Framework for Evaluating Business Processes Modeling Techniques under Neutrosophic Environment
Автор: Samah Ibrahim Abdel Aal
Журнал: International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business @ijieeb
Статья в выпуске: 1 vol.17, 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
In today's, dynamic business environment and complexity of its operations make the need for modeling Business Processes (BP) is a very critical. Modeling BP is a very important task for improving BP and achieving business needs and goals. BP modeling techniques are necessary for making BP more understandable and easily maintainable which lead to successful Business Process Management (BPM). There many types of modeling techniques for expressing and modeling business process. However, each one has its own characteristics and not all modeling techniques are suitable to all parts of the process. Therefore, it is critical to determine the right and suitable modeling technique. The problem of evaluating BP modeling techniques has been addressed by many researches. However, there is need to handle uncertainty and take into account costs and benefits of BP modeling techniques during the evaluation process. This work aims to introduce different types of BP modeling techniques and present different views of characteristics, features and quality criteria of BPmodeling techniques that can help the modeler during the evaluation process. Also, this work aims to adapt and introduce neutrosophic framework to handle uncertainty and remove confusion during evaluating and determining the BP modeling suitable technique. Moreover, the proposed framework utilizes the neutrosophic benefits and costs method with simple way to improve its use and to balance between benefits and costs during the evaluation process. The proposed framework is applied to a real world case study and the results concluded that the proposed framework can be adopted by business organizations and institutes that need for determining the suitable BP modeling technique to improve their business processes. Also, the results concluded that the utilization of proposed framework can be helpful for handling uncertainty during the evaluation process.
Business Processes (BP), Business Process Management (BPM), Single Valued Triangular Neutrosophic Numbers (SVTrN-numbers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15019657
IDR: 15019657 | DOI: 10.5815/ijieeb.2025.01.01
Список литературы Framework for Evaluating Business Processes Modeling Techniques under Neutrosophic Environment
- Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M. and Green, P., Business process modeling-a comparative analysis. Journal of the association for information systems, 2009,Vol. 10, No. 4.
- Aalst V., MP W., Business process simulation survival guide." Handbook on Business Process Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015, pp.337-370.
- Őri, D. and Szabó, Z., A Conceptual Blueprint for Enterprise Architecture Model-Driven Business Process Optimization. In Business Process Management: Blockchain and Central and Eastern Europe Forum: BPM 2019 Blockchain and CEE Forum, Vienna, Austria, Springer International Publishing, 2019 ,pp. 234-248.
- Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J. and Reijers, H.A., Fundamentals of business process management, Heidelberg: Springer, 2018, Vol. 2.
- Scheer, A.W., Abolhassan, F., Jost, W. and Kirchmer, M., 2002. Business process excellence: ARIS, 2002 practice.
- Athanasopoulou, A. and De Reuver, M., How do business model tools facilitate business model exploration? Evidence from action research, Electronic Markets, 2020, vol. 30, pp.495-508.
- Olofsson, L. and Farr, R., 2006. Business model tools and definition-a literature review. Vivace Consortium.
- Kulkarni, P.P., 2019. A qualitative analysis of the ‘experiential learning’of business school students and graduates through their participation in The University of Manchester’s annual business start-up competition. Entrepreneurship Education, 2(3-4), pp.149-169.
- Mousa A., Shiratuddin N., Bakar M., Evaluation Framework for Business Process Evaluation Approaches, Journal of Computer Science & Computational Mathematics, 2016, Vol 6.
- Lapalme, James, Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: A Zachman perspective, Computers in Industry, 2016, vol.79, pp.103-113.
- Guizania K, and Ghannouchia S., An approach for selecting a business process modeling language that best meets the requirements of a modeler, International Conference on Project MANagement / HCist - International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies 2020 , Available online at www.sciencedirect.comScienceDirect Procedia Computer Science, 2021, pp. 843–851.
- Aldin, L. and De Cesare, S., A comparative analysis of business process modeling techniques, 2009, UK Academy for Information Systems Conference.
- Weske, M., Business process management architectures, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 305-343.
- Krogstie, John. Perspectives to process modeling. Business Process Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. pp.1-39.
- Farshidi S., Kwantes I.,• Jansen S.,, Business process modeling language selection for research modelers, Software and Systems Modeling, Springer, 2024, pp. 137–162 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01110-8.
- Gabryelczyk, R. and Jurczuk, A., The diagnosis of information potential of selected business process modeling notations. Information Systems in Management, 2015. 4(1), pp.26-38.
- Abdel-Fattah M, Khedr A., Aldeen Y., An Evaluation Framework for Business Process Modeling Techniques, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 2017, Vol. 15, No. 5.
- Jin G., Jin G., and Huo H., Selection of Business Process Modeling Tool with the Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL and TOPSIS Method, MDPI, Axioms 2022, 11, 601.
- Trauer, J., Wöhr, F., Eckert, C., Kannengiesser, U., Knippenberg, S., Sankowski, O., & Zimmermann, M., Criteria for selecting design process modeling approaches. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1(ICED21), 2021), pp.791-800. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.79
- Looy, Van A., Backer M., and Poels G., A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity, Enterprise Information Systems 2014, pp. 188-224.
- AboElHamd E., Shamma H, Saleh M., El-Khodary I.,Neutrosophic Logic Theory and Applications, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, University of New Mexico Vol. 41, 2021, pp.30-51.
- Abdel-Basset, M.; Mohamed, M.; Chang, V. NMCDA: A framework for evaluating cloud computing services, Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 86, 12–29.
- McCaffrey, J.D. Using the multi-attribute global inference of quality (MAGIQ) technique for software testing. In Proceedings of the Information Technology: New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2009, pp. 27–29.
- Abdel-Basset M. , Mohamed M., Victor Chang V., and Smarandache F., IoT and Its Impact on the Electronics Market: A Powerful Decision Support System for Helping Customers in Choosing the Best Product, Symmetry, 2019, vol. 11, 611; doi:10.3390/sym11050611
- Pereira J and Silva1 D, Business Process Modeling Languages: A Comparative Framework. In: . Rocha et al. (eds.), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 444, (2016), Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016, vol. 444, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_58
- Kaschek R, Roman Pavlov R, Shekhovtsov V, and Zlatkin S, Towards Selecting Among Business Process Modeling Methodologies, 2006, Journal of Business Information Systems, pp. 28- 46
- Pietroń R, Best Practices In Business Process Modelling, Information Systems in Management (2016) Vol. 5 (4) 551-562
- Lopes T and Guerreiro S, Assessing business process models: a literature review on techniques for BPMN testing and formal verification, Business Process Management Journal, Emerald Publishing Limited 1463-7154, Vol. 29 No. 8, 2023 pp. 133-162, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2022-0557
- Tian Z, Zhang H., Wang J. , Wang J., and Chen X., Multi-criteria decision-making method based on a cross-entropy with interval neutrosophic sets, 2015, International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis