Elaborating a methodology for assessing the impact of innovation entrepreneurship on the development of the region’s economy

Elaborating a methodology for assessing the impact of innovation entrepreneurship on the development of the region’s economy

Автор: Ivanov Semen L., Metlyakhin Aleksandr I.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Science, technology and innovation studies

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Along with the transition of the Russian economy to innovation development, the role of innovation entrepreneurship as a driver of intensive economic growth has significantly increased. This type of entrepreneurship provides regions with competitive advantages. The purpose of the study is to assess the extent of influence of innovation entrepreneurship on the level of economic development of Russian regions by testing the technique of regression analysis of panel data. In order to achieve this goal, we addressed the following tasks: first, we reviewed scientific papers that investigate the influence of the innovation factor (including innovation entrepreneurship) on the development of the regional economy; second, we selected and scientifically substantiated the choice of statistical indicators that reflect, on the one hand, the development of innovation entrepreneurship and on the other - the development of the economy of Russian regions; third, we analyzed the impact of innovation entrepreneurship on the economic development of Russian regions on the basis of the indicators selected and with the use of econometric tools. We applied the following scientific methods: systematization, generalization, study of literature, documents, and results of activities. We should separately highlight the method of mathematical modeling that we used to perform a regression analysis. The following results were obtained: first, on the basis of the review, we found that innovation entrepreneurship has a significant impact on the development of the economy of regions, especially during recession periods; second, the results of the regression analysis allowed us to confirm the hypothesis that innovation entrepreneurship should be considered a significant factor in economic development of Russian regions. We also revealed that in the conditions of the modern domestic economy, the technological component of innovation entrepreneurship (the essence of which is the development of innovative solutions) is the most prominent one.

Еще

Innovation entrepreneurship, region, gross regional product, indicator, innovative solution, innovation product, regression analysis, modeling, panel data

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238474

IDR: 147238474   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.9

Список литературы Elaborating a methodology for assessing the impact of innovation entrepreneurship on the development of the region’s economy

  • Abalkin L.I. (2004). Strategicheskii otvet Rossii na vyzovy novogo veka [Russia’s Strategic Response to the Challenges of the New Century]. Moscow: Ekzamen.
  • Abdulvagapova A.A. (2021). Development of the system of state support for small innovation entrepreneurship in the region. Voprosy regional'noi ekonomiki, 2(47), 3–10 (in Russian).
  • Aganbegyan A.G., Klepach A.N., Porfir'ev B.N., Uzyakov M.N., Shirov A.A. (2020). Post-pandemic recovery of the Russian economy and transition to sustainable socio-economic development. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 6, 18–26. DOI: doi.org/10.47711/0868–6351–183–18–26 (in Russian).
  • Bauman S.N. (2005). Small innovation enterprises of Russia: An inside look (results of a questionnaire study of small innovation enterprises of the Russian Federation). In: Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [Scientific Articles – Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 3. Pp. 170–175 (in Russian).
  • Bessy Ch., Favereau O. (2010). Economics of conventions and institutionalism: The outcomes of interaction. Voprosy ekonomiki, 9, 26–40 (in Russian).
  • Burkina T.A. (2020). Scientific and industrial cooperation in innovation sphere. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki=The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 12(6), 1–9 (in Russian).
  • Caballero G., Soto-Oñate D. (2015). Citation: The diversity and rapprochement of theories of institutional change: original institutionalism and new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, XLIX, 4, 947–977. DOI 10.1080/00213624.2015.1105021
  • Chelnokova O.Yu., Sumarokova E.S. (2014). The influence of the university of small innovative enterprises on regional development. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo=Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law, 14(2-2), 368–373 (in Russian).
  • Cwik P.F. (2011). Citation: The new neo mercantilism: Currency manipulation as a form of protectionism. Economic Affairs, 31(3), 7–11.
  • Dequech D. (2012). Citation: Post Keynesianism, heterodoxy and mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 24(2), 353–368.
  • Fat'yanov A.A. (2018). GRP as an indicator of the state of the economy of the region. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie, 7(1)(22), 254–256 (in Russian).
  • Fenin K.V. (2017). New interpretation of the classical interregional and international trade theories: Economic logic vs the economy. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo=Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law, 17(2), 148–156 (in Russian).
  • Gadzhiev Yu.A. (2017). Early theories of economic growth: from mercantilism to the classical school. Sciences of Europe, 16–2(16), 16–23 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2008). Will the transition of the Russian economy to an innovative path of development take place? Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 1-2, 3–11 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2011). Alternative government policy of modernization and national economy development (suggestions of scientists from economics section of RAS social sciences branch). Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 4, 68–85 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2013a). On the unevenness of modern economic growth as a process of development and change of technological patterns. Sotsiologiya, 4, 42–52 (in Russian).
  • Glazyev S.Yu. (2013b). The policy of outrunning development under the change of technological order. Vestnik RAEN=Bulletin of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences,13(1), 29–35 (in Russian).
  • Golova I.M. (2021). Ecosystem approach to innovation management in russian regions. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 17(4), 1346–1360 (in Russian).
  • Gretchenko A.A., Manakhov S.V. (2011). Innovation in Russia: History, modern time and prospects. Kreativnaya ekonomika=Creative Economy, 3, 76–83 (in Russian).
  • Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1989). Citation: Product development and international trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1261–1283.
  • Gutman G.V. (2002). Upravlenie regional'noi ekonomikoi [Managing Regional Economy]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika.
  • Hospers G.-J. (2005). Citation: Joseph Schumpeter and his legacy in innovation studies. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 18(3), 20–37.
  • Ivanov S.L. (2021). Analysis of the essence and state of innovative entrepreneurship in the conditions of the modern Russian economy. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta=Actual Problems of Economics and Management, 4(32), 77–91 (in Russian).
  • Kovaleva I.P. (2015). Models of economic growth: Theory and practice of Keynesianism. Aktual'nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk, 45, 6–14 (in Russian).
  • Kupriyanov A.N., Kholodova P.K., Ostrikova O.I. (2020). Development of the innovative entrepreneurship sector in the conditions of economic recession. In: Upravlenie v usloviyakh ekonomicheskogo krizisa: strategiya protivodeistviya ugrozam i perspektivy ustoichivogo razvitiya. Materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Management in the Context of the Economic Crisis: Strategy of Countering Threats and the Prospects for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the 16th International Research-to-Practice Conference] (In Russian).
  • Kurz H.D. (2007). Innovation and profit. Schumpeter and the heritage of the classics. Finansy i biznes, 2, 26–47 (in Russian).
  • Kuznetsova E.P. (2019). Systematization of directions of government programs on stimulation of research and production cooperation in NWFD. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 4(21), 1–7. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.4.21.9 (in Russian).
  • Leksin V.N., Shvetsov A.N. (1997). Gosudarstvo i regiony. Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya territorial'nogo razvitiya [The State and the Regions. Theory and Practice of State Regulation of Territorial Development]. Moscow: URSS.
  • Leont'ev B. (2015). Systemic innovation economy. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost', 9, 4–14 (in Russian).
  • Lucas R.E. (1988). Citation: On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.
  • Nelson R.R., Romer P.M. (1996). Citation: Science, economic growth, and public policy. Challenge, 39, 9–21.
  • Oliveira S.R.M. (2019). Relationship between technological eco-innovation capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from most innovative firms in the USA. In: Proceedings of the International Management Conference, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania. 13(1). November.
  • Oswald O.R.S. (2019). The new architects: Brazil, China, and innovation in multilateral development lending. Public Administration and Development, 39(4–5), 203–214.
  • Polunin L.V. (2012). The impact of innovative enterprises on the regional economy. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy=Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes, 7-8(41-42), 133–139 (in Russian).
  • Polyanskaya N.M., Naidanova E.B. (2015). Role of innovations in the economy of Russia and its regions. Naukovedenie, 7(4). Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/129EVN415.pdf. DOI: 10.15862/129EVN415 (in Russian).
  • Ramadani V., Hisrich R.D., Abazi-Alili H., Dana L., Panthi L. Abazi-Bexheti L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 271–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010
  • Rivera-Batiz L.A., Romer P.M. (1991). Citation: Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 531–555.
  • Romer P.M. (1990). Citation: Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.
  • Romer P.M. (1992). Citation: Two strategies for economic development: Using ideas and producing ideas. The World Bank Economic Review, 6, 63–91.
  • Ruban D.A. (2016). Regional innovation systems in Russia: A social and economic aspect. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 8(431), 114–129 (in Russian).
  • Rumyantsev A.A. (2018). Research and innovation activity in the region as a driver of its sustainable economic development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 11(2), 84–99. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.2.56.6 (in Russian).
  • Salamova A.S. (2020). The theoretical foundations of institutionalism. Application in modern economics. Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi ekonomiki=Topical Issues of the Modern Economy, 10, 323–329 (in Russian).
  • Schumacher R. (2012a). Citation: Adam Smith’s theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5, 54–80.
  • Schumacher R. (2012b). Citation: Deconstructing the theory of comparative advantage. World Economic Review, 2, 83–105.
  • Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., Fedyunina A.A., Zaitsev A.A., Yurevich M.A. (2021). Labor productivity in the non-resource sectors of the Russian economy: What determines firm-level growth? Voprosy ekonomiki, 3, 31–67 (in Russian).
  • Smotritskaya I.I., Chernykh S.I. (2021). Organizational innovations in the sphere of public administration. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki rossiiskoi akademii nauk=Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1, 9–25 (in Russian).
  • Toffler A. (1986). The future of labor. In: Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade [A New Technocratic Wave in the West]. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).
  • Uskova T.V. (2009). Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem regiona [Managing Sustainable Development in the Region]. Vologda: ISERT RAN.
  • Yakushev N.O. (2017). High-technology export of Russia and its territorial aspects. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 3(89), 62–77 (in Russian).
  • Zadumkin K.A., Terebova S.V. (2009). The Vologda Oblast: Prerequisites for innovation development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny v regione: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 1(45), 26–40 (in Russian).
  • Zhil'nikov A.Yu. (2014). Analysis of the impact of innovative activity of the region on GRP. Territoriya nauki, 6, 53–57 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp