Interactions of regional economies and multiplicative effects (using the example of a two-zone input-output model of Russia)

Interactions of regional economies and multiplicative effects (using the example of a two-zone input-output model of Russia)

Автор: Suslov V.I., Dushenin A.I., Ershov Yu.S., Ibragimov N.M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Currently, the key areas of Siberian economics include analyzing the economy and assessing the prospects of the Asian part of Russia. To achieve the goal, it is necessary to determine the contribution of the Asian part of Russia to the economy of other regions and the country as a whole. The aim of this work is to study the interaction of Russia's European and Asian parts. The input-output tables built in the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the European and Asian economic zones as of 2019 allow us to assess the effects of regional interaction at the industry level using multiplicative analysis tools. The paper presents calculated regional and interregional coefficients of direct and total costs, as well as balance sheets reflecting the creation and use of products for European and Asian regions. The results of the study indicate that in the structure of direct costs of the European part of Russia, the weight of the Asian part is significant for the production of coke and petroleum products (about 44%), ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy (about 15%) and other industries. In the structure of the total costs of the European part of Russia, a high proportion of the Asian part is observed for extractive industries, ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy and oil refining industry, which is partly due to the specifics of recording the results of foreign trade. If we consider the balance of use of products from the Asian part of Russia, we see that 7.5% of the produced product goes to intermediate consumption and 3.0% is sent to meet the final demand of European regions. The results of the work can be used to measure the effects of public financing at the regional and federal levels. Due to the fact that indirect and full costs account for only those product flows that relate to intermediate consumption, it seems advisable in the future to elaborate on the methodology so as to include accounting for investment goods.

Еще

Interregional interactions, multi-regional input-output models, european part of Russia, asian part of Russia, multiplicative effect, direct and indirect costs

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147247149

IDR: 147247149   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.6.96.3

Список литературы Interactions of regional economies and multiplicative effects (using the example of a two-zone input-output model of Russia)

  • Azorín J., Alpañez R., Sánchez-de-la-Vega M. (2022). A new proposal to model regional input–output structures using location quotients: An application to Korean and Spanish regions. Regional Science, 101(5), 1219–1237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12692
  • Blam Y.Sh., Mashkina L.V. (2019). Problems and prospects for the development of the forestry and logging industry. Vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal EKO=All-Russian Economic Journal ECO, 11, 45–62 (in Russian).
  • Dondokov Z.B.-D. et al. (2014). Input-output analysis of the economy of the Republic of Buryatia based on input-output tables. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 28(355), 55–62 (in Russian).
  • Dushenin A.I., Ibragimov N.M., Ershov Y.S. (2023). Multipliers in the analysis of interregional interactions. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 16(9), 1630–1643.
  • Ershov Iu.S. (2012). Spatial aspect of the Russian Economy and prospects of its development: Before and after the crisis. Regional Research of Russia, 2(1), 1–11.
  • Ershov Iu.S., Ibragimov N.M., Dushenin A.I. (2021). Input-output table regionalization and multiregional input-output model development algorithm. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 14(7), 1018–1027.
  • Flegg A., Tohmo T. (2013). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The use of the FLQ is not a gamble. Regional Studies, 50(2).
  • Flegg A., Webber C. (2000). Regional size, regional specialization and the FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 34, 563–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085675
  • Fujimoto T. (2018). Appropriate assumption on cross-hauling national input–output table regionalization. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(1), 106–128.
  • Fukui S. (2023). Estimating input coefficients for regional input-output tables using deep learning with mixup. Papers 2305.01201, arXiv.org. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01201
  • Gabela J. (2020). On the accuracy of gravity- RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: Evidence using the 2005 interregional input–output table of Japan. Economic Systems Research, 32(4), 521–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1753662.
  • Greaney T., Kiyota K. (2020). The gravity model and trade in intermediate inputs. The World Economy, 43(8), 2034–2049. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12947
  • Holy V., Safr K. (2023). Disaggregating input–output tables by the multidimensional RAS method: A case study of the Czech Republic. Economic Systems Research, 35(1), 95–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2022.2091978
  • Isard W., Keunne R. (1953). The impact of steel upon the Greater New York - Philadelphia Industrial Region. Review of Economics and Statistics, 35(4), 289–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924389
  • Jackson R., Járosi P. (2020). Consistent regional commodity-by-industry input-output accounts. Working Paper 2020-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
  • Junius T., Oosterhaven J. (2003). The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic System Research, 15(1), 87–97.
  • Kronenberg K., Fuchs M. (2022). The socio-economic impact of regional tourism: an occupation-based modelling perspective from Sweden. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(12), 2785–2805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1924757.
  • Lahr M., Ferreira J., Többen J. (2020). Intraregional trade shares for goods-producing industries: RPC estimates using EU data. Regional Science, 99(6), 1583–1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12541
  • Lamonica G., Recchioni C., Chelli M., Salvati L. (2020). The efficiency of the cross-entropy method when estimating the technical coefficients of input–output tables. Spatial Economic Analysis, 15(1), 62–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2019.1615634
  • Liu C., Lenzen M., Murray J. (2013). A disaggregated emissions inventory for Taiwan with uses in hybrid input-output life cycle analysis (IO-LCA). Natural Resources Forum, 36(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2012.01439.x
  • Malov V.Iu., Melentyev B.V. (2022). Transport system as an object of government management. Vestnik transporta=Transport Bulletin, 1, 9–11 (in Russian).
  • Mi Z., Meng J., Zheng H., Shan Y., Wei Y., Guan D. (2018). A multi-regional input-output table mapping China’s economic outputs and interdependencies in 2012. Scientific Data, 5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.155
  • Mikheeva N.N. (2005). Statistical evaluation of input-output tables for the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2, 61–79 (in Russian).
  • Mínguez R. (2009). Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input-output matrix. Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 329–348.
  • Morrissey K. (2016). A location quotient approach to producing regional production multipliers for the Irish economy. Regional Science, 95(3), 491–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12143
  • Novikova T.S., Suslov V.I., Gulakova O.I. (2021). Price aspects of evaluating investment projects. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Regions, 17(1), 16–30 (in Russian).
  • Oosterhaven J. (1980). Review of Dutch regional input-output analysis. The Annals in Regional Science, 14(3), 6–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287309
  • Oosterhaven J., Hewings G. (2014). Interregional input-output models. In: Handbook of Regional Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_43
  • Pereira-López X., Carrascal-Incera A., Fernández-Fernández M. (2020). A bidimensional reformulation of location quotients for generating input–output tables. Spatial Economic Analysis, 15(4), 476–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2020.1729996
  • Pereira López X., Sánchez Chóez N., Fernández Fernández M. (2021). Performance of bidimensional location quotients for constructing input–output tables. Journal of Economic Structures, 10(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00237-5
  • Richardson H. (1972). Input-Output and Regional Economics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Round J.I. (1972). Regional input-output models in the UK: A reappraisal of some techniques. Regional Studies, 6(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237200185011
  • Sayapova A.R. (2004). Input-output tables in the analysis and forecasting of structural parameters of the regional economy. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 6, 28–41 (in Russian).
  • Shen T. (1960). An input-output table with regional weights. Regional Science, 6, 113–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01706.x
  • Siroen J. (2014). Gravity Models, Interregional Input-Output, and Trade In Value Added: A New Approach Applied to Brazil Internal and International Trade [conference presentation abstract]. 22nd International Input-Output Conference & 4th Edition of the International School of I-O Analysis 14-18 July 2014, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Stone R. (1961). Input-Output and National Accounts. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • Suslov N.I., Buzulutskov V.F. (2018). About one approach when considering dynamics in models of the MRIOM class (using the example of MRIOM-FEC). Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya=World of Economics and Management, 18(4), 112–125 (in Russian).
  • Suslov V.I., Ibragimov N.M., Domozhirov D.A. (2021). Modeling and analysis of spatial equilibrium in the Russian economy. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 4, 82–96 (in Russian).
  • Tarahomi F., Bazzazan F. (2021). A method for preparing multi-regional input-output tables despite data limitation: FLQ-Gravity. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 42(2).
  • Tsyplakov A.A. (2022). Stationarity and growth in an agent-based economic model. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya=World of Economics and Management, 22(1), 84–102 (in Russian).
  • Wiedmann T., Suh S., Feng K. et al. (2011). Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies – the case of wind power in the UK. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(13), 5900–5907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es2007287
  • Zaitseva I. (2002). Multiregional Analysis on the base of Input-Output Table [conference presentation abstract]. 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal, Canada, 10-15th October. Available at: https://www.iioa.org/conferences/14th/papers.html
  • Zhuoying Z. (2002). The compilation of China’s interregional input-output model. Economic Systems Research, 27(2), 238–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1040740
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp