, 26–44. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2021.3.2. EDN XFIPED (in Russian).
  • Onishchenko G.G., Kablov E.N., Ivanov V.V. (2022). Scientific and technological development of Russia in the context of achieving national goals: Problems and solutions. Innovatsii=Innovations, 6(260), 3–16. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.260.6.001 (in Russian).
  • Rykova I.N. (2013). Approaches to determining the performance of research and development activities in Russia. Finansovyi zhurnal=Financial Journal, 3(17), 73–88 (in Russian).
  • Sanz Menéndez L. at al. (1997). Science and Technology Policy Evaluation in the Context of Advanced S&T Policy Planning. Available at: https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/2038/1/science_technology.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Sanz Menéndez L. at al. (2005). Explaining the science and technology policies of regional governments. In: Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC), 10-2005. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/1644 (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  • Tanaka K., Sakata I. (2017). New Science and Technology Policy Evaluation Using Bibliometric Approach. DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125259
  • Tulyakova I.V. (2017). Assessing the efficiency of government programs: problems and prospects. Finkontrol’, 4. Available at: https://rufincontrol.ru/online/article/332551/(accessed: September 14, 2023; in Russian).
  • Vasilyeva I.N., Kris’ko M.O., Korneeva N.D. et al. (2022). The relevance of the tools and mechanisms created during the implementation of the action plan of the strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian federation and the impact of the proposed measures on the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii=Sociology of Science and Tchnology, 13(3), 118–142. DOI: 10.24412/2079-0910-2022-3-118-142 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©