Genetic profiling and drug-resistance pattern of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients and their household contacts in north Indian population
Автор: Kumar Rajeev, Kushwaha R.A.S.
Журнал: Журнал стресс-физиологии и биохимии @jspb
Статья в выпуске: 2 т.18, 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is important to understand the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of tuberculosis (TB). However, there is limited information on molecular characteristics and drug-resistant patterns of MTB in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in India. Thus, this study aimed to determine the molecular characteristics and drug resistance patterns of MTB in patients with PTB in India.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, prevention of tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, india
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/143178655
IDR: 143178655
Текст научной статьи Genetic profiling and drug-resistance pattern of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients and their household contacts in north Indian population
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health problem and is the leading cause of death from a single bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex. The emergence and spread of drug-resistant strains aggravate the problem, especially in tuberculosis high burden countries such as India. The supposedly high initial cost of laboratory diagnosis coupled with scarce financial resources has limited collection of information about drug resistance patterns and circulating strains in peripheral and emerging regions of India. Here, we investigated drug susceptibility and genetic diversity of mycobacterial isolates among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in the region and its surroundings in Eastern region of India.
The study of genetic diversity and drug susceptibility profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) will help understand the transmission dynamics and can be used for better prevention and control of the disease. The aim of this study was to determine the drug susceptibility profiles and genetic diversity using the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number of tandem repeats (MIRU VNTR) of MTB isolates from sputum samples of pulmonary TB patients residing in the two slums of Lucknow city in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tuberculosis (TB), a highly contagious disease that sees no gender, age, or race is mainly a disease of lungs. According to World Health Organization, a TB patient can be completely cured with 6–9 months of anti-TB treatment under directly observed treatment short course.
Tuberculosis (TB) caused an estimated 1.3 million deaths worldwide in 2016 (WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, 2017). The major challenge in the treatment of tuberculosis is the emergence of drugresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Gygli et al., (2017) The drugs available for tuberculosis treatment are categorised into first-line (isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethambutol (EMB) and streptomycin (STR)) and second line (including fluoroquinolones, thioamides, cycloserine and the injectable aminoglycosides). Rising rates of multi-drug- resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB, defined as resistance to INH and RIF), are of immense concern for TB control worldwide. Extended treatment is required with multiple drugs that have a higher rate of side effects but limited rate of treatment success (Gygli et al. 2017). India accounts for the highest burden of tuberculosis globally and also ranks top among the countries for MDR-TB cases (WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, 2017).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Methodology Adopted:-
Patient Recruitment and Sample Collection: Sputum for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture were collected from the index cases (IC) and household contacts (HC) during a contact investigation study on sputum smear-positive TB patients seen at the DOTS-PLUS Centre, Department of Respiratory Medicine King George’s Medical University, Lucknow.
A total of Hundred Index patients, sputum smearpositive, with MDR-TB, were identified as per standard diagnostic criteria. Five hundred six (506) of their household contacts were evaluated for TB with tuberculin skin test (TST), chest x-ray and sputum examination.
Ninety two (18.1%) household contacts were identified positive by tuberculin skin test (TST).
Staining: Ziehl and Nelson method of staining were performed for all Samples.
Result: Out of 100 Index - 56 are 2+ or 3+ positive, 44 are 1+ or scanty.
A total of Seventy one (14%) household contacts with TB were identified positive by chest x-rays and/or positive sputum results; of these, 15 were sputum culture-positive.
Sample Processing: Sample processing was done within 24 hours by N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC) method.
Culture: Culture was done for 100 Index and 428 household contacts, sputum samples in liquid culture medium- Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tubes (MGIT).
Result: A total of 98 Index Sputum samples and 15 household contacts shown positive culture growth in liquid culture medium.
DNA Isolation: DNA isolation done for 27 samples (12 index cases and 15 household contacts).
A total of 27 M. tuberculosis paired isolates were available from 12 index patients (IC) and 15 household contacts (HC) .
Collection of Patients Sample
Demographic and clinical data were gathered using data collection forms from the provincial laboratories on the basis of national TB codes, and the data were verified at the National TB Registry. The data collection was strictly anonymous and no patient identifiers were used throughout the collection and analysis period. The study has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Research Affairs at Department of Respiratory Medicine King George’s Medical University, Lucknow.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Drug susceptibility testing:
Only two of the 27 isolates were fully susceptible to all first line drugs; nine were resistant to all first line drugs.
Isoniazid (INH) resistance was detected in 25/27 and 19/21 at low (0.2 μg/ml) and high (1.0 μg/ml) concentrations, respectively.
Table 1. Demographic for Index case (IC): A detailed history with other social details of Index patients (100) is collected
Variables |
Factors |
Frequency (n=100) |
(%) |
Sex |
Male |
67 |
67 |
Female |
33 |
33 |
|
Age |
≤ 40 |
58 |
58 |
> 40 |
42 |
42 |
|
Residence |
Urban |
54 |
54 |
Rural |
46 |
46 |
|
Personal habit |
Alcoholic |
17 |
17 |
Non-alcoholic |
83 |
83 |
|
Smoker |
27 |
27 |
|
Ex-smoker |
4 |
4 |
|
Non-smoker |
69 |
69 |
|
Contact history |
Present |
7 |
7 |
Past |
9 |
9 |
|
Absent |
84 |
84 |
|
Smear Grading |
3+ or 2+ |
54 |
54 |
1+ or scanty |
46 |
46 |
|
Culture Result |
Positive |
98 |
98 |
Negative |
2 |
2 |
Table 2. Demographic for household contact (HC): A detailed history with other social details of household contacts (506) is collected.
Variables |
Factors |
Frequency (n=506) |
(%) |
Sex |
Male |
342 |
67.6 |
Female |
164 |
32.4 |
|
Age |
≤ 40 |
318 |
62.8 |
> 40 |
188 |
37.2 |
|
Residence |
Urban |
356 |
70.4 |
Rural |
150 |
29.6 |
|
Personal habit |
Alcoholic |
54 |
10.7 |
Non alcoholic |
401 |
89.3 |
|
Smoker |
94 |
18.5 |
|
Ex-smoker |
37 |
7.31 |
|
Non-smoker |
375 |
74.1 |
|
Smear Grading |
3+ or 2+ |
(n=15) 11 |
73.3 |
1+ or scanty |
4 |
26.7 |
|
Culture Result |
Positive |
(n=428) 15 |
3.50 |
Negative |
413 |
96.5 |
Table 3. Drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from index cases (IC) and household contact (HC)
cases
Household/index contact |
First line drugs |
Second line drugs |
||||||||||
INH 0.2 1.0 |
RIF 1.0 |
EMB 7.5 |
STR 2.0 10 |
CAP 10 |
KAN 6.0 |
AMI 6.0 |
ETH 10 |
CYC 60.0 |
PAS 8.0 |
|||
IC1 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC1 |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC2 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC2 |
R |
R |
R |
S |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC3 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC3.1 |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC3.2 |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC4 |
R |
R |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
HC4 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC5 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC5 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC6 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
HC6.1 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
HC6.2 |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC7 |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
HC7 |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC8 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC8.1 |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC8.2 |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC9 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC9 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC10 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC10 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC11 |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC11 |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
IC12 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
HC12 |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Table 4. Patient demographic
Index Patient/House hold contacts |
Year diagnosed with tuberculosis |
Years between diagnosis |
Age of diagnosis |
Sex |
Relationship |
DST matches? (Y/N) |
IC1 |
2015 |
41 |
F |
|||
HC1 |
2015 |
0 |
22 |
F |
Child |
No |
IC2 |
2015 |
28 |
M |
|||
HC2 |
2015 |
0 |
18 |
M |
Sibling |
No |
IC3 |
2015 |
52 |
M |
|||
HC3.1 |
2015 |
0 |
22 |
F |
Child |
No |
HC3.2 |
2015 |
0 |
17 |
M |
Sibling |
No |
IC4 |
2016 |
38 |
M |
|||
HC4 |
2016 |
0 |
10 |
M |
Child |
No |
IC5 |
2016 |
42 |
M |
|||
HC5 |
2016 |
0 |
22 |
M |
Child |
Yes |
IC6 |
2016 |
17 |
M |
|||
HC6.1 |
2016 |
0 |
20 |
M |
Sibling |
Yes |
HC6.2 |
2016 |
0 |
29 |
M |
Sibling |
No |
IC7 |
2016 |
43 |
M |
|||
HC7 |
2017 |
1 |
33 |
F |
Sibling |
Yes |
IC8 |
2016 |
28 |
F |
|||
HC8.1 |
2017 |
.3 |
60 |
M |
Parent |
No |
HC8.2 |
2017 |
NA |
41 |
M |
Sibling |
No |
IC9 |
2017 |
19 |
M |
|||
HC9 |
2017 |
0 |
30 |
M |
Sibling |
Yes |
IC10 |
2017 |
40 |
M |
|||
HC10 |
2017 |
0 |
40 |
F |
Sibling |
Yes |
IC11 |
2017 |
41 |
M |
|||
HC11 |
2017 |
0 |
12 |
M |
Child |
No |
IC12 |
2017 |
30 |
F |
|||
HC12 |
2017 |
0 |
28 |
F |
Sibling |
No |
Resistance to rifampin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB) occurred in 19/27, 14/27, respectively.
With second line drugs, resistance to streptomycin (STR) at 2.0 μg/ml, streptomycin at 10 μg/ml, and ethionamide (ETH) was detected in 14/27, 10/27, 5/27 respectively.
Note:
Susceptibilities are reported in μg/ml.
Abbreviations: INH – isoniazid, RIF – rifampin, EMB – ethambutol, PZA – pyrazinamide, STR – streptomycin, CAP – capreomycin, KAN – kanamycin, AMI – amikacin, ETH – ethionamide, CYC – cycloserine, PAS – paraaminosalicylic acid; R – resistant, S – susceptible.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
Список литературы Genetic profiling and drug-resistance pattern of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients and their household contacts in north Indian population
- Gygli S.M., Borrell S., Trauner A., Gagneux S. (2017) Antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(3), 354-373,.
- DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fux011 EDN: YHDJRS
- World Health Organization. (2017). Global tuberculosis report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization. 249 p. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259366.