Forecasting the impact of investments on spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry

Forecasting the impact of investments on spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry

Автор: Naumov Ilya V., Sedelnikov Vladislav M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article investigates uneven spatial development of livestock industry in Russia’s regions. It is caused by many factors, including the volume of attracted investments, human resources; and it endangers the food security of territories. The purpose of the study is to assess spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry in the Sverdlovsk Oblast. To achieve the goal, we set the following tasks: to conduct a spatial autocorrelation analysis of the development of the livestock industry in Sverdlovsk Oblast municipal entities, investigate the impact of human resources investments and costs on the development of spatial heterogeneity in the region’s livestock industry, assess the spatial effects of livestock industry development in territorial systems, design forecast scenarios for its development in the region’s municipal entities up to 2025. Having reviewed theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing spatial heterogeneity at the regional and municipal levels we find out that Russian and foreign researchers use a variety of methods. Their application does not contribute to the comprehensive assessment of spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry. To solve the problem, we propose a methodological approach, whose novelty consists in the comprehensive application of spatial autocorrelation analysis methods using various matrices of spatial weights, regression analysis using panel data and ARIMA modeling which, when combined, make it possible to determine the impact of investments and other factors on heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry in the region’s municipalities and design a system of various forecast scenarios. The regression models we constructed have confirmed the differentiated impact of investments and human resources on spatial heterogeneity in the livestock sector in the Sverdlovsk Oblast and outlined the prospects for its development.

Еще

Investments, livestock industry, spatial heterogeneity, cobb-douglas production function, spatial autocorrelation, scenario forecasting, arima modeling

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240792

IDR: 147240792   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.2.86.5

Список литературы Forecasting the impact of investments on spatial heterogeneity in the development of the livestock industry

  • Arkhipova M.Yu., Smirnov A.I. (2020). Current trends in crop yield forecasting based on the use of econometric models. Voprosy statistiki=Bulletin of Statistics, 27(5), 65–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-5-65-75 (in Russian).
  • Atikah N., Widodo B., Rahardjo S. et al. (2021). The efficiency of Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) parameters estimation on advertisement tax revenue in Malang City. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1821(1), 012012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1821/1/012012
  • Augustine D.J., Booth D.T., Cox S.E., Derner J.D. (2012). Grazing intensity and spatial heterogeneity in bare soil in a grazing-resistant grassland. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 65(1), 39–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2111/rem-d-11-00005.1
  • Bille A.G., Salvioni C., Benedetti R. (2015). Spatial heterogeneity in production functions models. International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE) Agriculture in an Interconnected World, 16. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.211343
  • Brovkova A.V. (2014). Improving methods of statistical analysis of socio-economic inequality and regional convergence in Russia. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2, 113–117 (in Russian).
  • Bulteau J., Feuillet T., Le Boennec R. (2018). Spatial heterogeneity of sustainable transportation offer values: A comparative analysis of Nantes urban and periurban/rural areas (France). Urban Science, 2(1), 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010014
  • Chikuvire T.J., Mpepereki S., Tigere T.A., Foti R. (2006). Exploitation of spatial heterogeneity for food security by smallholder farmers in a semi-arid area of Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 8(2), 15–28. Available at: http://jsd-africa.com/Jsda/Summer_2006/PDF/ARC_ExploitationSpatialHeterogeneityFoodSecurity.pdf
  • Dubrova T.A. (2014). Applying multivariate statistical methods for analysis of the status and trends of the Russian meat market. Voprosy statistiki=Bulletin of Statistics, 8, 67–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2014-0-8-67-75 (in Russian).
  • Fang W., Huang H., Yang B., Hu Q. (2021). Factors on spatial heterogeneity of the grain production capacity in the major grain sales area in Southeast China: Evidence from 530 counties in Guangdong Province. Land, 10(2), 206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020206
  • Gagarina G.Yu., Bolotov R.O. (2021). Valuation of inequality in the Russian federation and its decomposition using the Theil index. Federalizm=Federalism, 26(4)(104), 20–34. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-4-20-34 (in Russian).
  • Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. (2010). Economic development and environmental impact disparities among Russia’s regions. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=The Journal of the New Economic Association, 7, 70–88 (in Russian).
  • Gorbatovskaya O. (2017). Factors and evaluation methods of territorial differentiation agricultural production. Agrarnaya ekonomika=Agrarian Economics, 6, 18–29 (in Russian).
  • Han C., Wang G., Zhang Y. et al. (2020). Analysis of the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and influencing factors of China’s herbivorous animal husbandry industry. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0237827. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237827
  • Khan A.A. (2020). Linking spatial patterns of livestock to the geographical variances in Turkey. Journal of Geography, 40, 109–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0050
  • Koç A.A., Lambert D.M., Bölük G. et al. (2017). A spatial analysis of the relationship between agricultural output and input factors in Turkey. New Medit, A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment, 16(1), 11–17. Available at: https://newmedit.iamb.it/2017/03/15/a-spatial-analysis-of-the-relationship-between-agricultural-output-and-input-factors-in-turkey/
  • Lv F., Deng L., Zhang Z. et al. (2022). Multiscale analysis of factors affecting food security in China, 1980–2017. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(5), 6511–6525. DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-16125-1
  • Malkina M.Yu., Balakin R.V. (2014). Valuation of the concentration and uniformity of the tax revenues distribution in the regions of the Russian Federation on the basis of the Herfindahl – Hirschman, Gini and Theil indices. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie=Taxes and Taxation, 11(11), 1010–1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/1812-8688.2014.11.12546 (in Russian).
  • Patrakova S.S. (2022). Assessing intraregional asymmetry of agricultural production in the Vologda Oblast. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 26(1), 27–42. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2022.1.117.3 (in Russian).
  • Pechenevskii V.F., Snegirev O.I. (2018). Forecasting accommodation and development of production of animal production in the region. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya=Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions, 1(98), 75–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/meps.2018.1/1782 (in Russian).
  • Piet L. (2017). Concentration of the agricultural production in the EU: The two sides of a coin. In: 15 European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) Congress “Towards Sustainable Agri-Food System: Balancing between Markets and Society”, European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE). DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.261439
  • Postnikova E.A., Shiltsin E.A. (2009). Some fragments of the latest trends in regional development. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 3, 67–86 (in Russian).
  • Shi B., Fu Y., Bai X. et al. (2021). Spatial pattern and spatial heterogeneity of Chinese elite hospitals: A country-level analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 710810. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.710810
  • Shouying Y., Qiaoxi F. (2018). Spatial statistical analysis on geographical agglomeration of planting industry in Sichuan Province. In: Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Economics, Social Science, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (ESSAEME 2018). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/essaeme-18.2018.16
  • Sibhatu K.T., Steinhübel L., Siregar H. et al. (2021). Spatial heterogeneity in smallholder oil palm production in Indonesia: Implications for intervention strategies. International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE 2021). Available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/315222/files/0-0_Paper_19141_handout_301_0.pdf
  • Suvorov N.V., Akhunov R.R., Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I., Faizullin F.S. (2020). Applying the Cobb – Douglas production function for analysing the region’s industry. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 16(1), 187–200. DOI: 10.17059/2020-1-14 (in Russian).
  • Tolmachev M.N. (2010). Methodology of calculating the concentration of agricultural production. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki=Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economics Sciences, 10(2), 103–111 (in Russian).
  • Wagle T.P.S. (2016). Spatial analysis of Cobb-Douglas production function in agriculture sector of Nepal: An empirical analysis. Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 3(2), 101–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3126/jaar.v3i2.16759
  • Wenbo M., Weiteng T., Qian Zh., Qianqian M. (2021). Analysis on the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of factors affecting urbanization development based on the GTWR model: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Complexity, 2021, 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7557346
  • Yang W., Jia H., Wang C. et al. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity of household food consumption and nutritional characteristics of grassland transects in Inner Mongolia, China. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.810485
  • Zhang Y., Li B. (2022). Detection of the spatio‐temporal differentiation patterns and influencing factors of wheat production in Huang‐Huai‐Hai region. Foods, 11(11), 1617. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111617
  • Zimin A.F., Timiryanova V.M. (2016). The spatial change of the indicators of consumer market. Vestnik UGUES. Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriya ekonomika=Вulletin USAES. Science. Education. Economy. Series: Economy, 1(15), 44–49 (in Russian).
  • Zubarevich N.V. (2013). Population income inequality: Spatial correction. Pro et Contra, 17(6), 48–60 (in Russian).
  • Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. (2013). The inequality of social and economic development of regions and cities of Russia of the 2000s: Growth or decline? Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 6, 15–26 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp