Inbreeding depression of simmental cattle in the system of genetic and environmental factors assessment
Автор: Shendakov A.I.
Журнал: Вестник аграрной науки @vestnikogau
Рубрика: Сельскохозяйственные науки
Статья в выпуске: 6 (69), 2017 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The article is devoted to the problems of inbreeding depression minimization in a herd of Simmental cattle. The author analyses the data received during the experimental research of the evaluation of the intensity of Simmental calves growth using different degrees of inbreeding, including in-and-inbreeding, bottom crossing, top-cross inbreeding, in-breed-line-crossing. The results of the experiment showed that at bottom crossing, top-cross inbreeding, in-breed-line-crossing the influence of genetic factors on live weight from birth to 6 months in bulls increases to 73.7-75.8, also in 7, 8, 9 and 10 months heifers with Fx=25.0% left behind heifers with Fx= 0.781% and 24.8, 31.0, 41.7 and 43.2 kg, respectively (p
Genetic factors, in-and-inbreeding, bottom crossing, top-cross inbreeding, in-breed-line-crossing, inbreeding depression, simmental cattle
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147124489
IDR: 147124489 | DOI: 10.15217/ISSN2587-666X.2017.6.83
Текст научной статьи Inbreeding depression of simmental cattle in the system of genetic and environmental factors assessment
Introduction. As opposed to domestic breeding, the use of genetic parameters is accepted in the world practice and many scientists write about it [1, 2, 4, 7, 9-11]. At the same time an integral part of research in the analysis of genetic parameters in the foreign works is the study of the problems of inbreeding [3, 5, 8, 14]. These and other aspects of genetic selection of cattle disclose the article quoted in the list of references [6, 12-13]. Due to the active use of artificial insemination this question is relevant in many countries.
The purpose of research: to study the importance of genetic and environmental factors in minimizing inbreeding depression on live weight of Simmental cattle.
Methods and research materials. To solve the problems of minimization of inbreeding depression we carried out a research in the farm "Fatnevo", Bolhov area of the Orel region. For improving of Simmental herd in this sector Simmental and Red-and-White Holstein bulls of JSC "Orel" for stock breeding have been mainly used in recent years. In the study of the heifers growth intensity the control group was presented by animals obtained by method of close inbreeding, in the study of the growth rate of calves the control group was presented by animals obtained by in-and-inbreeding (i.e. in a few generations) and complex inbreeding. The animals were of the same age. The coefficient of inbreeding was calculated as Wright. The statistical analysis was carried out in the computer program "Microsoft Excel".
Results and discussion. The previously conducted research has shown that in the inbred population of Simmental and Red-and-White Simmental-Holstein cattle of farm "Fatnevo" the greatest live weight at birth had heifers obtained by close inbreeding (32.5 kg), but heifers (n=30) obtained by the top-cross inbreeding (i.e. using inbred fathers raising IV-IV and V-V), also gave higher live weight – 31.2 kg (table 1). By the end of the first month of growing the greatest live weight had heifers obtained by close inbreeding and distant inbreeding: live weight from 1 to 12 months increased from 57.0 and 53.5 to 268.0 and 266.0 kg, respectively. And by 7, 8, 9 and 10 months heifers with F x =25.0% left behind heifers with F x =0.781% and 24.8, 31.0, 41.7 and 43.2 kg, respectively (p<0.1-0.05).
Table 1 – The live weight of Simmental heifers from the birth to 12 months in the inbred groups on farm of "Fatnevo"
Forms of inbreeding |
n |
Ф ср ф Е ф ф 0_ |
Live weight on the months, kg |
||||||||||||
So со g |
JZ § Е |
JZ о Е см |
JZ о Е со |
JZ с о Е |
JZ с о Е ю |
JZ о Е со |
JZ с о Е |
JZ с о Е со |
JZ о Е о |
JZ о Е о |
JZ с о Е |
JZ о Е см |
|||
close inbreeding Fx=25,0% |
2 |
M |
32,5 |
57,0 |
84,5 |
108,0 |
125,0 |
133,0 |
149,0 |
172,0 |
196,5 |
224,5 |
241,0 |
253,5 |
268,0 |
±m |
0,5 |
5,0 |
8,5 |
12,1 |
14,0 |
11,1 |
14,0 |
18,1 |
16,5 |
8,51 |
9,0 |
11,6 |
12,1 |
||
C v, % |
2,1 |
12,4 |
14,2 |
15,7 |
15,8 |
11,7 |
13,3 |
14,8 |
11,9 |
5,3 |
5,2 |
6,4 |
6,3 |
||
in-and-inbreeding |
8 |
M |
28,2 |
45,1 |
64,2 |
86,0 |
98,1 |
110,4 |
124,4 |
138,1 |
150,6 |
167,7 |
190,0 |
205,6 |
221,6 |
±m |
0,2 |
2,1 |
3,3 |
4,1 |
2,5 |
2,1 |
3,6 |
2,9 |
2,8 |
4,1 |
4,7 |
4,3 |
4,4 |
||
C v, % |
2,5 |
13,3 |
14,6 |
13,4 |
7,1 |
5,3 |
8,1 |
5,9 |
5,2 |
6,9 |
7,0 |
5,9 |
5,6 |
||
distant inbreeding (III-IV и IV-IV) |
6 |
M |
28,8 |
53,5 |
77,8 |
96,2 |
112,3 |
124,5 |
139,2 |
147,2 |
165,5 |
182,8 |
197,8 |
215,8 |
266,0 |
±m |
0,3 |
2,7 |
4,9 |
2,5 |
5,0 |
7,3 |
10,6 |
10,4 |
10,0 |
9,8 |
10,4 |
10,1 |
10,2 |
||
C v, % |
2,8 |
12,5 |
15,6 |
6,3 |
10,9 |
14,4 |
18,6 |
17,2 |
14,8 |
13,1 |
12,9 |
11,5 |
9,4 |
||
bottom crossing |
35 |
M |
29,9 |
50,9 |
70,0 |
86,6 |
100,9 |
111,4 |
121,5 |
132,4 |
147,0 |
162,2 |
178,3 |
194,7 |
211,5 |
±m |
0,3 |
1,0 |
1,8 |
2,2 |
2,8 |
3,3 |
4,0 |
4,8 |
5,3 |
5,4 |
5,5 |
5,6 |
5,7 |
||
C v, % |
5,2 |
12,0 |
15,3 |
14,8 |
16,4 |
17,5 |
19,6 |
21,5 |
21,2 |
19,6 |
18,1 |
16,9 |
15,9 |
||
top-cross inbreeding |
30 |
M |
31,2 |
51,2 |
71,8 |
89,7 |
101,9 |
113,9 |
125,7 |
139,2 |
155,1 |
174,0 |
190,6 |
205,4 |
221,0 |
±m |
0,4 |
1,0 |
1,6 |
1,6 |
1,9 |
2,3 |
3,1 |
4,0 |
4,4 |
5,0 |
6,0 |
6,4 |
6,5 |
||
C v, % |
7,7 |
10,4 |
12,0 |
10,0 |
10,1 |
11,2 |
13,5 |
15,9 |
15,4 |
15,9 |
17,2 |
17,1 |
16,2 |
||
in-breed-linecrossing and incross-breeding |
6 |
M |
29,2 |
47,2 |
68,0 |
88,8 |
102,7 |
107,3 |
111,3 |
117,7 |
130,8 |
152,5 |
173,8 |
190,8 |
217,0 |
±m |
0,4 |
1,9 |
2,7 |
2,3 |
2,6 |
4,3 |
6,7 |
9,4 |
13,0 |
15,6 |
14,4 |
13,6 |
13,7 |
||
C v, % |
3,3 |
9,9 |
9,6 |
6,4 |
5,9 |
9,8 |
14,8 |
19,5 |
24,4 |
25,1 |
20,4 |
17,4 |
15,5 |
||
All inbred group in herd |
87 |
M |
30,1 |
50,4 |
70,7 |
88,9 |
102,4 |
113,2 |
124,1 |
135,9 |
151,2 |
168,8 |
185,8 |
201,4 |
218,7 |
±m |
0,2 |
0,7 |
1,1 |
1,2 |
1,4 |
1,7 |
2,2 |
2,7 |
3,0 |
3,2 |
3,4 |
3,5 |
3,6 |
||
C v, % |
6,6 |
12,2 |
14,3 |
12,5 |
13,2 |
14,1 |
16,7 |
18,4 |
18,4 |
17,8 |
17,1 |
16,0 |
15,3 |
Afterwards, the animals of these groups were able to put on live weight by 18-month necessary for normal fertilization, and heifers obtained by bottom crossing (i.e. by fertilization of inbred mothers with semen of outbreed bulls) at 12 months gave the worst index – total 211.5±5.7 kg, which gave way to heifers with F x =25.0% 56.5 kg (p<0.001).
Among inbred herds of bull calves the group obtained by top-cross inbreeding (n=28) – 29.9±0.2 kg was different at birth (table 2), although there was no significant difference in all groups. From 2 to 4 months animals obtained by mating inbred mothers and outbreed fathers (the increase was from 48.3 to 86.6 kg) forged over growth rate in the herd, but by 5 and 6 months the group obtained from the use of inbred fathers semen – 99.1±2.5 and 113.6±3.0 kg showed the greatest live weight again, which exceeded the animals in the control group at 13.2 and 18.3 kg, respectively (p<0.001). The live weight variation in the groups and months was not stable and may be evidence of a strong dependence of the individual inbred bulls on feeding and keeping.
Table 2 – The live weight of Simmental bull calves from the birth to 5 months in the inbred groups on farm of "Fatnevo"
Forms of inbreeding |
n |
ел о Е СП |
Live weight on the months, kg |
|||||
m | |
_с о Е |
_с о Е см |
_с "с о Е со |
_с о Е |
_с о Е LO |
|||
in-and-inbreeding |
8 |
M |
29,7 |
45,1 |
61,5 |
80,2 |
85,9 |
95,3 |
±m |
0,1 |
1,8 |
3,1 |
3,7 |
1,5 |
2,7 |
||
σ |
0,43 |
5,08 |
8,79 |
10,53 |
4,15 |
7,67 |
||
C v, % |
1,45 |
11,27 |
14,29 |
13,12 |
4,84 |
8,05 |
||
distant inbreeding (III-IV и IV-IV) |
7 |
M |
29,4 |
45,9 |
64,4 |
84,9 |
96,0 |
103,9 |
±m |
0,49 |
4,15 |
6,65 |
7,10 |
7,89 |
9,93 |
||
σ |
0,2 |
1,6 |
2,5 |
2,7 |
3,0 |
3,7 |
||
C v, % |
1,68 |
9,06 |
10,32 |
8,37 |
8,22 |
9,56 |
||
bottom crossing |
19 |
M |
29,5 |
48,3 |
67,4 |
86,6 |
96,1 |
105,6 |
±m |
0,2 |
1,1 |
2,1 |
3,0 |
2,4 |
3,3 |
||
σ |
1,09 |
4,75 |
9,37 |
13,01 |
10,57 |
14,33 |
||
C v, % |
3,71 |
9,85 |
13,90 |
15,01 |
11,00 |
13,56 |
||
top-cross inbreeding |
28 |
M |
29,9 |
48,1 |
66,7 |
84,5 |
99,1 |
113,6 |
±m |
0,2 |
0,8 |
1,4 |
1,9 |
2,5 |
3,0 |
||
σ |
1,13 |
4,05 |
7,27 |
10,13 |
13,02 |
15,80 |
||
C v, % |
3,78 |
8,43 |
10,90 |
11,99 |
13,14 |
13,91 |
||
in-breed-linecrossing and incross-breeding |
10 |
M |
29,3 |
46,2 |
62,9 |
83,2 |
96,3 |
104,8 |
±m |
0,1 |
1,2 |
2,4 |
2,4 |
3,5 |
4,7 |
||
σ |
0,46 |
3,87 |
7,46 |
7,64 |
11,10 |
14,99 |
||
C v, % |
1,56 |
8,37 |
11,86 |
9,18 |
11,53 |
14,31 |
||
All inbred group in herd |
72 |
M |
29,6 |
47,3 |
65,6 |
84,5 |
96,2 |
107,5 |
±m |
0,1 |
0,5 |
1,0 |
1,2 |
1,4 |
1,8 |
||
σ |
0,97 |
4,51 |
8,29 |
10,65 |
11,69 |
15,28 |
||
C v, % |
3,28 |
9,53 |
12,64 |
12,61 |
12,15 |
14,22 |
However, the study of correlations between live weight of calves (table 3) has testified that the influence of genetic factors on the growth rate increases with the mating of inbred mothers and outbreed bulls and vice versa (73.7%). This may be confirmation of inbreeding depression reduction. In-breed-line-crossing and in-crossbreeding are also able to reduce inbreeding depression against live weight in bulls due to the complex forms of inheritance when mating animals of different breeds and lines.
Table 3 – Influence of genetic and environmental factors on the live weight of calves Simmental
Forms of inbreeding |
n |
сл ср О Е сп СП |
Correlations between live weight in different periods of breeding (at birth to 6 months) |
Influence of genetic and environmental factors, % |
||||||
1 _С £ с о 5 Е "сП 1- |
0 1- 04 |
и (М ” |
0 со ^ |
0 ^ ю |
и ю 60 |
r w· 100 |
(1-r w)· 100 |
|||
Bull calves |
||||||||||
in-and-inbreeding (control group) |
8 |
r |
0,695 |
0,953 |
0,888 |
-0,616 |
0,728 |
0,956 |
60,1 |
39,9 |
±m r |
0,840 |
0,040 |
0,055 |
0,094 |
0,082 |
0,035 |
||||
distant inbreeding (III-IV и IV-IV) |
7 |
r |
0,099 |
0,886 |
0,915 |
0,734 |
0,789 |
0,924 |
72,5 |
27,5 |
±m r |
0,119 |
0,055 |
0,048 |
0,081 |
0,073 |
0,046 |
||||
bottom crossing |
19 |
r |
0,166 |
0,930 |
0,967 |
0,862 |
0,894 |
0,936 |
73,7 |
26,3 |
±m r |
0,102 |
0,044 |
0,030 |
0,061 |
0,054 |
0,042 |
||||
top-cross inbreeding |
28 |
r |
0,007 |
0,887 |
0,825 |
0,886 |
0,888 |
0,941 |
73,7 |
26,3 |
±m r |
0,001 |
0,055 |
0,068 |
0,055 |
0,055 |
0,040 |
||||
in-breed-line-crossing and in-cross-breeding |
10 |
r |
0,248 |
0,992 |
0,811 |
0,634 |
0,917 |
0,947 |
75,8 |
24,2 |
±m r |
0,116 |
0,015 |
0,070 |
0,092 |
0,048 |
0,039 |
||||
All inbred group in herd |
72 |
r |
0,025 |
0,924 |
0,883 |
0,828 |
0,885 |
0,945 |
74,8 |
25,2 |
±m r |
0,120 |
0,046 |
0,056 |
0,067 |
0,056 |
0,039 |
||||
Heifers |
||||||||||
in-and-inbreeding (control group) |
8 |
r |
-0,142 |
0,979 |
0,959 |
0,915 |
0,869 |
0,907 |
74,8 |
25,2 |
±m r |
0,107 |
0,022 |
0,030 |
0,044 |
0,053 |
0,046 |
||||
distant inbreeding (III-IV и IV-IV) |
6 |
r |
-0,099 |
0,981 |
0,794 |
0,838 |
0,955 |
0,981 |
74,2 |
25,8 |
±m r |
0,107 |
0,021 |
0,066 |
0,06 |
0,032 |
0,021 |
||||
bottom crossing |
34 |
r |
0,201 |
0,908 |
0,876 |
0,868 |
0,933 |
0,950 |
78,9 |
21,1 |
±m r |
0,106 |
0,040 |
0,055 |
0,055 |
0,053 |
0,030 |
||||
top-cross inbreeding |
28 |
r |
0,344 |
0,893 |
0,772 |
0,886 |
0,846 |
0,932 |
77,9 |
22,1 |
±m r |
0,100 |
0,045 |
0,071 |
0,055 |
0,055 |
0,045 |
||||
in-breed-line-crossing and in-cross-breeding |
6 |
r |
-0,094 |
0,974 |
0,782 |
0,254 |
0,883 |
0,973 |
62,9 |
37,1 |
±m r |
0,110 |
0,024 |
0,067 |
0,105 |
0,055 |
0,024 |
||||
All inbred group in herd |
88 |
r |
0,281 |
0,916 |
0,845 |
0,866 |
0,909 |
0,947 |
79,4 |
20,6 |
±m r |
0,110 |
0,043 |
0,054 |
0,054 |
0,045 |
0,035 |
The genetic variability of live weight from the generation to 6 months was above heifers – from 1.588 to 16.428 kg (table 4); however, environmental variability was above in bull calves from the second month of cultivation (from 2.106 to 4.915 kg). This can be the proof of the fact that the inbred bull calves needed the intensive feeding.
Table 4 – The genetic and environmental variability of the live weight in the inbred groups of Simmental young animals of "Fatnevo"
Inbred group in herd |
n |
сл ср Е |
Variability of the live weight, kg |
||||||
-С 15 "сп |
о Е |
о Е см |
о Е со |
_с "с о Е чГ |
_с "с о Е LO |
_С о Е CD |
|||
Bull calves |
72 |
σ G |
0,726 |
3,373 |
6,201 |
7,966 |
8,744 |
11,429 |
15,332 |
σ e |
0,246 |
1,145 |
2,106 |
2,705 |
2,969 |
3,881 |
4,915 |
||
σ р |
0,972 |
4,518 |
8,307 |
10,671 |
11,713 |
15,31 |
20,247 |
||
Heifers |
88 |
σ G |
1,588 |
4,875 |
8,019 |
8,829 |
10,743 |
12,688 |
16,428 |
σ e |
0,412 |
1,265 |
2,081 |
2,291 |
2,787 |
3,292 |
4,262 |
||
σ р |
2,001 |
6,140 |
10,100 |
11,120 |
13,531 |
15,981 |
20,690 |
Conclusions on the results. Summarizing the results of this study it should be noted that in the selection of Simmental cattle according to the growth rate the results depend to a greater degree not on inbreeding variants but on compatibility of the individual parental pairs. Inbreeding for several generations and complex inbreeding remain highly undesirable, as when it appears inbreeding depression shows it maximum. Mating of inbred cows with outbreed bulls and outbreed cows with inbred bulls does not give the unambiguous results, however it can be assumed that the method of bottom crossing can be applied to the large stud bulls only, while top-breeding and top-cross breeding can avoid serious consequences only in mating cases when a cow has a high live weight. The uncontrolled use of inbred mating is unacceptable, though moderate congeniality when mating does not lead to a significant inbreeding depression in growth intensity of heifers and steers. The cases of incest in breeding of Simmental cattle are permitted only at presence of the outstanding qualities of the paired parents. The bottom crossing and top-cross inbreeding, in-breed-line-crossing and in-cross-breeding allow strengthening the influence of genetic factors at a live weight of calves from birth to 6 months. In general, the conducted investigations enable to weaken the negative effects of inbreeding of dairy and beef cattle of Orel region.
In the system of the minimization of the inbred depression in Simmental herds by the live weight should be considered the sex of calf, the form of inbreeding, the environmental factors (i. e. to balance fodders for the heifers and bull calves separately) and the periods of cultivation. This will make it possible to strengthen the intensity of an increase in the live weight.
Список литературы Inbreeding depression of simmental cattle in the system of genetic and environmental factors assessment
- Abe H, Masuda Y, Suzuki M. Relationships between reproductive traits of heifers and cows and yield traits for Holsteins in Japan//J. Dairy Sci. 2009. № 92. Р. 4055-4062.
- Eyre-Walker A., Keightley P.D. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations//Nature Publishing Group, 2007. № 8. P. 610-618.
- Effects of inbreeding in the dam on dystocia and stillbirths in US Holsteins/V. Adamecet al.//J. Dairy Sci. 2006. № 89. Р. 307-314.
- Heritabilities, genetic correlations, and genetic change for female fertility and protein yield in Norwegian dairy cattle/I.M. Andersen-Ranberg et al.//J. Dairy Sci. 2005. № 88. Р. 348-355.
- Biffani S., Samoré A.B., Canavesi F. Inbreeding depression for production, reproduction and functional traits in Italian Holstein cattle//In: Proc. World Congr. Genet. Montpellier, France: Applied to Livest. Prod., 2002. p. 183-186.
- Bijma P.J., van Arendonk A.M., Woolliams J.A. Prediction rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes//J. Anim. Sci. 2001. № 79. Р. 840-853.
- Genetic parameters of milk coagulation properties and their relationships with milk yield and quality traits in Italian Holstein cows/M. Cassandro et al.//J. Dairy Sci. 2008. № 91. Р. 371-376.
- Inbreeding depression for global and partial economic indexes, production, type and functional traits/C. Croquet et al.//J. Dairy Sci. 2006. № 89. Р. 2257-2267.
- De Roos A.P.W., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations//Genetics. 2009. № 183. Р. 1545-1553.
- Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls/A.P.W. De Roos et al.//J. Dairy Sci. 2011. № 94. Р. 1559-1567.
- Gholap P.N., Kale D.S., Sirothia A.R. Genetic Diseases in Cattle: A Review//Research Journal of Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sciences. 2014. Vol. 2(2). Р. 24-33.
- König S., Simianer H. Approaches to the management of inbreeding and relationship in the German Holstein dairy cattle population//Livest. Sci. 2006. № 103. Р. 40-53.
- Evaluation of inbreeding in laying hens by applying optimum genetic contribution and gene flow theory/S. König et al. Poult. Sci. 2010. № 89. Р. 658-667.
- Wiggans G.R., Van Raden P.M., Zuurbier J. Calculation and use of inbreeding coefficients for genetic evaluation of United States dairy cattle//J. Dairy Sci. 1995. № 78. Р. 1584-1590.