Integrating landscape ecological risk with ecosystem services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

Integrating landscape ecological risk with ecosystem services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

Автор: Boori Mukesh Singh, Choudhary Komal, Kupriyanov Alexander

Журнал: Компьютерная оптика @computer-optics

Рубрика: Обработка изображений, распознавание образов

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.48, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

It is a novel approach to linking landscape ecological risk (LER) and ecosystem services (ESs) for environmental management and sustainable development, since it enables real-time decision-making. This study used 12 natural factors relevant to LER and 11 ESs factors to analyze spatiotemporal changes and establish a relationship between them in Tatarstan, Russia, for the years 2010, 2015, and 2020. The statistical tests (Global Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi*), analysis of habitat vulnerability, and ecological loss in the ArcGIS platform reveal a consistent variance in factor clustering and pattern as well as the impact of governmental policies in the studied area. According to analysis findings, 2015 had the best ecological conditions of the three years because 44.79 % of the research area had decreased landscape ecological risk, which increased ecosystem services. Additionally, the results show that both maps have significant spatial disparities and that LER and ESs are negatively impacted by high human-socioeconomic activity. The integration of LER and ESs through the overlap of both maps provides a significant amount of spatial information for mapping, monitoring, management, and the protection of the fragile environment for sustainable landscape development and management.

Еще

Landscape ecological risk, ecosystem services, habitat vulnerability, spatiotemporal evolution, remote sensing, gis

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140303280

IDR: 140303280   |   DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-CO-1296

Список литературы Integrating landscape ecological risk with ecosystem services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

  • Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong dT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 2014; 10(1): 40-53. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2014.884166.
  • Azadi H, Passel SV, Cools J. Rapid economic valuation of ecosystem services in man and biosphere reserves in Africa: A review. Glob Ecol Conserv 2021; 28: e01697.
  • Dhakal B, Kattel RR. Effects of global changes on ecosystems services of multiple natural resources in mountain agricultural landscapes. Sci Total Environ 2019; 676: 665-682.
  • He J, Shi X, Fu Y, Yuan Y. Evaluation and simulation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services trade-offs in ecological restoration areas, China. Land Use Policy 2020; 99: 105020.
  • Zhang R, Fu B, Wang K, Zhao W. Objective indicators contribute more than subjective beliefs to resident willingness to pay for ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau. J Environ Manage 2021; 285: 112048.
  • Syrbe RU, Grunewald K. Ecosystem service supply and demand – the challenge to balance spatial mismatches. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 2017; 13(2): 148-161. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2017.1407362.
  • Boori MS, Choudhary K, Paringer R, Kupriyanov A. Eco-environmental quality assessment based on pressure-state-response framework by remote sensing and GIS. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 2021; 23: 100530. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100530.
  • Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Settele J. Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: Between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools. Ecosyst Serv 2015; 16: 201-211.
  • Huang X, Han X, Ma S, Lin T, Gong J. Monitoring ecosystem service change in the City of Shenzhen by the use of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery and deep learning. Land Degrad Dev 2019; 30(12): 1490-1501.
  • Mondal, PP, Zhang Y. Research progress on changes in land use and land cover in the Western Himalayas (India) and effects on ecosystem services. Sustainability 2018; 10: 4504. DOI: 10.3390/su10124504.
  • Cui F, Wang B, Zhang Q, Tang H, Maeyer PD, Hamdi R, Dai L. Climate change versus land-use change—What affects the ecosystem services more in the forest-steppe ecotone? Sci Total Environ 2021; 759: 143525.
  • Liu J, Wang M, Yang L. Assessing landscape ecological risk induced by land-use/cover change in a county in China: A GIS- and Landscape-metric-based approach. Sustainability 2020; 12: 9037. DOI: 10.3390/su12219037.
  • Leitão AB, Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 2002; 59(2): 65-93.
  • Fu C, Harasawa H, Kasyanov V, Kim JW, Ojima D, Wan Z, Zhao S. Regional-global interactions in East Asia. In Book: Tyson P, et al, eds. Global-regional linkages in the Earth system. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2002. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56228-0_4.
  • Kang J, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhang B. Ecological security pattern: A new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Glob Ecol Conserv 2021; 26: e01472.
  • De Sherbinin A. A guide to land-use and land-cover change (LUCC). Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, Palisades, New York. In Book: East R, ed. African antelope database 1998. Switzerland, Cambridge: IUCN/SSC Antelope Specialist Group; 1999. ISBN: 2-8317-0477-4.
  • Liu, C, Li W, Zhu G, Zhou H, Yan H, Xue P. Land use/land cover changes and their driving factors in the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau based on geographical detectors and Google Earth engine: A case study in Gannan Prefecture. Remote Sens 2020; 12: 3139. DOI: 10.3390/rs12193139.
  • Zang Z, Zou X, Zuo P, Song Q, Wang C, Wang J. Impact of landscape patterns on ecological vulnerability and ecosystem service values: An empirical analysis of Yancheng Nature Reserve in China. Ecol Indic 2017; 72: 142-152.
  • Boori MS, Choudhary K, Kupriyanov A. Crop growth monitoring through Sentinel and Landsat data based NDVI time-series. Computer Optics 2020; 44(3): 409-419. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-CO-635.
  • Sallam MF, Fizer C, Pilant AN, Whung PY. Systematic review: Land cover, meteorological, and socioeconomic determinants of Aedes Mosquito Habitat for risk mapping. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: 1230. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101230.
  • Li Z, Roux E, Dessay N, Girod R, Stefani A, Nacher M, Moiret A, Seyler F. Mapping a knowledge-based malaria hazard index related to landscape using remote sensing: Application to the cross-border area between French Guiana and Brazil. Remote Sens 2016; 8: 319. DOI: 10.3390/rs8040319.
  • Vannevel R, Goethals PLM. Identifying ecosystem key factors to support sustainable water management. Sustainability 2020; 12: 1148. DOI: 10.3390/su12031148.
  • Lähde E, Khadka A, Tahvonen O, Kokkonen T. Can we really have it all?—Designing multifunctionality with sustainable urban drainage system elements. Sustainability 2019; 11: 1854. DOI: 10.3390/su11071854.
  • Pearce BJ, Ejderyan O. Joint problem framing as reflexive practice: honing a transdisciplinary skill. Sustain Sci 2020; 15: 683-698. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00744-2.
  • Lu N, Fu, B, Jin T, Chang R. Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landscape Ecol 2014; 29: 1697-1708. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0101-4.
  • Boori MS, Choudhary K, Kupriyanov A. Detecting vegetation drought dynamic in European Russia. Geocarto International 2022; 37(9): 2490-2505. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1750063.
  • Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill; 1980.
  • Mogaji KA, Lim HS. Application of a GIS-/remote sensing-based approach for predicting groundwater potential zones using a multi-criteria data mining methodology. Environ Monit Assess 2017; 189: 321.
  • Palm C, Canqui HB, DeClerck F, Gatere L, Grace P. Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2014; 187: 87-105.
  • Zhuang DF, Liu JY. Modeling of regional differentiation of land-use degree in China. Chinese Geogr Sci 1997; 7(4): 302-309.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©