Influence of the spouse on reproductive attitudes and motives

Influence of the spouse on reproductive attitudes and motives

Автор: Burkhanova Flyura B., Baimurzina Guzel R.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

As a micro-level factor, the spouses or partners influence each other’s reproductive intentions, motives, and decisions. This article examines only two areas of influence from a possible spectrum, namely the impact of the nature of the relationship and the other spouse’s position on having children. The empirical basis is the opinion poll “Demographic well-being of Russia”, conducted in 2020 in 10 regions, including Moscow. Respondents, both officially married and being in cohabiting relationship, aged up to 49 years old inclusive (2,776 people) participated in the survey. According to the evaluations of relationships using the criteria of “cohesion”, “conflicts”, and “big quarrels and scandals”, respondents were divided into three groups: the worst (12-16%), average (29-36%), and best (42-53%) evaluations. The most favorable relations are typical of families with a traditional power structure (husband is head of the family), joint management of income (husband and wife make decisions together), better living conditions, and younger age of the spouses. We found that an improvement in relationship estimates was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of those intending to have a child, while a deterioration in the estimates was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of those intending to have a child. The groups with the most cohesive, conflict-free relationships are the most likely to have children in the coming years, and it increases if new family support measures are introduced. In postponing the birth of children of different order, as well as in planning their birth, the position of the other spouse or partner (the desire to postpone having a child or the intention to have one) is one of the most significant motives of reproductive behavior. The importance of motives is conditioned by both favorable and unfavorable relations in families. The results of the study actualize one of the directions of state socio-demographic and family policy - activities to harmonize marital and family relationships and to reduce the influence of a range of factors complicating these relationships, which can have a positive impact on the decision to have children.

Еще

Reproductive attitudes, reproductive intentions, reproductive motives, reproductive decisions, marriage, marital relationships, marital conflicts, adverse relationships, favorable relationships

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238039

IDR: 147238039   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.12

Список литературы Influence of the spouse on reproductive attitudes and motives

  • Arkhangel’skii V.N. (2006). Faktory rozhdaemosti [Fertility Factors]. Moscow: TEIS.
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Rostovskaya T.K., Vasil’eva E.N. (2021). Influence of the standard of living on the reproductive behavior of Russians: Gender aspect. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=Woman in Russian Society, Special issue, 3–24. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2021.0 (in Russian).
  • Arkhangel’skii V.N., Shul’gin S.G., Zin’kina Yu.V. (2020). Reproductive behavior of Russian women as depending on their level of education. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 546–559 (in Russian).
  • Baimurzina G.R., Vasil’eva E.N. (2021). Modern Russian family: Factors of forming reproductive and marital behavior models. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 4(4). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2021.4.31 (in Russian).
  • Balbo N., Billari F.C., Mills M. (2017). Fertility in advances societies: A review of research. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 4(2), 133–195 (in Russian).
  • Burkhanova F.B., Mukhamadieva R.R. (2020). Settings for the number of children in Bashkirs, consisting of in mono-ethnic and interethnic marriages. In: Khilazheva G.F., Komleva R.N. (Eds.) Demograficheskie chteniya (Vyzovy i tendentsii demograficheskogo razvitiya Rossii i ee regionov): Sb. statei Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Ufa, 22 maya 2020 g.) [Demographic Readings (Challenges and Trends in Demographic Development of Russia and its Regions): Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. (Ufa, May 22, 2020)]. Ufa: Gilem, Bashk. entsikl.
  • Churilova E., Zakharov S. (2019). Reproductive attitudes of the Russian population: Is there reason for optimism? Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya=The Russian Public Opinion Herald, 2(129), 69–89 (in Russian).
  • Gudkova T. (2019). Fertility intentions in Russia: Motivation and constraints. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 6(4), 83–103 (in Russian).
  • Gurko T.A. (2014). Married couples’ reproductive plans. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 77–85 (in Russian).
  • Guzzo K.B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci, 654(1), 66–86. DOI: 10.1177/0002716214525571
  • Makarentseva A.O., Galieva N.I., Rogozin D.M. (2021). Desire (not) to have children in the population surveys. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 492–515. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.4.1871 (in Russian).
  • Miller W.B., Severy L.J., Pasta D.J. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, 58(2), 193–205.
  • Myers S.M. (1997). Marital uncertainty and childbearing. Social Forces, 75(4), 1271–1289. DOI: 10.2307/2580671
  • Nazarova I.B., Zelenskaya M.P. (2017). Reproductive attitudes of the student youth (a review of empirical studies). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology, 17(4), 555–567. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-4-555-567 (in Russian).
  • Rostovskaya T.K., Shabunova A.A., Arkhangel’skii V.N. et al. (2021). Demograficheskoe samochuvstvie regionov Rossii. Natsional’nyi demograficheskii doklad-2021 [Demographic well-being of Russian regions. National Demographic Report-2021]. FCTAS RAS. Moscow: Perspektiva. DOI: 10.38085/978-5-905790-49-2-2020-1-210
  • Sinel’nikov A.B. (2019). Transformation of marriage and fertility in Russia. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2, 27–39. DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00013 (in Russian).
  • Testa M.R., Cavalli L., Rosina A. (2012). The decision of whether to have a child: Does couple disagreement matter? Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers, No. 7/2012. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/96990
  • Thomson E., Hoem J.M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demоgraphy, 35(3), 315–322.
  • Thomson E., Lappegard T., Carlson M., Evans A., Gray E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography, 51, 485–508. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-013-0273-6
  • Tyndik A.O. (2012). Reproductive attitudes and their realization in modern Russia. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 10(3), 361–376 (in Russian).
  • Vikat A., Thomson E., Hoem J.M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies, 53(2), 211–225.
  • Zakharov S.V., Churilova E.V., Agadzhanyan V.S. (2016). Fertility in higher-order marital unions in Russia: Does a new partnership allow for the realization of the two-child ideal? Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 3(1), 35–51 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp