Environmental threats as a factor promoting environmental consciousness

Автор: Velikaya Nataliya M., Novozhenina Olga P.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article examines changes in environmental consciousness, which depend on how environmental threats are presented and perceived in public opinion and public discourse in Russia. Using the theory of socio-cultural risks and threats, we consider the formation of the so-called environmental paradigm, which interprets environmental consciousness as part of public consciousness. Analyzing the inclusion of the environmental agenda in the domestic public and political discourse, we show show that since the 1990s Russian legislation has been guided by international documents in this area, and the Russian Federation has actively participated in all significant international environmental forums. The attack on the non-profit sector initiated by the state authorities in the 2010s significantly reduced the number of non-governmental organizations in the environmental sphere and affected the content of public discourse. The low level of awareness of the progress and content of the national project “Ecology” indicates insufficient interaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation with civil society institutions and representatives of local environmental initiatives. As a result, poor involvement of the population in environmental processes can potentially lead to the emergence of occasional environmental protests. The data of sociological studies show that public awareness of environmental threats is growing rather slowly and unevenly. In the overall rating of threats, environmental threats usually rank 3rd-4th, but this has a small effect on environmental behavior and on the formation of nature-saving social practices. We consider promoting environmental consciousness as a process of helping people to become more aware of anthropogenic risks and strive for a healthy ecological environment. The typological group of “responsible” individuals identified on the basis of this approach differs from the group of “indifferent” ones according to a number of socio-demographic and sociopolitical features and demonstrates weak positive dynamics.

Еще

Sustainable development, ecology, environmental consciousness, ecological crisis, national projects, social practices, ecological modernization

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238478

IDR: 147238478   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.13

Список литературы Environmental threats as a factor promoting environmental consciousness

  • Aksenova O.V. (2006). Social and environmental reflection in the West. Istoriya i sovremennost’=History and Modernity, 2, 162–187 (in Russian).
  • Ashkhamaf A.R. (2010). Ecological consciousness: To the problem of defining the concept. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gos. un-ta. Seriya 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya=Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series 1: Regional studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Law, Political Science, Cultural Studies, 3, 15–18 (in Russian).
  • Babkin V.O. (2014). Social ecology as a new emerging discipline and its relationship to human ecology. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta=Orenburg State Agrarian University, 3, 183–186 (in Russian).
  • Beck U. (2010). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Beck U., Kropp K. (2007). Environmental risks and public perceptions. In: Pretty J., Ball A.S., Benton T. et al. (Eds.). Sage Handbook on Environment and Society. Sage. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263656251_Environmental_Risks_and_Public_Perceptions
  • Berkut V.P. (2010). Ecophobic consciousness: History and modernity. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal=Military Historical Journal, 8. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekofobnoe-soznanie-istoriya-i-sovremennost (accessed: May 12, 2022; in Russian).
  • Bondarev V.P. (2010). The historical roots and theoretical basis of modern environmental sociology. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 2, 3–20 (in Russian).
  • Bookchin M. (1993). What is social ecology? In: Zimmerman M.E. et al. (Eds.). Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey): Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bookchin M. (1996). Rekonstruktsiya obshchestva. Na puti k zelenomu budushchemu [Reconstructing Society. Toward a Green Future]. Nizhny Novgorod: Tretii put’.
  • Catton W.R., Dunlap R.E. (1978). Environmental sociology and new paradigms. The American Sociologist, 13, 41–49.
  • Deryabo S.D. (1999). Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya: diagnostika ekologicheskogo soznaniya [Environmental Psychology: Diagnosis of Environmental Consciousness]. Moscow: Mosk. psikh.-sots. institut.
  • Dunlap R.E., Catton W.R. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25(1), 25–30.
  • Efremenko D.V. (2006). Ekologo-politicheskie diskursy: Vozniknovenie i evolyutsiya [Environmental-Political Discourses: Emergence and Evolution]. Moscow: INION
  • Gladun E.F. et al. (2021). Green governance: The concept of environment-oriented regional development. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 3, 31–52 (in Russian).
  • Gordin I.V., Ryumina E.V. (2021). Regional and environmental factors in the mental component of human potential. Regionologiya=Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 29, 1(114), 151–171. DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.114.029.202101.151-171 (in Russian).
  • Kefner N.V., Morgun A.V. (2020). Environmental non-profit organizations in the Russian Federation under conditions of adoption of the law “on foreign agents”: Consequences and methods of adaptation. In: Kefner N.V., Popova Yu.V. et al. (Eds.). Razvitie politicheskikh institutov i protsessov: zarubezhnyi i otechestvennyi opyt: sb. nauchn. statei XI Vseross. Konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem [Development of Political Institutions and Processes: Foreign and Domestic Experience: Coll. of Scientific Papers of the 11th All-Russian Conference with International Participation] (in Russian).
  • Kozlovskii V.V., Nedoseka E.V., Tishkov S.V. (2022). Environmental practices of waste management in the small towns of the European part in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Regionologiya=Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 30, 1(118), 129–154. DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.118.030.202201.129-154 (in Russian).
  • Kulyasov I.P. (2005). Environmental modernization: Theoretical aspects. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 8(3), 100–113 (in Russian).
  • Levashov V.K. (2020). Politicheskaya kul’tura rossiiskogo obshchestva (Opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya): monografiya [Political Culture of Russian Society (Experience of Sociological Research): Monograph]. Moscow: FNISTs RAN. DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-347-8.2021 (in Russian).
  • Levashov V.K., Velikaya N.M., Shushpanova I.S. et al. (2021). Sotsial’noe gosudarstvo i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v usloviyakh realizatsii natsional’nykh proektov: monografiya [Social state and civil society in the context of implementation of nation projects: Monograph]. Moscow: FNISTs RAN. Available at: https://www.fnisc.ru/index.php?page_id=1198&id=9514 (in Russian).
  • Losev A.V., Provadkin G.G. (1998). Sotsial’naya ekologiya [Social Ecology]. Moscow: Gumanitarnyi izd. tsentr “Vlados”.
  • Maslova E.A. (2022). The global “green imperative”: Russia’s place in the international climate regime. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya=Polis. Political Studies, 1, 19–30. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.03 (in Russian).
  • Meadows D., Randers J., Meadows D. (1991). Predely rosta [Limits to Growth]. Translated by Sarkisov A. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU.
  • Mol A.P.J. (1995). The Refinement of Production. Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel.
  • Mol A.P.J., Spaargaren G. (1993). Environment, modernity and the risk-society. The apocalyptic horizon of environmental reforms. International Sociology, 4, 431–459.
  • Oreshkina T.A. (2014). Environmental consciousness of the population in the activities of local government (on the example of old industrial cities of the Ural). Istoriya i sovremennost’=History and Modernity, 2(20), 112–126 (in Russian).
  • Oreshkina T.A., Konyashkin V.A. (2018). Ecological consciousness and ecological discourses of civilization. Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya=Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 4, 133–144 (in Russian).
  • Panov V.I. (2004). Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya: Opyt postroeniya metodologii [Environmental Psychology: Experiences in Methodology]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Rastorguev S.V. (2022). Environmental issues in the election programs of the parliamentary parties of Russia in 2021. Vlast’, 2, 59–65 (in Russian).
  • Shumeiko A.A. (2003). Developing the environmental mentality as a social need. Vestnik KRAUNTs. Gumanitarnye nauki=Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association. Humanities, 1, 46–54 (in Russian).
  • Shushkova E.V., Elbakidze M., Biryukova M.V. (2017). Rationale for the elements of green infrastructure at the regional level. Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal=Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, 2(30), 96–107 (in Russian).
  • Tsepilova O.D. (2019). Political and socio-economic development of modern Russia: Environmental constraints and risks. Teleskop: Zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanii=Telescope: Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research, 2, 20–27 (in Russian).
  • Velikaya N.M. (2019). Sociocultural threats and opportunities for sustainable development. In: Osipov G.V., Ryazantsev S.V., Levashov V.K., Rostovskaya T.K. (Eds.) Strategiya proryva i tsifrovaya real’nost’ Rossii. Sotsial’no-politicheskoe polozhenie i demograficheskaya situatsiya v 2019 godu: koll. Monografiya [Breakthrough Strategy and Russia’s Digital Reality. Socio-Political Situation and Demographic Situation in 2019: Coll. Monograph]. Moscow: Perspektiva (in Russian).
  • Voronov B.A., Narbut N.A. (2013). Ecological framework of the territory and its system properties. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy=Geography and Natural Resources, 3, 171–177 (in Russian).
  • Vorontsov S.A., Ponedelkov A.V., Nuvakhov T.A. (2017). Ecological safety as an integral part of the national security of Russia: Problems and directions of their solution. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravlenie=Science and Education: Economy and Economics; Entrepreneurship; Law and Management, 3(82), 134–137 (in Russian).
  • Weale A. (1992). The New Politics of Pollution. Manchester – New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Wolf E. (1972). Ownership and political ecology. Anthropological Quarterly, 45(3), 201–205.
  • Yanitskii O.N. (2014). The concept of ecosocial knowledge. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 4, 3–13.
Еще
Статья научная