Функциональное состояние почечной паренхимы после различных видеоэндохирургических методов лечения больных с крупными и сложными камнями почек

Автор: Пак Ю.Г., Ягудаев Д.М., Галлямов Э.А.

Журнал: Хирургическая практика @spractice

Рубрика: Статьи

Статья в выпуске: 3 (47), 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Работа основана на анализе данных литературы, посвященной проблеме сохранения функционального состояния почек при различных видеоэндоскопических методах оперативного лечения крупных и сложных камней почек. Цель обзора освещение вероятности ухудшения функционального состояния почек в послеоперационном периоде. Проведен детальный анализ послеоперационных исходов при различных малоинвазивных методах лечения больных с крупными и сложными камнями почек с обзором возможности применения динамической нефросцинтиграфии как метода объективной оценки функционального состояния почек.

Мочекаменная болезнь, крупные камни почек, функциональное состояние почек, эндохирургическое лечение нефролитиаза, нефросцинтиграфия

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142231921

IDR: 142231921   |   DOI: 10.38181/2223-2427-2021-3-5-21

Список литературы Функциональное состояние почечной паренхимы после различных видеоэндохирургических методов лечения больных с крупными и сложными камнями почек

  • Б.К. Комяков. Урология. Учебник, Изд. ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2012. 464 с. [B. K. Komyakov. Urologiya: uchebnik – 2012. – 464 s.: il. (In Russ.)]
  • K.K. Stamatelou, M.E. Francis, C.A. Jones, L.M. Nyberg, G.C. Curhan. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003; 63:1817–1823. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x.
  • T.H. Brikowski, Y. Lotan, M.S. Pearle. Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008 Jul 15; 105(28): 9841–9846. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709652105. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
  • J.S. Cramer, K. Forrest. Renal lithiasis: Addressing the risks of austere desert deployments. Aviation Space Environ Med. 2006; 77:649–653.
  • Y-K Chen, H-C Lin, C-S Chen, S-D Yeh. Seasonal variations in urinary calculi attacks and their association with climate: A population-based study. J Urol. 2008;179:564–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.067. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
  • K. Evans, R.A. Costabile. Time to development of symptomatic urinary calculi in a high-risk environment. J Urol. 2005;173:858–861. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000152578.07262.1c.
  • K.B. Dallas, S.Conti, J.C. Liao, M. Sofer, A.C. Pao, J.T. Leppert, C. S. Elliott. Redefining the Stone Belt: Precipitation Is Associated with Increased Risk of Urinary Stone Disease. J Endourol. 2017 Nov 1; 31(11): 1203–1210. Published online 2017 Nov 1. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0456
  • J. B. Ziemba, B.R. Matlaga. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep; 58(5): 299–306. Published online 2017 Aug 10. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299
  • S. R. Khan,1 M. S. Pearle, W. G. Robertson, G. Gambaro, B. K. Canales,S. Doizi, O. Traxer, H. Tiselius. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Feb 25; 2: 16008. Published online 2016 Feb 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.8
  • B.W. Turney, J.M. Reynard, J.G. Noble, S.R. Keoghane. Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int. 2012;109:1082–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10495.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
  • D. Prezioso, E. Illiano, G. Piccinocchi, C. Cricelli, R. Piccinocchi, A. Saita, C. Micheli, A. Trinchieri. Urolithiasis in Italy: an epidemiological study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Jun 30;86(2):99-102. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.2.99
  • J. Bauer, A. Kahlmeyer, R. Stredele, B.G. Volkmer. Inpatient therapy of urinary stones in Germany: development of the G-DRG system. Urologe A. 2014 Dec;53(12):1764-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3720-0.
  • H.H. Kim, M.K. Jo, C. Kwak, S.K. Park, K.Y. Yoo, D. Kang, et al. Prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of urolithiasis in Seoul, Korea. Urology. 2002;59:517–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01606-5.
  • T. Yasui, M. Iguchi, S. Suzuki, K. Kohri. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: national trends between 1965 and 2005. Urology. 2008;71:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.034.
  • S.R. Bae, J.M. Seong, L.Y. Kim, S.H. Paick, H.G. Kim, Y.S. Lho, et al. The epidemiology of reno-ureteral stone disease in Koreans: a nationwide population-based study. Urolithiasis. 2014;42:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0643-6. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
  • S.A. Strope, J.S. Wolf, B.K. Hollenbeck. Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease. Urology. 2010;75:543–546.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
  • C.J. Boyce, P.J. Pickhardt, E.M. Lawrence, D.H. Kim, R.J. Bruce. Prevalence of urolithiasis in asymptomatic adults: objective determination using low dose noncontrast computerized tomography. J Urol. 2010;183:1017–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.047. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
  • C.D. Scales, Jr., G. E. Tasian, A. L. Schwaderer, D. S. Goldfarb, R. A. Star, Z. Kirkali. Urinary Stone Disease: Advancing Knowledge, Patient Care, and Population Health. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Jul 7; 11(7): 1305–1312. Published online 2016 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.13251215
  • S. Alatab, G. Pourmand, El Howairis Mel F, N. Buchholz, I. Najafi, M.R. Pourmand, R. Mashhadi, N. Pourmand. National Profiles of Urinary Calculi: a Comparison Between Developing and Developed Worlds. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2016 Mar;10(2):51-61.
  • О.И. Аполихин, А.В. Сивков, Д.А. Бешлиев, Т.В. Солнцева, В.А. Комарова, Е.В. Зайцевская. Анализ урологической заболеваемости в Российской Федерации в 2002-2009 годах по данным официальной статистики. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2011;(1): 4-10. [O.I. Apolikhin, A.V. Sivkov, D.A. Beshliev, T.V. Solntseva, V.A. Komarova, E.V. Zaitsevskaya. Analiz urologicheskoi zabolevaemosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2002-2009 godakh po dannym ofitsial'noi statistiki. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya 2011;(1): 4-10. (In Russ.)]
  • А.Д. Каприн, О.И. Аполихин, А.В. Сивков, Т.В. Солнцева, В.А. Комарова. Анализ уронефрологической заболеваемости и смертности в Российской Федерации за период 2002-2014 гг. по данным официальной статистики. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2016;(3): 4-13. [A.D. Kaprin, O.I. Apolikhin, A.V. Sivkov, T.V. Solntseva, V.A. Komarova. Analiz uronefrologicheskoi zabolevaemosti i smertnosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za period 2002-2014 gg. po dannym ofitsial'noi statistiki. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya 2016;(3): 4-13. (In Russ.)]
  • О.И. Аполихин, А.В. Сивков, В.А. Комарова, М.Ю. Просянников, С.А. Голованов, А.В. Казаченко, А.А. Никушина, В.А. Шадеркина. Заболеваемость мочекаменной болезнью в Российской Федерации (2005-2016 годы). Экпериментальная и клиническая урология 2018;(4). [O.I. Apolikhin, A.V. Sivkov, V.A. Komarova, M.Yu. Prosyannikov, S.A. Golovanov, A.V. Kazachenko, A.A. Nikushina, V.A. Shaderkina. Zabolevaemost' mochekamennoi bolezn'yu v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (2005-2016 gody). Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya 2018;(4). (In Russ.)]
  • М.К. Алчинбаев. Мочекаменная болезнь в Республике Казахстан. Сборник трудов I Съезда урологов стран СНГ и XIV Конференции молодых ученых – медиков стран СНГ, посвященные 25 – летию независимости Республики Казахстан и АО «Научный центр урологии имени академика Б.У. Джарбусынова». – Астана, 2016. – 8-26 стр. [M.K. Alchinbaev. Mochekamennaya bolezn' v Respublike Kazakhstan. Sbornik trudov I S"ezda urologov stran SNG i XIV Konferentsii molodykh uchenykh – medikov stran SNG, posvyashchennye 25 – letiyu nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan i AO «Nauchnyi tsentr urologii imeni akademika B.U. Dzharbusynova». – Astana, 2016. – 8-26 str. (In Russ.)]
  • F. Kum, W. Mahmalji, J. Hale, K. Thomas, M. Bultitude, J. Glass. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999-2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):140-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13409. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
  • A.D. Rule, E.J. Bergstralh, L.J. Melton III, X. Li, A.L. Weaver, J.C. Lieske. Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:804–811. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05811108. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
  • R.T. Alexander, B.R. Hemmelgarn, N. Wiebe, A. Bello, C. Morgan, S. Samuel, et al. Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e5287. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5287.
  • K. Sakhaee, N.M. Maalouf, R. Kumar, A. Pasch, O.W. Moe. Nephrolithiasis-associated bone disease: pathogenesis and treatment options. Kidney Int. 2011;79:393–403.https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.473. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
  • H.W. Kang, et al. Effect of renal insufficiency on stone recurrence in patients with urolithiasis. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29:1132–1137. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.8.1132.Epub 2014 Jul 30.
  • A.P. Evan, et al. Contrasting histopathology and crystal deposits in kidneys of idiopathic stone formers who produce hydroxy apatite, brushite, or calcium oxalate stones. Anat Rec. (Hoboken) 2014;297:731–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22881. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
  • C. Kristensen, J.H. Parks, M. Lindheimer, F.L. Coe. Reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypercalciuria in primary struvite nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 1987;32:749–753. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1987.270.
  • V.K. Sigurjonsdottir, H.L. Runolfsdottir, O.S. Indridason, R. Palsson, V.O. Edvardsson. Impact of nephrolithiasis on kidney function. BMC Nephrol. 2015; 16: 149. Published online 2015 Aug 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0126-1.
  • M.T. Keddis, A.D. Rule. Nephrolithiasis and loss of kidney function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22(4):390–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0b013e32836214b9.
  • V.O. Edvardsson, D.S. Goldfarb, J.C. Lieske, L. Beara-Lasic, F. Anglani, D.S. Milliner, et al. Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28(10):1923–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2329-z.
  • N.A. Saucier, M.K. Sinha, K.V. Liang, A.E. Krambeck, A.L. Weaver, E.J. Bergstralh, et al. Risk factors for CKD in persons with kidney stones: a case–control study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(1):61–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.008.
  • A. Evan, J. Lingeman, F.L. Coe, E. Worcester. Randall’s plaque: pathogenesis and role in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2006;69(8):1313–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000238.
  • A.P. Evan, J.E. Lingeman, F.L. Coe, Y. Shao, J.H. Parks, S.B. Bledsoe, et al. Crystal-associated nephropathy in patients with brushite nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2005;67(2):576–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.67114.x.
  • D.L. Gillen, E.M. Worcester, F.L. Coe. Decreased renal function among adults with a history of nephrolithiasis: a study of NHANES III. Kidney Int. 2005;67(2):685–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.67128.x.
  • F. Knauf, J.R. Asplin, I. Granja, I.M. Schmidt, G.W. Moeckel, R.J. David, et al. NALP3-mediated inflammation is a principal cause of progressive renal failure in oxalate nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2013;84(5):895–901. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.207.
  • J.C. Lieske. New insights regarding the interrelationship of obesity, diet, physical activity, and kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(2):211–2. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013111189.
  • Y. Kohjimoto, Y. Sasaki, M. Iguchi, N. Matsumura, T. Inagaki, I. Hara. Association of metabolic syndrome traits and severity of kidney stones: results from a nationwide survey on urolithiasis in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(6):923–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.028.
  • M. Ordon, et al. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis. J Urol. 2014;192:1450–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.095.Epub 2014 May 24.
  • A. Diri, B. Diri. Management of staghorn renal stones. Ren Fail. 2018; 40(1): 357–362. Published online 2018 Apr 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306.
  • G. Zeng, Z. Zhao, S. Wan, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases. J Endourol. 2013;27:1203–1208. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0061.
  • K.R. Ghani, J.D. Sammon, N. Bhojani, P.I. Karakiewicz, M. Sun, S. Sukumar, et al. Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States. J Urol. 2013;190(2):558–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.036. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
  • D. Barnaba, F.S. Grossi, M. Raguso, M. Larocca, G. Salustio, S. Di Lena, et al. Percutaneous treatment of staghorn stones: a retrospective case-control study with evaluation of single vs multiple access to the kidney. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009;81(1):40–2.
  • C. Türk, T. Knoll, A. Petrik, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
  • M. Desai, Y. Sun, N. Buchholz, et al. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring. World J Urol. 2017;35:1395–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
  • A.P. Ganpule, M. Vijayakumar, A. Malpani, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. Int J Surg. 2016;36:660–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028.
  • F. Ozgor, B Ucpinar, M Binbay. Effect of Obesity on Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: A Systemic Review. Urol J. 2016 Mar 5;13(1):2471-8.
  • S.A.H. Rizvi, M. Hussain, S.H. Askari, A. Hashmi, M. Lal, M.N. Zafar. Surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 3402 patients and results of stone analysis in 1559 patients. BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):702-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13848. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
  • X. Liu, G. Huang, R. Zhong, S. Hu, R. Deng. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Regional versus General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):132-142. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491021. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
  • G.M. Kamphuis, J. Baard, M. Westendarp, J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette. Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. World J Urol. 2015;33:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1367-5. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
  • S. Lahme. Miniaturisation of PCNL. Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):99-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1029-3. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
  • D.B. Hennessey, N.K. Kinnear, A. Troy, D. Angus, D.M. Bolton, D.R. Webb. Mini PCNL for renal calculi: does size matter? BJU Int. 2017 May;119 Suppl 5:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13839.
  • T. Akman, et al. Tubeless procedure is most important factor in reducing length of hospitalization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of univariable and multivariable models. Urology. 2011;77:299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.060. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
  • M.G. Pradeepa, M.M. Sinha, K. Tyagi. The halo sign during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy puncture. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10:E130. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3353.
  • M. Usawachintachit, S. Masic, H.C. Chang, et al. Ultrasound guidance to assist percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces radiation exposure in obese patients. Urology. 2016;98:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.012.Epub 2016 Apr 22.
  • A.P. Ganpule, D.H. Shah, M.R. Desai. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy bleeding aetiology and management. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(2):189–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000025.
  • F.C. Vicentini, R. Perrella, V.M.G. Souza, M. Hisano, C.B. Murta, J.F.A. Claro. Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Sep-Oct;44(5):965-971. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0163.
  • M.İ. Gökce, A. Ibiş, A. Sancı, A. Akıncı, U. Bağcı, E.A. Ağaoğlu, et al. Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones. Urolithiasis. 2017;45:603–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0977-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
  • J.G. Valdivia, R.M. Scarpa, M. Duvdevani, A.J. Gross, R.B. Nadler, K. Nutahara, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol. 2011;25:1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0110.Epub 2011 Aug 30.
  • F.C. Vicentini, G.S. Marchini, E. Mazzucchi, J.F. Claro, M. Srougi. Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology. 2014;83:1248–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
  • G.S. Marchini, F.C. Berto, F.C. Vicentini, C.J. Shan, M. Srougi, E. Mazzucchi. Preoperative planning with noncontrast computed tomography in the prone and supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a practical overview. J Endourol. 2015;29:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0299.
  • M. Sofer, G. Giusti, S. Proietti, I. Mintz, M. Kabha, H. Matzkin, et al. Upper Calyx Approachability through a Lower Calyx Access for Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2016;195:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.101. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
  • H.H. Nour, A.M. Kamal, E.G. Samir, A.S. Zayed, M.M. Rushdy, A.G. El-Baz, et al. Single-step renal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized study. Arab J Urol. 2014;12(3):219–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
  • A. Srivastava, S. Singh, I.R. Dhayal, P.A. Rai. Prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World j urol. 2017;35(5):803–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1929-9. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
  • Y. Li, L. Yang, P. Xu, S. Qian, W. Wei, J. Wang, et al. One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):443–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0583-6. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
  • C. Dehong, L. Liangren, L. Huawei, W. Qiang. Comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(6):523–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0598-z. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
  • S. Amirhassani, S.H. Mousavi-Bahar, A. Iloon Kashkouli, S. Torabian. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of one-shot and telescopic metal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(3):269–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0644-5. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
  • A.R. El-Nahas, A.M. Elshal, N.A. El-Tabey, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: a randomized trial comparing high-power holmium laser versus ultrasonic lithotripsy. BJU Int. 2016;118:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13418. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
  • D. Jiao, Z. Zhang, Z. Sun, Y. Wang, X. Han. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: C-arm CT with 3D virtual navigation in non-dilated renal collecting systems. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018 Jan; 24(1): 17–22. Published online 2017 Dec 19. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2017.17079.
  • T. Knoll, F. Daels, J. Desai, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique. World J Urol. 2017;35:1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2001-0. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
  • J. Wang, Y. Yang, M. Chen, et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
  • J.P. Geraghty, B.K. Somani. Worldwide Trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2017;31(6):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895.
  • P. Jones, M. Elmussareh, O.M. Aboumarzouk, P.Mucksavage, B.K. Somani. Role of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Mar 7;19(4):27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0764-5.
  • M. Bagcioglu, A. Demir, H. Sulhan, M.A. Karadag, M. Uslu, U.Y. Tekdogan. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(4):339–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0828-7. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
  • B. Pullar, E. Havranek, T.J. Blacker, S.N. Datta, B. Somani, S. Sriprasad, H. Ratan, S. Scriven, S. Choong, R.D. Smith, S. Mackie. Early multicentre experience of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the UK. J Clin Urol. 2016;8:2051415816658416.
  • T. Karakan, M.F. Kilinc, O.G. Doluoglu, Y. Yildiz, C.N. Yuceturk, M. Bagcioglu, M.A. Karagöz, O. Bas, B. Resorlu. The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis. 2016;12:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0890-9. Epub 2016 May 12.
  • D. Schilling, T. Husch, M. Bader, et al. Nomenclature in PCNL or the tower of babel: a proposal for a uniform terminology. World J Urol. 2015;33(11):1905–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1506-7.
  • P. Jones, O. Aboumarzouk, S. Griffin, B.K. Somani. Role of minimally invasive PCNL techniques: micro and ultra-mini PCNL (<15Fr) in the paediatric population—a systematic review. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):816-824. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0136. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
  • Y. Liu, W. Wu, A. Tuerxun, Y. Liu, A. Simayi, J. Huang, A. Batuer, Y. Zhou, J. Luo, W. Zhong, Z. Zhao. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis: evaluation of the initial results. Journal of Endourology.2017 Apr;31(S1):S38-S42. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0572. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
  • O. Traxer, G. Wendt-Nordahl, H. Sodha, J. Rassweiler, S. Meretyk, A. Tefekli, F. Coz, J.J. de la Rosette. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):21372144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8.
  • J. Armitage, S. Irving, N. Burgess. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of prospective data registry. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.003.
  • A. Wright, N. Rukin, D. Smith, J. De la Rosette, B.K. Somani. Mini, ultra, micro’—nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8(2):142–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215617674.
  • P.M.W. Tirtayasa, P. Yuri, P. Birowo, et al. Safety of tubeless or totally tubeless drainage and nephrostomy tube as a drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comprehensive review. Asian J Surg. 2016;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.03.003.
  • U. Sharma, S. S. Yadav, V. Tomar. Factors influencing recoverability of renal function after urinary diversion through percutaneous nephrostomy. Urol Ann. 2015 Oct-Dec; 7(4): 499–503. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.157960.
  • J. Wang, C. Zhao, C. Zhang, et al. Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012; 109:918–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x.
  • Q. Zhong, C. Zheng, J. Mo, et al. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0421.
  • G. Song, X. Guo, G. Niu, et al. Advantages of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of preschool children under 3 years old. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50:655–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.042.
  • Y. Lu, J.G. Ping, X.J. Zhao, et al. Randomized prospective trial of tubeless versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2013;31:1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0921-2.
  • M.S. Agrawal, M. Sharma, K. Agarwal. Tubeless percutaneous Nephrolithotomy using Antegrade tether: a randomized study. J Endourol. 2014;28:644–648. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0693.
  • P.T. Zhao, D.M. Hoenig, A.D. Smith, et al. A randomizedcontrolled comparison of nephrostomy drainage vs ureteral stent following percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the Wisconsin stone QOL. J Endourol. 2016;30:1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0235.
  • A. Sebaey, M.M. Khalil, T. Soliman, et al. Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Arab journal of urology. 2016;14:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.005.
  • S. Kumar, S. Singh, P. Singh, et al. Day care PNL using 'Santosh-PGI hemostatic seal' versus standard PNL: a randomized controlled study. Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):190-7.https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.792. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
  • Y. Xun, Q. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Lu, J. Zhang, B. Qin, Y. Geng, S. Wang. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2.
  • J.E. Abbott, S.G. Deem, N. Mosley, et al. Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology annals. 2016;8:70–75. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.162214.
  • Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, Breda A, Botoca M, Rassweiler J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, de la Rosette J. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1293-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
  • P. Nikić, O. Durutović, B. Kajmaković, D. Nale, U. Bumbaširević, M. Radovanović, et al. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL)--our experience and literature review. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2014;61(1):51–6. PMID: 25782226
  • D. Opondo, S. Gravas, A. Joyce, M. Pearle, T. Matsuda, Y.H. Sun, et al. Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):767-74. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0057. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
  • S. Kumar, R. Keshavamurthy, V. S. Karthikeyan, A. Mallya. Complications after prone PCNL in pediatric, adult and geriatric patients – a single center experience over 7 years. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jul-Aug; 43(4): 704–712. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0563.
  • H. Ozturk. Tubeless versus standard PCNL in geriatric population. Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Oct;39(8):494-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
  • N.K. Goyal, A. Goel, S.N. Sankhwar, V. Singh, B.P. Singh, R.J. Sinha, et al. A critical appraisal of complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in paediatric patients using adult instruments. BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):801-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12506. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
  • J.J. de la Rosette, D. Opondo, F.P. Daels, G. Giusti, A. Serrano, S.V. Kandasami, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):246-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
  • M.S. Michel, L. Trojan, J.J. Rassweiler. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007 Apr;51(4):899-906; discussion 906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
  • Yu J, Choi JM, Lee J, Kwon K, Kong YG, Seo H, Hwang JH, Park HK, Kim YK. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective observational analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016 Aug;95(35):e4513. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004513.
  • Joung KW, Choi SS, Kong YG, Yu J, Lim J, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury after radical cystectomy: importance of preoperative serum uric acid level. Int J Med Sci. 2015 Jul 16;12(7):599-604. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.12106. eCollection 2015.
  • Caddeo G, Williams ST, McIntyre CW, Selby NM. Acute kidney injury in urology patients: incidence, causes and outcomes. Nephrourol Mon. 2013 Nov;5(5):955-61. https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.12721. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
  • Hobson C, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Kuxhausen A, Thottakkara P, Efron PA, Moore FA, Moldawer LL, Segal MS, BihoracA. Cost and mortality associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1207-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000732.
  • J. Yu, H.K. Park, H.J. Kwon, J. Lee, J.H. Hwang, H.Y. Kim, Y.K. Kim. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Implications of intraoperative hypotension. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11580. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011580.
  • Sun LY, Wijeysundera DN, Tait GA, Beattie WS.. Association of intraoperative hypotension with acute kidney injury after elective noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep; 123(3):515-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000765.
  • Hallqvist L, Granath F, Huldt E, Bell M.. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with acute kidney injury in noncardiac surgery: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Apr;35(4):273-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000735.
  • Cheung CC, Martyn A, Campbell N, Frost S, Gilbert K, Michota F, Seal D, Ghali W, Khan NA. Predictors of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia. Am J Med. 2015 May;128(5):532-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.11.030.Epub 2014 Dec 22.
  • L.S. Chawla, P.L. Kimmel. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: an integrated clinical syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012 Sep;82(5):516-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.208. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
  • Venkatachalam MA, Griffin KA, Lan R, Geng H, Saikumar P, Bidani AK. Acute kidney injury: a springboard forprogression in chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010 May;298(5):F1078-94. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00017.2010. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
  • X. Wang, S. Li, T. Liu, Y. Guo, Z. Yang. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a metaanalysis.J Urol. 2013;190(3):888–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092.
  • Y. Bai, Y. Tang, L. Deng, X. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Wang, P. Han. Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7. Review.
  • S. Li, T.Z. Liu, X.H. Wang, X.T. Zeng, G. Zeng, Z.H. Yang, H. Weng, Z. Meng, J.Y. Huang. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. J Endourol. 2014;28(8):946–950. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0064.
  • F. Soucy, R. Ko, M. Duvdevani, L. Nott, J.D. Denstedt, H. Razvi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center's experience over 15 years. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.1534.
  • H.R. Gandhi, A. Thomas, B. Nair, G. Pooleri. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: an emerging tool for complex staghorn nephrolithiasis in high-risk patients. Arab J Urol. 2015;13(2):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2014.10.004.
  • J.W. Lee, S.Y. Cho, C.W. Jeong, J. Yu, H. Son, H. Jeong, S.J. Oh, H.H. Kim, S.B. Lee. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the Pelvocalyceal system. J Laparoendosc Adv S. 2014;24(9):634–639. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0046.
  • Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A, El-Sergany R, Abdel-Rassoul MA, Elshenofy A, Ghamrawy H, El Bary AA, Fayad T. Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: Evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):775-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0771
  • Basiri A, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A, Arab D, Rezaeetalab GH, Hosseini Sharifi SH, Soltani MH. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: A randomized clinical trial. Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1932-7. PMID: 25433470.
  • De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):125-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003
  • A. Aminsharifi, D. Irani, M. Masoumi, B. Goshtasbi, A. Aminsharifi, R. Mohamadian. The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(6):551–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
  • Zhao C, Yang H, Tang K, Xia D, Xu H, Chen Z, Ye Z. Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016 Nov;44(6):479-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0862-0
  • Chipde SS, Agrawal S. Retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the management of large renal pelvic stone. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):123-4;discussion 124. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.18
  • Nottingham CU, Cohen AJ, Packiam VT, Pariser JJ, Gerber GS. Hospital-Based Analysis of Trends and Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Pyelolithotomy. J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):78-84. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0672
  • Handa RK, Johnson CD, Connors BA, Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Liu Z. Percutaneous Renal Access: Surgical Factors Involved in the Acute Reduction of Renal Function. J Endourol.2016 Feb;30(2):178-83. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0542
  • F.T. Chen, F.C. Liu, C.W. Cheng, J.R. Lin, H.P. Yu. Postoperative Renal Outcomes of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Pyelolithotomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 2;2018:8582901. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8582901
  • I. Cicekbilek, B. Resorlu, U. Oguz, C. Kara, A. Unsal. Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: Assessment by quantitative SPECT of 99mTc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys. Ren Fail. 2015;37(7):1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2015.1056063
  • R. Singal, S. Dhar. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in renal pelvic stone versus open surgery – a comparative study. Clujul Med. 2018;91(1):85-91. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-732
  • C. Qin, W. Shangqian, L. Pu, C. Qiang, S. Pengfei, L. Pengchao, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic technique in treatment of complex renal stones: 75 cases. BMC Urol. 2014 Feb 4;14:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-16
  • G. Keramida, J.M. James, M.C. Prescott, A.M. Peters. Pitfalls and Limitations of Radionuclide Renal Imaging in Adults. Semin Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;45(5):428-39. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.02.008
  • D.L. Nguyen, C. de Labriolle-Vaylet, E. Durand, P.X. Fernandez, F. Bonnin, D. Deliu, F.L. Besson, P. Chaumet-Riffaud. Reproducibility of differential renal function measurement using technetium-99m-ethylenedicysteine dynamic renal scintigraphy: a French prospective multicentre study. Nucl Med Commun. 2018 Jan;39(1):10-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000769
  • S.A. Çamlar, N. Deveci, A. Soylu, M.A. Türkmen, D. Özmen, G. Çapakaya, S. Kavukçu.The role of dynamic renal scintigraphy on clinical decision making in hydronephrotic children. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017 Jan-Feb;28(1):76-80. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.198146.
  • ACR STANDARDS. Renal scintigraphy. ACR Standards for the performance of adult and pediatric renal scintigraphy. 2002;481-484.
  • T.A. Veitch. Pediatric nuclear medicine. Part I: Developmental cues. T.A. Veitch. J. Nucl. Med. Technology. 2000 Mar;28(1):3-7;
  • ACR Standart Book by the Committee on Standards of the Commission on Nuclear Medicine. Renal Scintigraphy, 1999;481-484.
Еще
Статья научная