Implications of precarization in the context of generational groups: direct and indirect effects

Автор: Popov Andrei V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Scientific reviews

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The effects of employment precarization are the subject of active discussion in the scientific literature. Despite the novelty of the topic, the negative impact of this process on the labor and daily life has been subject of a large number of works over the previous decade. At the same time, age specifics have not been widely reflected in studies: as a rule, authors focus on the population as a whole or its individual categories, for example, youth. The purpose of the article is to analyze and generalize the existing experience of studying the impact of employment precarization on generational groups of the economically active population. For this purpose, we have examined the situation of young, middle-aged and older workers involved in unstable labor relations. The information base is the Russian and foreign sources of empirical orientation; in the work we have used general scientific methods. The results show that the impact of employment precarization on generational groups has serious specifics. For young people, job instability mainly affects the planning of their own future forcing them to postpone the issues of starting a family and having children, leaving the parental home, etc. Prolonged transition to stable employment harms mental health, which is most pronounced in adulthood, when instability becomes part of everyday life. It can be difficult to get out of the “precarity trap” because low earnings and social insecurity limit the ability to change the current situation. The effects of employment precarization for older people are ambiguous. Even taking into account all the disadvantages of unstable labor relations, having at least some work is often a necessity to maintain a habitual lifestyle. The main limitation of the research is the generalization of information obtained using various conceptual constructions and methodological tools.

Еще

Precarization, precarious employment, generational groups, labor market, non-standard employment, standard of living, youth, middle generation, elderly people

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147239130

IDR: 147239130   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.6.84.10

Список литературы Implications of precarization in the context of generational groups: direct and indirect effects

  • Aisa R., Pueyo F., Sanso M. (2012). Life expectancy and labor supply of the elderly. Journal of Population Economics, 25(2), 545–568.
  • Alvarez C.V., Potes M.P.E., Merchan M.E.P. (2016). Quality of life and informal labor among elderly persons in an intermediate Colombian city, 2012–2013. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, 19(3), 415–427.
  • Benavides F.G., Benach J., Diez-Roux A.V., Roman C. (2000). How do types of employment relate to health indicators? Findings from the Second European Survey on Working Conditions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54, 494–501.
  • Bobkov V.N (Ed.). (2018). Neustoichivaya zanyatost’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: teoriya i metodologiya vyyavleniya, otsenivanie i vektor sokrashcheniya: monografiya [Unstable Employment in the Russian Federation: Theory and Methodology of Identification, Assessment and Vector of Reduction: Monograph]. Moscow: KNORUS.
  • Bobkov V.N., Chernykh E.A. (2014). The influence of youth employment precarity on labour market transitions. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 3(193), 23–55 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Kvachev V.G., Novikova I.V. (2018). Precarious employment in the regions of Russian Federation: Sociological survey results. Ekonomika region=Economy of Region, 14(2), 366–379 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Litvinyuk A.A. (Eds.). (2016). Rossiiskaya molodezh’ na rynke truda: ekonomicheskaya aktivnost’ i problemy trudoustroistva v megapolise [Russian Youth in the Labor Market: Economic Activity and Employment Problems in the Metropolis]. Moscow: RUSAINS.
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V. (2021). The material well-being of Russians: Intergenerational differentiation. Mir novoi ekonomiki=The World of New Economy, 15(2), 16–28. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-2-16-28 (in Russian).
  • Bohle P., Quinlan M., Kennedy D., Williamson A. (2004). Working hours, work-life conflict and health in precarious and “permanent” employment. Revista de saude publica, 38, 19–25. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000700004
  • Bone K.D. (2019). “I don’t want to be a vagrant for the rest of my life”: Young peoples’ experiences of precarious work as a “continuous present”. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(9), 1218–1237. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1570097
  • Burrows S. (2013). Precarious work, neoliberalism and young people’s experiences of employment in the Illawarra region. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3), 380–396. DOI: 10.1177/1035304613498189
  • Casey B. (2005). The employment of older people: Can we learn from Japan? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 30, 620–637. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510051
  • Castells М. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul‘tura [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Moscow: GU VShE.
  • Chan S., Tweedie D. (2015). Precarious work and reproductive insecurity. Social Alternatives, 34(4), 8–13.
  • Chernykh N.A., Tarasova A.N., Syrchin A.E. (2020). Persons of pre-retirement age in the labour market: Employment problems and support measures. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 16(4), 1178–1192. DOI: 10.17059/ ekon.reg.2020-4-12 (in Russian).
  • Cranford C.J., Vosko L.F., Zukewich N. (2003). Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: A statistical portrait. Just Labour, 3, 6–22. DOI: 10.25071/1705-1436.164
  • D’Amours M. (2009). Non-standard employment after age 50: How precarious is it? Relations industrielles, 642, 209–229.
  • Eckelt M., Schmidt G. (2014). Learning to be precarious – the transition of young people from school into precarious work in Germany. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 12(3), 130–155.
  • Ferrie J.E., Shipley M., Stansfeld S., Marmot M. (2002). Effects of chronic job insecurity and change in job security on self-reported health, minor psychiatric morbidity, physiological measures, and health related behaviours in British civil servants: The Whitehall 2nd study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(6), 450–454. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.6.450
  • Gash V. (2008). Bridge or trap? Temporary workers’ transitions to unemployment and to the standard employment contract. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 651–668. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcn027
  • Gimpelson V.E., Kapeliushnikov R.I. (2005). Nestandartnaya zanyatost’ i rossiiskii rynok truda [Non-Standard Employment and the Russian Labor Market]. Moscow: GU VShE.
  • Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. (2013). New social groups in modern stratification systems of global society. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika=Social Science and Social Practice, 3(3), 5–15 (in Russian).
  • Hanappi D., Ryser V.-A., Bernardi L., Le Goff J.-M. (2012). Precarious work and the fertility intention-behavior link: An analysis based on the Swiss household panel data. Working paper of LIVES National Center of Competence in Research, 17, 1–27. DOI: 10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2012.17
  • Ivanova M.A. (2019). The demand for older workers and age discrimination: International experience and Russian realities. Voprosy ekonomiki, 6, 99–121. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-6-99-121 (in Russian).
  • Jetha A., Martin Ginis K.A., Ibrahim S., Cignac M.A.M. (2020). The working disadvantaged: The role of age, job tenure and disability in precarious work. BMC Public Health, 20. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09938-1
  • Kapsalis C., Tourigny P. (2005). Duration of non-standard employment. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 17(1), 31–39.
  • Kim I.-H., Khang Y.-H., Muntaner C. et al. (2008). Gender, precarious work, and chronic diseases in South Korea. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51, 748–757. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20626
  • Kipervar E.A., Pobiyanskaya A.V., Dubrovin A.M. (2022). Labour mobility of the elderly population. Ekonomika truda=Russian Journal of Labor Economics, 9(1), 149–160. DOI: 10.18334/et.9.1.113982 (in Russian).
  • Kozina I.M., Zangieva I.K. (2018). State and market regulation of labour activity of old-age pensioners. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 16(1), 7–22. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2018-16-1-7-22 (in Russian).
  • Kuchenkova A.V. (2022). Employment precarization and subjective well-being of employees in different age groups. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 28(1), 101–120. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8840 (in Russian).
  • Lain D., Airey L., Loretto W., Vickerstaff S. (2019). Understanding older worker precarity: The intersecting domains of jobs, households and the welfare state. Ageing and Society, 39(10), 2219–2241. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X18001253
  • Lancker W.V. (2012). The European world of temporary employment. European Societies, 14(1), 83–111. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2011.638082
  • Lewchuk W. (2017). Precarious jobs: Where are they, and how do they affect well-being? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 402–419. DOI: 10.1177/1035304617722943
  • Makovskaya N.V. (2020). Gender employment precarization in Belarus. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research, 3(40), 44–55. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2020-40-3-44-55 (in Russian).
  • Miguel Carmo R., Cantante F., de Almeida Alves N. (2014). Time projections: Youth and precarious employment. Time & Society, 23(3), 337–357. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X14549505
  • Odegov Yu.G., Babynina L.S. (2018). Precarious employment as a possible factor behind the use of youth labor force potential. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 386–409. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.20 (in Russian).
  • Pailhe A., Solaz A. (2012). The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect? Demographic Research, 26, 1–40. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.1
  • Papadakis N., Drakaki M., Saridaki S., Dafermos V. (2021). Into the vicious cycle of precarity: Labour market, precarious work, social vulnerability and youth: The case of Greece within the EU context. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(12), 474–496. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.712.9511
  • Piotrowski M., Kalleberg A.L., Rindfuss R.R. (2015). Contingent work rising: Implications for the timing of marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 77, 1039–1056. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12224
  • Popov A.V., Solov’eva T.S. (2019). Analyzing and classifying the implications of employment precarization: Individual, organizational and social levels. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz =Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(6), 182–196. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.10 (in Russian).
  • Reddy A.B. (2016). Labour force participation of elderly in India: Patterns and determinants. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(5), 502–516. DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-11-2014-0221
  • Robert P., Oross D., Szabo A. (2017). Youth, precarious employment and political participation in Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 3(1), 120–146. DOI: 10.17356/ieejsp.v3i1.299
  • Sahoo B., Neog B.G. (2015). Heterogeneity and participation in informal employment among non-cultivator workers in India. MPRA Paper, 68136, 1–57.
  • Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskii V.V., Gasyukova E.N. (2015). Precariat: Theory and empirical analysis (polls in Russia, 1994–2013 data). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 12(380), 99–110 (in Russian).
  • Sršen A., Dizdarevič S. (2014). Precariousness among young people and student population in the Czech Republic. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(21), 161–168.
  • Standing G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Steele E.J., Giles L.C., Davies M.J., Moore V.M. (2014). Is precarious employment associated with women remaining childless until age 35 years? Results from an Australian birth cohort study. Human Reproduction, 29(1), 155–160. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det407
  • Stuth S., Jahn K. (2020) Young, successful, precarious? Precariousness at the entry stage of employment careers in Germany. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(6), 702–725. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636945
  • Tartakovskaya I.N., Vanke A.V. (2019). Mobility strategies of precarious employees and the formation of precarious habitus. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 25(2), 99–115. DOI: 10.19181/ socjour.2019.25.2.6388 (in Russian).
  • Toshchenko Zh. T. (2020). Prekariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa [Precarial: The Emergence of a New Class]. Moscow: Tsentr sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga.
  • Umicevic A., Arzenšek A., Franca V. (2021). Precarious Work and Mental Health among Young Adults: A Vicious Circle? Managing Global Transitions, 19(3), 227–247. DOI: 10.26493/1854-6935.19.227-247
  • Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V. (2020). Employment insecurity and behavioral preferences of university graduates. Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(4), 112–125. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.4.112-125 (in Russian).
  • Wahrendorf M., Akinwale B., Landy R. et al. (2016). Who in Europe works beyond the state pension age and under which conditions? Results from SHARE. Population Aging, 10, 269–285. DOI: 10.1007/s12062-016-9160-4
Еще
Статья научная