In-vitro response of Vigna aconitifolia to drought stress induced by PEG - 6000
Автор: Soni Priyanka, Rizwan M., Bhatt K.V., Mohapatra T., Singh Govind
Журнал: Журнал стресс-физиологии и биохимии @jspb
Статья в выпуске: 3 т.7, 2011 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This investigation was aimed at investigating effect of low water potential generated by PEG on growth, sugar content and stress related enzymes (catalase, GPOX) at seedling level. Additionally gene expression was also studied using SDS-PAGE. A total of twelve moth bean genotypes comprising of elite moth bean lines were evaluated for desiccation tolerance at germination and seedling stage. Germination was happened differentially at 8% PEG while 15% PEG induced wilting in 7d old seedlings. Longer roots and shoots, higher dry weight of root and shoots both in control and treated seedlings was observed with desiccation tolerance. Drought tolerant and sensitive varieties differed in their protein profiling with newer genes showing their expression in tolerant once. Two genes were found up regulated in all tolerant varieties during PEG induced stress. Higher basal activity of enzymes (GPOX and catalase) and total soluble sugar during water deficit in drought tolerant varieties was reported.
Water deficit, vigna aconitifolia, drought tolerance
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14323525
IDR: 14323525
Список литературы In-vitro response of Vigna aconitifolia to drought stress induced by PEG - 6000
- Al Hakimi A., Monneveux P. and Galiba G. (1995). Soluble sugars, proline and relative water content (RWC) as traits for improving drought tolerance and divergent selection for RWC from T. polonicum T. durum. J.Gen. Breed., 49: 237-244.
- Aslam M., Khan I.A., Saleem M. and Ali Z. (2006). Assessment of water stress tolerance in different maize accessions a germination and early growth stage. Pak. J. Bot., 38(5): 1571-1579.
- Fischer R.A. and Maurer R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yields responses. Aust. J. Agri. Res., 29:897-912.
- Garsia-Reina G., Moreno V. and Luque A. (1988). Selection for NaCl tolerance in cell culture of three canary island tomato land races. Recovery of tolerant plantlets from NaCl tolerant cell strains. J. Pl. Phy., 133:1-6.
- Gill P.K., Sharma A.D., Singh P. and Bhullar S.S. (2001).Effect of various abiotic stresses on the growth, soluble sugar and water relation of sorghum seedlings growth in light and darkness. Bulg. J. Pl. phyl., 27(1-2): 72-84.
- Gopal J. and Iwana K. (2007). In vitro screening of potato against potato against water stress mediated through sorbital and polyethylene glycol. Pl. Cell Report, 26:693-700.
- Hanson A.D., Rathinasabapathi B., Rivoal J., Burnet M., Dillon M.O. and Gage D.A. (1994). Osmoprotective compounds in the Plubaginaceae: A natural experiment inmetabolic engineering of stress tolerance. Proc. Nat. Acad.Sci. USA, 91:306-310.
- Hoekstra, F.A., Golovina, E.V. and Buitink, J. (2001). Mechanism of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Pl. Sci., 9:431-439.
- Imanparast L. and Hassanpanah D. (2009). Response of Onobrychis genotypes to PEG 10000 induced osmotic stress. Biotechnology, 8(3): 365-369.
- Jaleel C.A., Manivannan P., Wahid A., Farooq M., Al-Juburi H.J., Somasundaram R. and Panneerselvam R. (2009). Drought stress in plants: A review on morphological characteristics and pigment composition. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 11:100-105.
- Kusaka M., Lalusin A.G. and Fujimuram T. (2005). The maintenance of growth and turgor in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. Leeke) cultivars with different root structures and osmo-regulation under drought stress. Pl. Sci., 168: 1-14.
- Larher F., Leport L., Petrivalsky M. and Chappart M. (1993). Effectors for the osmoinduced praline response in higher plants. Pl.Phy. Bioch., 31(6), 911-922.
- Morgan J.M. (1992). Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust. J. Pl. Phy., 19: 67-76.
- Munns R., Weir R. (1981) Contribution of sugars to osmotic adjustment in elongating and expanding zones of wheat leaves during moderate water deficits at two light levels. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 8, 93-105
- Nair A.S., Abraham T.K. and Jaya D.S. (2008). Studies on the changes in lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in drought stress induced cowpea (Vigna unguiculataL.) varieties. J. Envir. Biol.,29(5) 689-691.
- Nayar H. and Gupta D. (2006). Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Envir. Exp. Bot., 58:106-113.
- Nayer Mohammadkhani and Reza Heidari (2008). Drought-induced Accumulation of Soluble Sugars and Proline in Two Maize Varieties. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (3): 448-453
- Nepomuceno A.L., Oostrerhuis D.M. and Stewart J.M. (1998). Physiological reponses of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by Polythylene Glycol. Envir. Exp Bot., 40:29-41.
- Richards R.A., Rebetzke G.J. Condon A.G. and van Herwaarden, A.F. (2002). Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop. Sci., 42: 111-121.
- Shao H.B., Chu L.Y., Lu Z.H., Kang C.M. (2008). Primary oxidant scavenging and redox signaling in higher plants. Int J Biol Sci; 4:8-14
- Siddiqui Z., Khan M.A., Kim B.G., Huang J.S., Kwon T.R. (2008). Physiological Responses of Brassica napus Genotypes to Combined Drought and Salt Stress. Plant Stress, 2 (1): 78-83.
- Sunderland N. (1960). Cell division and expansion in the growth of the leaf. J. Exp. Bot.,11: -80.
- Viswanathan C. and Khanna-Chopra R. (1996). Heat shock proteins -Role in thermotolerance of crop plants. Curr. Sci., 71:275-284.
- Zhu J.K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol., 53:247-73