Impact of the digitalization of employment on the work-family balance: Russians’ subjective assessments
Автор: Kamarova T.A., Markova T.L., Tonkikh N.V.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Social and economic development
Статья в выпуске: 6 т.16, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The development of digital technology causes rapid transformation in the sphere of work and the emergence of new forms and formats of employment. The ongoing changes bring to the fore the issue of work-family balance, because it is necessary to promote the well-being of employees with children. The aim of our research is to study the impact of the digitalization of employment on the work-children balance. The empirical base includes findings of a survey of working age women and men, with work experience, living in the territory of the Russian Federation, and raising children under the age of 14 (N = 954); the survey was conducted in May - June 2023. Based on the data obtained, we reveal differences in satisfaction ratings among respondents who intensively use information and communication technologies and do not intensively use/do not use them in their work; the latter have a higher average satisfaction rate concerning the time spent on parental responsibilities. This indicates the ambiguous impact of information and communication technologies on the satisfaction rate regarding the time spent on parenthood. Second, there is no direct relationship between the amount of time parents spend with their children and subjective satisfaction with the time spent on parenthood; this is in line with the results of other studies. Third, we reveal a contradiction between a high assessment of the expected positive effect of a hybrid work format on the time spent on children and low satisfaction regarding the time spent on children in women that work under a hybrid employment scheme. The revealed contradiction indicates difficulties in the practical implementation of this work format, which significantly reduce women’s satisfaction regarding the time spent on parenthood. The determinants of this effect require further verification with the use of qualitative techniques.
Parenthood, time spent on children, family-work balance, employment, satisfaction, parental well-being
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147242470
IDR: 147242470 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.15
Текст научной статьи Impact of the digitalization of employment on the work-family balance: Russians’ subjective assessments
The research was supported by Russian Science Foundation grant 22-18-00614, project/22-18-00614/
Satisfaction concerning the time spent on parenthood is one of the determinants of parental well-being and reproductive behavior. The Concept of State Family Policy for the period up to 20251 reflects the idea that it is necessary and appropriate to create real conditions for combining family responsibilities with professional activities, including through the development of employment forms that promote a harmonious balance of parental and labor obligations.
The implementation of family policy to harmonize the family-work balance can contribute to the growth of fertility rates and positively affect the economic efficiency of labor relations. Satisfaction regarding the work-family balance increases labor satisfaction (Nilawati et al., 2019) and removes barriers to productivity growth (Belekhova, Ivanovskaya, 2022).
Digitalization has become a catalyst for spreading flexible employment formats (remote, hybrid, platform, self-employment), which, according to some estimates, makes it possible to combine employment with family responsibilities more successfully (Abramov, Bykov, 2021).
However, experts’ opinions on the digitalization impact on employment are ambiguous. On the one hand, the large-scale introduction of technologies opens up limitless opportunities for professional selfactualization, career and personal growth, improving well-being and quality of life (Ganju et al., 2016; Zelenkov, Lashkevich, 2020), job creation, etc.2. Digital technologies contribute to changing the working time structure (Pobiyanskaya et al., 2022), it becomes flexible and can be transformed depending on the desire of an employer and employee3. In the digital economy, there are opportunities to both reduce the duration of working time and extend it beyond the standard norm of working hours (Demina, Zayakina, 2020), conditions are created for poly-employment, which often allows not only obtaining additional financial income and stability, but also it helps to unlock employee’s professional potential, increases their stability and confidence in the future (Kuchenkova, 2019).
On the other hand, researchers agree that digitalization contributes to growing work intensity and working hours. According to the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, about a third of the country’s population (35%) have a working day longer than 9 hours4. The increase in the working day length is due to a number of reasons, including underemployment at the main workplace, low wages, rising inflation and declining real incomes, and labor market instability, which encourages workers to seek additional employment opportunities in their free time from the main job (Demina, Zayakina, 2020; Kuchenkova, 2019). We are witnessing such a phenomenon as overemployment (working week is over the standard 40 hours), which carries negative risks and consequences for the work-family balance.
The problem of the work-life balance for working parents with preschool and school-age children is particularly relevant. There is a need for a deeper study of the benefits and risks of modern trends in employment for working parents in terms of planning the birth of children, the quantity and quality of time for their upbringing, and satisfaction with time spent on children. According to the researchers’ estimates (Kalabikhina, 2019), digitalization has a positive impact on demographic trends, at the same time, there are concerns that the reproductive attitudes of citizens may conflict with the lifestyle and consumer opportunities within the digital economy. In this regard, special attention is paid to creating the necessary conditions in society for giving birth and raising children, popularizing the values of parenthood and childhood, and harmonizing working hours to improve the workfamily balance (Shabunova, Leonidova, 2023).
At this stage, there is no deep understanding of how transformations in employment, in particular digital, flexible and hybrid forms of modern work organization, affect the work-family balance. In the Russian scientific literature, studies, aimed at examining the specifics of satisfaction with the time costs of parenthood among people of different types and modes of employment, are fragmentary. We aspire to fill the existing lacunas in this direction. Our hypothesis is based on the assumption that there is a relationship between the penetration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in employment and satisfaction with time spent on parenthood. The employment digitalization is reflected not only in an increase in the intensity of ICT use in work, but also in changes in work mode (flexible/hard), job format (remote/hybrid/stationary), and sectoral conditions of employment.
The object of the research is working-age women and men, with work experience, living in the Russian Federation and raising children under the age of 14.
The aim of the study is to examine the impact of employment digitalization on the work-child balance.
The key task is to assess the degree of satisfaction with time spent on parenthood depending on the following employment parameters: intensity of the ICT use in work; flexibility of work mode; workplace format (remote, hybrid, stationary); industry. In addition, we study the relationship of satisfaction concerning the time spent on parenthood with actual time spent on children and the age of children.
Subjective assessments of satisfaction regarding the time spent on parenting will reveal how successful working parents are at balancing work and time with children.
Список литературы Impact of the digitalization of employment on the work-family balance: Russians’ subjective assessments
- Abramov R.N., Bykov A.V. (2021). The world of professions in the context of work and employment: Pandemic and digital vertigo. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 3(163), 4–20. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.3.2001 (in Russian).
- Bagirova A.P., Blednova N.D. (2021). Combination of professional and parental labor in assessments of Ural women: Objective and subjective barriers. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=Woman in Russian Society, S, 150–167. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2021.0.10 (in Russian).
- Bagirova A.P., Shubat O.M. (2011). Conceptual approaches to analyzing the quality of parental labor. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika, 31, 2–6 (in Russian).
- Baxter J., Gray M., Alexander M. et al. (2007). Mothers and Fathers with Young Children: Paid Employment, Caring and Wellbeing. Canberra: Dept. of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
- Belekhova G.V., Ivanovskaya A.L. (2022). Satisfaction with the work-life balance: Working women’s view (regional aspect). Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 209–222. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.11 (in Russian).
- Cooklin A.R., Giallo R., Strazdins L. et al. (2015). What matters for working fathers? Job characteristics, work-family conflict and enrichment, and fathers’ postpartum mental health in an Australian cohort. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 214–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.028
- Demina V.V., Zayakina I.A. (2020). Extra employment as a characteristic of labor activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economics, 1, 8–18. DOI: 10.18384/2310-6646-2020-1-8-18 (in Russian).
- Ganju K.K., Pavlou P.A., Banker R.D. (2016). Does information and communication technology lead to the well-being of nations? A country-level empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 417–430. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.07
- Gatrell C.J., Burnett S.B., Cooper C.L., Sparrow P. (2014). Parents, perceptions and belonging: Exploring flexible working among UK fathers and mothers. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 473–487. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12050
- Greenhaus J., Collins K., Shaw J. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
- Gutiérrez-Domènech M. (2010). Parental employment and time with children in Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 8, 371–391. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-010-9096-z
- Hallberg D., Klevmarken A. (2003). Time for children: A study of parent’s time allocation. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 205–226. DOI: 10.1007/s001480200133
- Ichino A., De Galdeano A. S. (2004). Reconciling motherhood and work: Evidence from time-use data in three countries. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 271, 263–288. DOI: 10.1016/S0573-8555(04)71010-X
- Kalabikhina I.E. (2019). Demographic reflections on the digital economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika=Moscow University Economic Bulletin, 6, 147–166 (in Russian).
- Korolenko A.V. (2021). The time resource of the modern family: The experience of studying on the example of the Vologda Oblast. Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Pravo, 4(24), 107–118 (in Russian).
- Korolenko A.V., Kalachikova O.N. (2019). “Time for children”: Modern parents’ resource opportunities. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 5, 1–15. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.5.22.1 (in Russian).
- Kuchenkova A.V. (2019). Secondary employment in the context of precarization on the Russian labor market. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 45(9), 73–83. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006659-7 (in Russian).
- Kutrovátz K. (2017). Parental time from the perspective of time pressure: The idea of intensive parenting. Szociológiai Szemle, 27(4), 20–39.
- Meier A., Musick K., Flood S., Dunifon R. (2016). Mothering experiences: How single parenthood and employment structure the emotional valence of parenting. Demography, 53(3), 649–674. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-016-0474-x
- Milkie M.A., Mattingly M.J., Nomaguchi K.M. et al. (2004). The time squeeze: Parental statuses and feelings about time with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 739–761. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00050.x
- Monna B., Gauthier A.H. (2008). A review of the literature on the social and economic determinants of parental time. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 634–653. DOI: 10.1007/s10834-008-9121-z
- Neilson J., Stanfors M. (2014). It’s about time! Gender, parenthood, and household divisions of labor under different welfare regimes. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1066–1088. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X14522240
- Nilawati F., Umar N., Kusdi R., Zainul А. (2019). The influence of work-life balance and organizational pride on job satisfaction and its impact on organizational citizenship behavior in five and four star hotels employee. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 97(7), 191–196. DOI 10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.20
- Nomaguchi K.M., Milkie M.A., Bianchi S.M. (2005). Time strains and psychological well-being: Do dual-earner mothers and fathers differ? Journal of Family Issues, 26, 756–792. DOI:10.1177/ 0192513X05277524
- Noonan M., Estes S.B., Glass J. (2007). Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 263–288. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X06292703
- Pobiyanskaya A.V., Kipervar E.A., Stuken T.Yu. (2022). Working hours structure in terms of duration. Ekonomika truda, 9(8), 1325–1338. DOI: 10.18334/et.9.8.114832 (in Russian).
- Pollmann-Schult M., Li J. (2020). Introduction to the special issue “Parental work and family/child well-being. Journal of Family Research, 32(2), 177–191. DOI: 10.20377/jfr-422
- Rapoport B., Le Bourdais C. (2008). Parental time and working schedules. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 903–932. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-007-0147-6
- Razumova T.O., Serpukhova M.A. (2022). Theoretical and methodological foundations for the formation of the work-life balance indicator. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 18(4), 466–476. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.4 (in Russian).
- Shabunova A.A., Leonidova G.V. (2023). Work-family balance: Assessments of successful working parents. Narodonaselenie=Population, 26(1), 123–134. DOI: 10.19181/population.2023.26.1.10 (in Russian).
- Tonkikh N.V., Chernykh E.A. (2022). The quality of work, family and personal life during remote work: Opinions of Russian women. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 18(4), 477–490. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.5 (in Russian).
- Yang D., Kelly E.L., Kubzansky L.D., Berkman L. (2023). Working from home and worker well-being: New evidence from Germany. ILR Review, 76(3), 504–531. DOI: 10.1177/00197939221148716
- Zannella M. et al. (2020). Gender differences in the subjective perception of parenting time. RIEDS-Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica-The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, 74(2), 49–60.
- Zelenkov Yu.A., Lashkevich E.V. (2020). Fuzzy regression model of the impact of technology on living standards. Biznes-informatika=Business Informatics, 14(3), 67–81. DOI: 10.17323/2587-814X.2020.3.67.81 (in Russian).