Forecasting the dissemination of norms and values in Russia with the use of an agent-based approach

Forecasting the dissemination of norms and values in Russia with the use of an agent-based approach

Автор: Mashkova Aleksandra L.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The paper presents an agent-based model for dissemination of norms and values and the experience of its use for forecasting the dynamics of opinions in Russian society, taking into account the influence of digital media and deterioration of the economic situation in the country. The chosen modeling method helps to predict the dynamics of population, economy and political system, taking into account their mutual influence. Each agent is assigned an appropriate set of norms and values and a model is designed showing how they change under the influence of the agent’s standard of living, communication with acquaintances and impact of the media. The model we present differs from its known analogues due to its connection with the model of artificial society, reflecting the population and economy of Russia on the basis of current data. The behavior of agents in the model is based on the concept of a social agent, which includes the principles of dividing agents into clusters of social activity, a way to represent the norms and values of the agent in the form of a set of options with varying frequency and the function of constructing subjective assessments of the standard of living based on the comparison of the agent with its environment. Information content of the model is based on the analysis of the results of the seventh wave of the World Values Survey concerning the relationship between the income level, assessment of the work of the political system and the norms of social responsibility, which showed a significant degree of correlation between incomes, political assessments and the norms of residents. On the basis of the developed model, we carried out scenario calculations so as to build a forecast of the likely dynamics of public sentiment in various economic conditions. The results obtained indicate a rather significant relationship between the economic situation and the satisfaction of residents with the actions of the government. In the developed model, the change in a person’s beliefs is limited to their inner world; therefore, implementing new aspirations in attempts to change one’s own life or society is an important direction for future research.

Еще

Agent-based model, norms and values, standard of living, digital media, world values survey

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237319

IDR: 147237319

Список литературы Forecasting the dissemination of norms and values in Russia with the use of an agent-based approach

  • Adams J., White G., Araujo R. (2021). The role of mistrust in the modelling of opinion adoption. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24(4), 4. Available at: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/24/4/4.html. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4624
  • Atkinson K., Bench-Capon T. (2016). Value based reasoning and the actions of others. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 285, 680–688. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-680
  • Ceragioli F., Frasca P. (2018). Consensus and disagreement: The role of quantized behaviors in opinion dynamics. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 56, 1058–1080. DOI: 10.1137/16M1083402
  • Chen Z., Lan H. (2021). Dynamics of public opinion: Diverse media and audiences’ choices. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24(2), 8, Available at: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/24/2/8.html. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4552
  • Cranefield S., Winikoff M., Dignum V., Dignum F. (2017). No pizza for you: Value-based plan selection in BDI agents. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Main Track. DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/26
  • Davydov S.G. (2021). Digital compitencies of Russians and work on self-isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 403–422. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1913 (in Russian).
  • Deffuant G., Neau D., Amblard F., Weisbuch G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3, 87–98.
  • Dong Y., Ding Z., Chiclana F., Herrera-Viedma E. (2021). Dynamics of public opinions in an online and offline social network. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(4), 610–618. DOI: 10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2676810
  • Fishbein M., Azjen I. (2011). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Hegselmann R., Krause U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3).
  • Hu H., Zhu J.J. (2017). Social networks, mass media and public opinions. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 12(2), 393–411. DOI: 10.1007/s11403-015-0170-8
  • Iliycheva L.E., Kondrashov A.O., Lapin A.V. (2021). Trust as a bridge over the uncertainty gap between the government and society. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 162–185. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1917 (in Russian).
  • Jiao Y., Li Y. (2021). An active opinion dynamics model: The gap between the voting result and group opinion. Information Fusion, 65, 128–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.009
  • Lapin N.I. (2010). Functional-oriented clusters of basic values of the population of Russia and its regions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 1, 28–36 (in Russian).
  • Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R. (2013). Sotsial’noe modelirovanie – novyi komp’yuternyi proryv (agent-orientirovannye modeli) [Social Modeling – a New Computer Breakthrough (Agent-Oriented Models)]. Moscow: Ekonomika.
  • Mareeva S.V. (2013). Dynamics of norms and values of Russians. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 7, 120–130 (in Russian).
  • Mareeva S.V. (2015). Values in modern Russian society. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 50–65 (in Russian).
  • Martins A.C.R. (2013). Trust in the CODA model: Opinion dynamics and the reliability of other agents. Physics Letters A, 377(37), 2333–2339. DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.007
  • Mashkova A.L., Dembovskii I.A. Novikova E.V. (2019). Formation of the consumer strategy of households in the agent model of sectoral development of the Russian economy. Iskusstvennye obshchestva=Artificial Societies, 14(3) (in Russian).
  • Mashkova A.L., Nevolin I.V., Savina O.A. et al. (2020). Generating social environment for agent-based models of computational economy. In: Chugunov A., Khodachek I., Misnikov Y., Trutnev D. (Eds). Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2020, 1349, 291–305. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67238-6_21
  • Mashkova A.L., Novikova E.V., Savina O.A. et al. (2020). Simulating budget system in the agent model of the Russian Federation spatial development. In: Chugunov A., Khodachek I., Misnikov Y., Trutnev D. (Eds). Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2019, 1135, 17–31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_2
  • Mercuur R., Dignum V., Jonker C. (2019). The value of values and norms in social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22(1), 9, Available at: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/22/1/9.html. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.3929
  • Novikova T.S., Tsyplakov A.A. (2020). Social policy in a multi-regional agent-based model. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(3), 129–142. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.9 (in Russian).
  • Pineda M., Buendía G. (2015). Mass media and heterogeneous bounds of confidence in continuous opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 420, 73–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.10.089
  • Poel I.V., Royakkers L.M. (2011). Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Quattrociocchi W., Conte R., Lodi E. (2011). Opinions manipulation: Media, power and gossip. Advances in Complex Systems, 14(04), 567–586. DOI: 10.1142/S0219525911003165
  • Rogers E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Stauffer D. (2002). Sociophysics: The Sznajd model and its applications. Computer Physics Communications, 46(1), 93–98.
  • Suslov V.I., Domozhirov D.A., Ibragimov N.M. et al. (2016). Agent-based multiregional input-output model of the Russian economy. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody=Economics and Mathematical Methods, 52(1), 112–131 (in Russian).
  • Sznajd-Weron K., Sznajd J. (2000). Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 11(6), 1157–1165.
  • Waigeng Y., Morev M.V., Ukhanova Yu.V., Kosygina K.E. (2021). The effectiveness of the authorities’ activities at the local level in the COVID-19 pandemic (the experience of Russia and China). Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(4), 231–250. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.14 (in Russian).
  • Weisbuch G., Deffuant G., Amblard F., Nadal J.-P. (2002). Meet, discuss, and segregate! Complexity, 7(3), 55–63. DOI:10.1002/cplx.10031
  • Zhang A., Zheng M., Pang B. (2018). Structural diversity effect on hashtag adoption in Twitter. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 493, 267–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.075
  • Zino L., Ye M., Cao M. (2020). A two-layer model for coevolving opinion dynamics and collective decision-making in complex social systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(8), 083107. DOI: 30.083107.10.1063/5.0004787
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©