ICT in Higher Education: Wiki-based Reflection to Promote Deeper Thinking Levels
Автор: Akinul Islam Jony, Md. Sadekur Rahman, Yousuf Mahbubul Islam
Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) @ijmecs
Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.9, 2017 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The main purpose of higher education is to produce skilled graduates so that they can think critically and solve real world problems. Presenting a group based solution in a face-to-face class is a common activity in the higher education classroom where other students/peers can actively participate in the follow-up question/answer sessions. Working out a solution together as a group engages students’ independent thinking ability and promotes active learning. This means, that they have the opportunity to reflect on their own thinking and take it to deeper levels of thinking. However, recent trends show that online support to the higher education class - a form of blended learning is growing day by day. This paper proposes a wiki-based (one of the ICT tools) reflection method to follow up regular existing face-to-face classroom presentation activities to promote deeper thinking levels of students in higher education. In this article, Lee’s Model of thinking levels is-used for analyzing the thinking levels of students during their wiki work. The findings of this research work (through experiments) show that the wiki-based reflection method could be an effective way to promote thinking levels of students and hence can be used as a blended learning model to promote reflective and in-depth thinking.
Online Learning, E-learning, Technology Enhanced Learning, Higher Education, Blended Learning, Thinking Levels
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15014961
IDR: 15014961
Текст научной статьи ICT in Higher Education: Wiki-based Reflection to Promote Deeper Thinking Levels
Published Online April 2017 in MECS DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2017.04.05
Class presentation is a popular activity in higher education where students can be actively involved in the follow-up question/answer (Q/A) session. Traditionally, the question pattern in higher education uses common verbs like describe, list, define, or state something based on a specific topic, where they do not need to engage their thinking, except memorize the knowledge and echo (recall) the same knowledge, i.e., involve lower order thinking (LOT, Bloom’s Taxonomy). In some cases, they have been asked to explain or calculate something where they need to rationalize their thinking with the knowledge. The purpose of higher education is to produce skilled graduates, who could become real world problem solvers, critical thinkers or have the ability of think critically. Hence, to accomplish this purpose higher education institutes need to encourage students to reflect on their own thinking. In this regard, classroom group presentations that require a solution to a real problem would be helpful to engage students and promote active learning.
A key element of classroom or face-to-face learning is the social and communicative interactions between student and teacher, and student and student. The fundamental learning activities of a student is to ask a question, to share an opinion, or to disagree with a point of view, which are usually carried out through conversation, discussion, and debate among students and/or between teachers and students. Eventually, a learning objective is achieved by performing these face-to-face classroom learning activities. Thus, online learning requires amendments by teachers as well as students for successful interactions to occur towards reflective learning. Generally online education/learning substitutes classroom face-to-face interaction with discussion boards, blogs, wiki, synchronous chat, electronic bulletin boards, and e-mails. Some scholars suggest that interaction in an online learning environment promotes student-centered learning, encourages wider student participation, and produces more in-depth and reasoned discussions than a conventional face-to-face classroom setting does [12, 25]. Learning or acquisition of knowledge and thinking are interrelated lifelong processes [5]. So, one must learn how to refine and adjust one’s thinking and reflects his or her own thinking beyond the knowledge to add depth and substance to his or her own knowledge. By continuous practice with time, one can get higher at making more thoughtful observations and judgments and can apprehend how values are reflected in thinking and behaving [29]. Thus, if it is possible to nurture the learning and thinking processes, it will continue for a lifetime.
In addition, online involvement rates in education (a form of blended learning) are growing at much faster rates than the traditional classroom or face-to-face learning; specifically, in higher education in all over the world. Hence, the research question of this paper is outlined as “Is it possible to promote thinking levels using ICT tools?”, that means, can additional questions on class work or class presentations given in a web based ICT tool scaffold to help students move into higher levels of thinking? To address this issue, wiki is chosen as an ICT tool for higher education where students participate virtually to post their Q/A based on a poster presentation. Finally, to outline the findings of this research work, the popular Lee’s Model [13] of thinking levels is used to analyze the student’s data set collected from the wikibased poster presentations.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: in section 2, related works have been stated. Section 3 describes the research methodology applied in this paper. Section 4 illustrates the findings of this research work by analyzing the results from the experiment. Finally, section 5 concludes the paper.
-
II. Related Works
Philosophy of learning based on reflection begins from everyday experience at a higher education institution. Reflection of thinking can help students to strengthen learning and professional efficiency which eventually helps them to think beyond the knowledge. Hence, reflection of thinking activates learning, self-analysis, as well as solution of real world problems. So, the learning in higher education needs to emphasize on this goal, i.e. to produce critical thinker.
Список литературы ICT in Higher Education: Wiki-based Reflection to Promote Deeper Thinking Levels
- H. S. Barrows, “Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview”, in New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 68, pp. 3-12, 1996.
- D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D. Walker, “Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning”, London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2005.
- A. Brockbank and I. McGill, “Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education”. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University, 1998.
- J. Calderhead and P. Gates, “Conceptualizing in Teacher Development”, London, Washington, D. C.: The Falmer Press, 1993.
- J. Chaffee, “Thinking critically” (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
- B. J. Duch, “Writing problems for deeper understanding”, in B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning, pp. 47-53. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2001.
- S. A. Gallagher, “Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going?” in Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 20(4), pp. 332-362. 1997.
- Blended Learning 101: Handbook, Url: http://learningaccelerator.org/media/3d90f736/Blended_Learning_Handbook_6713_Final.pdf. Aspire Publication School. Last accessed: 6 September 2016.
- C. E. Hmelo and M. Ferrari, M., “The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher order thinking skills”, in Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 20(4), pp. 401-422, 1997.
- Judy Thompson, “Blended Learning - It’s What’s Up For Successful Students”, 1996, Url: https://elearningindustry.com/6-blended-learning-models-blended-learning-successful-students, Last accessed: 6 September 2016.
- D. W. Johnson, D. and F. P. Johnson, “Joining together: Group theory and group skills”, Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon, 2002.
- S. Karayan and J. Crowe, “Student perspectives of electronic discussion groups”, in THE Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, vol. 24(9), pp. 69–71, 1997.
- Lee, “Lee’s Model of thinking level”, 2000.
- J. Loughran, “Developing Reflective Practice: Learning about Teaching and Learning Through Modelling. London”, Falmer Press, 1996.
- J.A. Moon, J. A., “Reflection in Learning and Professional Development”, Theory and Practice, London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 1999.
- K. F. Osterman and R. B., Kottkamp, “Reflective Practice for Educators”, Professional Development to Improve Student Learning, California: Corwin Press, 2004.
- M. Oliver, M. and K. Trigwell, “Can 'blended learning' be redeemed?”, in E-Learning. Vol. 2 (1), pp. 17-26, 2005.
- A. Pincas, G. Saunders, and G. Hughes, “FINAL REPORT: Effective use of learning technologies (ICT) with campus-based students”, Institute of Education, University of London, 2003.
- B. Rosenshine, “Recent research on teaching behaviors and student achievement”, in Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 27(1), pp. 61-64, 1976.
- J. Rossbottom, “Hybrid Learning - a safe route into web based open and distance learning for the computer science teacher”, in Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Canterbury, United Kingdom, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
- G. Salmon, “Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions ALT-J”, in Research in Learning Technology, vol. 13 (3), pp. 201-218, 2005.
- D. Schön, “The Reflective Practitionier”, How professionals think in action. Great Britain, London: Maurice Temple Smith Ltd, 1991.
- D. Schuman, “Direct Instruction: A Review of Research”, Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Watson School of Education, 1998, Retrieved fromhttp://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/shumanthesisdi.html.
- Rhona Sharpe, Greg Benfield, George Roberts and Richard Francis, “The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice”, in Higher Education Academy, 2006.
- D. Smith and G. Hardaker, “e-Learning innovation through the implementation of an Internet supported learning environment. Educational Technology and Society, vol. 3, pp. 1–16, 2000.
- Heather Staker and Michael B. Horn, “Classifying K–12 Blended learning”, INNOSIGHT INSTITUTE, 2012.
- J. C. Sweeney and D. Ingram, “A comparison of traditional and web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study”, in Journal of Marketing Education vol. 23(1), pp. 55-62, 2001.
- P. Woodworth and A. A. G., "A hybrid structure for the introductory computers and information technology course," in Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 22(3), pp. 136- 144, 2007.
- B. Yıldırım and S. Özkahraman, “Critical Thinking in Nursing and Learning Styles”, in International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 1(18), pp. 127-133, 2011.