Evaluating digital ecosystems in Russia's regions

Автор: Stepanova Vera V., Ukhanova Anna V., Grigorishchin Aleksei V., Yakhyaev Dilmurad B.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Regional economy

Статья в выпуске: 2 (62) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Successful establishment and functioning of the digital economy is possible only in an adequate digital ecosystem, but the semantic and structural content of this system has not been defined adequately yet. Such uncertainty can be found at different levels (federal, regional and local) and in various aspects: subject-related, branch, segment, technical and others. At the same time, the need to implement effective measures for the development of regional digital ecosystems requires not only an understanding of their qualitative content, but also an accurate quantitative assessment. Our paper analyzes conceptual approaches to the definition of a digital ecosystem, provides our own understanding of its full content, which allows us to build a sufficiently verifiable assessment of digital ecosystems development at the regional level. We present a technique for assessing the development of regional digital ecosystems; according to this technique two integrated indices are calculated, and on this basis we carry out an analysis on 82 constituent entities of Russia over the period of two years. The study reveals the existence of significant differentiation between the regions according to the level of development of digital ecosystems; it also helps identify a number of characteristic types of regions in this context. Our assessment has shown that, along with the majority of the regions where the development of digital ecosystems is defined as average, some regions show opposite trends. There are regions, for example, the Belgorod and Kirov oblasts, in which the conditions for the digital environment are below average, but the level of ecosystem development in them is average or higher. There are regions where the situation is the opposite, i.e. the conditions are quite high, but the level of development of the digital ecosystem as a whole leaves much to be desired. Such a negative example is the Moscow Oblast. We also identify leading regions and problem regions. We hope that a reliable assessment of development of digital ecosystems using our technique will help work out effective solutions for successful promotion of the digital economy in Russia.

Еще

Digital economy, ecosystem of the digital economy, index of activity of the subjects of digitalization, digitalization conditions index, assessment of the level of development of digital ecosystems, regions digitalization matrix

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224171

IDR: 147224171   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.4

Список литературы Evaluating digital ecosystems in Russia's regions

  • Apokin A., Belousov D., Salnikov V., Frolov I. Long-term socioeconomic challenges for russia and demand for new technology. Foresight and STI Governance, 2015, no 4, vol. 9, pp. 6-17. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2015.4.6.17
  • Akatkin Y.M., Karpov O.E., Konyavskiy V.A., Yasinovskaya E.D. Digital economy: conceptual architecture of a digital economic sector ecosystem. Business Informatics, 2017, no. 4, vol. 42, pp. 17-28. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2017.4.17.28
  • Gusakova N.V., Zabalueva A.I., Rumyantseva V.V. Konspekt lektsii po kursu "Ekologiya" . Ed.by A.N. Korolev. Taganrog: TRTU, 2006. 176 p.
  • Plaksin S., Abdrakhmanova G., Kovaleva G. Approaches to defining and measuring russia's internet economy. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, no 1, vol. 11, pp. 55-65.
  • Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L. et al. The Limits to Growth. New York, Potomac, 1974. 235 p.
  • Danilov-Danil'yan V.I., Piskulova N. A. Ustoichivoe razvitie: Novye vyzovy: Uchebnik dlya vuzov . Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2015. 336 p.
  • The Challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility. Towards Constructive Partnership. The Phillip Morris Institute for Public Policy Research ASBL, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  • Belousov K.Yu. Corporate social responsibility as a socio-economic institution. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki=Problems of Modern Economics, 2015, no. 4 (56), pp. 87-90..
  • Jastram S. The link between corporate social responsibility and strategic management. Centre of International Studies Papers, no. 17, 2007, pp. 81-84.
  • Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Harpercollins College Div, 1984. 275 p.
  • Belousov K.Yu. Evolution of perspectives upon the role of management of the interested parties in the sustainable development of a company: identification of stakeholders. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki=Problems of Modern Economics, 2013, no. 4 (48), pp. 418-422..
  • Porter M. Business and society: competitiveness and social responsibility. Harvard Business Review (Russia), 2007, no. 3, pp. 72-86..
  • Porter M., Kramer M. Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism -and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, no. 1-2, pp. 62-77.
  • White B. Total availability of journal articles to internet users. Library Review, 2014, no. 4/5, vol. 63, pp. 295-304.
  • Carroll W.R., Wagar T.H. Is there a relationship between information technology adoption and human resource management? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2010, no. 2, vol. 17, pp. 218-229.
  • Janowsk T. Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 2015, no. 3, vol. 32, pp. 221-236.
  • Sher M.L., Andreeva G.N., Badal'yants S.V., Bogatyreva T.G., Borodai V.A., Dudkina O.V., Zubarev A.E., Kaz'mina L.N., Minasyan L.A., Mironov L.V., Strizhov S.A. Razvitie tsifrovoi ekonomiki v Rossii kak klyuchevoi faktor ekonomicheskogo rosta i povysheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya: monografiya . Nizhny Novgorod: Professional'naya nauka, Smashwords, Inc.15951 Los Gatos USA, 2018. 131 p..
  • Henfridsson О., Bygstad В. The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 2013, no. 3, vol. 37, рр. 907-932.
  • Gunya A.N., Efimov A.B. Degree of development of Russia's territory: national and cultural features and trends. Kul'turnoe nasledie Rossii=Cultural Heritage of Russia, 2016, no. 3(14), pp. 85-91..
  • Esaulov G.V. "Smart" city in a digital economy. ACADEMIA. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo=ACADEMIA. Architecture and Construction, 2017, no. 4, pp. 68-74..
  • Esaulov G.V. From "smart" city to "smart" settlement system. In: Sovremennaya arkhitektura mira . No. 5. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2015. Pp. 9-20.
  • Sapir J. From regional science to "smart cities": intellectual legacies and possible ruptures. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, no. 3, vol. 11, pp. 25-40.
  • DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.3.57.2
  • Karyshev M.Yu. Statistical method for assessing the information economy: searching for an integral indicator. Uchet i statistika=Accounting and Statistics, 2011, no. 4, pp. 74-82..
Еще
Статья научная