Civil liability under related agreements in banking

The author examines the problems that arise when using related agreements in banking. Proves that the reason for concluding such agreements is the bank’s high interest in receiving income for additional services provided by third parties. Notes that recognition of the relatedness of contracts is of great importance for increasing civil liability for dishonest behavior of banks and the introduction of non-contractual liability for banks for offenses committed by a third party working under a related contract, which has a positive impact on consumers.